> OK, I'm in touch with the debian team, and I'll see what it takes to sneak
> buildr as part of the gentoo distribution, before I push this further.
>
> If you are involved with gentoo, I'd be happy to discuss with you on the
> best way to make buildr happen there.
No but I am.
>
> Thanks,
>
jekyll and sdoc are development dependencies to generate the website, you
won't need them.
Thanks for the offer! I'll happily work with you on this.
Thanks,
Antoine
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:19, kristian wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Antoine Toulme
> wrote:
> > OK, I'm in touch
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Antoine Toulme
wrote:
> OK, I'm in touch with the debian team, and I'll see what it takes to sneak
> buildr as part of the gentoo distribution, before I push this further.
> If you are involved with gentoo,
no
did I write ruby ebuilds for gentoo before - yes, the
OK, I'm in touch with the debian team, and I'll see what it takes to sneak
buildr as part of the gentoo distribution, before I push this further.
If you are involved with gentoo, I'd be happy to discuss with you on the
best way to make buildr happen there.
Thanks,
Antoine
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 a
as a jruby user I need better artifact as there are now.
as a jruby user I would like to install jruby from the OS and here I
see only gentoo up to date.
the moment there a gems or other application in need of jruby it must
come through the OS. putting buildr on top of jruby will just increase
th
> Hi Kristian,
>
> actually some Fedora folks contacted me and I think there is a bundle for
> Buildr now since they use it for Candlespin.
> I don't know if there is a bundle for Debian but I'd be glad to make it
> happen.
>
> Our installation instructions are probably outdated - we can work on
>
> all these linux distributions are about dependency management. and
> when building a package there needs to be all dependent "libraries"
> already available and installed. it seems rather difficult to adopt
> the ant script in a way that ant builds from the packages of the
> distribution rathe
Hi Kristian,
actually some Fedora folks contacted me and I think there is a bundle for
Buildr now since they use it for Candlespin.
I don't know if there is a bundle for Debian but I'd be glad to make it
happen.
Our installation instructions are probably outdated - we can work on that,
and having
hello,
I have a few thoughts about jruby and why is there no jruby in fedora
or outdated version in ubuntu/debian - gentoo is quite impressive (and
better then it was when I used gentoo myself).
all these linux distributions are about dependency management. and
when building a package there needs
So I pick up 3 concerns:
1. It has to do at least a better job than the previous build, and be easy
to adopt.
2. It has to build from source.
3. It depends on jruby.
1. in my opinion is a no-brainer. If there is no advantage and it's hard to
play with, why bother.
2. is tricky, because it sounds
Those are my concerns too. For those things like jffi and jruby
itself where using buildr would create a circular dependency, having
buildr as an alternative is fine, just not the main build system.
If it could exterminate the maven vermin, it would be well worth it.
On 13 August 2010 09:12, Cha
> Here's my concerns:
>
I will also throw my own concerns in here as well.
From the perspective of gentoo linux (and also basically any half decent
distro [1]), we require the ability to build jruby from source. Migrating to
Buildr could make that extremely difficult (even more so than it is
Here's my concerns:
* We've already started moving our build into Rake a bit by bit, and
the bootstrapping question becomes apparent very quickly. In other
words, we need JRuby (or Ruby) to run Buildr/Rake, but need
Buildr/Rake to build JRuby.
* Our Ant build has been a bitch to maintain, but now
Hi devs,
I would like to contribute a Buildr based build to JRuby. Buildr is a
Rake-based build system that integrates well with Maven repositories, has a
goal-based lifecycle that is very easy to extend and work with.
Buildr works on top of MRI or JRuby.
I recently contributed a build using Bui
Chris wrote:
>I know there was some activity related to allowing buildr to run on JRuby.
>Does anyone know
> what the status of that is? I may be starting a JRuby project soon and would
> love to be able to use
> buildr on it. Also, it really seems like buildr might be looking for a lot
> o
On 7/20/07, Chris Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I know there was some activity related to allowing buildr to run on
JRuby. Does anyone know what the status of that is? I may be starting a
JRuby project soon and would love to be able to use buildr on it. Also, it
really seems like buildr m
I know there was some activity related to allowing buildr to run on JRuby.
Does anyone know what the status of that is? I may be starting a JRuby
project soon and would love to be able to use buildr on it. Also, it really
seems like buildr might be looking for a lot of the stuff we do in goldspi
17 matches
Mail list logo
