I had offline discussions with Joel, Dong and Radai.
I agree that we can replace the KafkaPrincipal in Session with the
ChannelPrincipal.
KafkaPrincipal can be provided as an out of box implementation.
The only gotcha will be users will have to implement there own Authorizer,
if they decide to us
Closing the vote. KIP-115 has been accepted by:
4 binding +1s: Ismael, Jason, Joel, Ewen
6 nonbindng +1s: Dong, James, Ben, Mickael, Rajini, Colin
Thanks, everyone!
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Colin McCabe wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017, at 16:34, Onur Karaman wrote
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-4689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15844221#comment-15844221
]
Ewen Cheslack-Postava commented on KAFKA-4689:
--
Actually, the error message i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-4689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15844219#comment-15844219
]
Ewen Cheslack-Postava commented on KAFKA-4689:
--
[~hachikuji] Any further thou
Jeremy Custenborder created KAFKA-4709:
--
Summary: Error message from Struct.validate() should include the
name of the offending field.
Key: KAFKA-4709
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-4709
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-4706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15844142#comment-15844142
]
Roy Majumdar commented on KAFKA-4706:
-
Hi as a newcomer to Kafka and a beginner how sh
Retrieving the Queryable Store from the KTable is a possibility, i.e., you
could have something like:
QueryableStore store = ktable.queryableStore();
Where QueryableStore (i'm making these names up and not suggesting we use
them) is just a proxy to the underlying stores. This would be useful for
Hi Gwen, Jan,
So in addition to behaving as a hint, providing a state store name (in
materialize or overloaded) allows the user to subsequently query by using that
name. KTables have internal names, largely opaque to the users. When doing
distributed queries with IQ, a state store name is neede
Hi Jan,
I understand your concern. One implication of not passing any store name and
just getting an IQ handle is that all KTables would need to be materialised.
Currently the store name (or proposed .materialize() call) act as hints on
whether to materialise the KTable or not. Materialising ev
