[jira] [Resolved] (KAFKA-6181) Examining log messages with {{--deep-iteration}} should show superset of fields

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chia-Ping Tsai resolved KAFKA-6181. --- Fix Version/s: 2.8.0 Resolution: Fixed > Examining log messages with

Jenkins build is back to normal : Kafka » kafka-2.6-jdk8 #53

See

Build failed in Jenkins: Kafka » kafka-trunk-jdk15 #272

See Changes: [github] KAFKA-10755: Should consider commit latency when computing next commit timestamp (#9634) -- [...truncated 2.39 MB...]

Build failed in Jenkins: Kafka » kafka-trunk-jdk11 #248

See Changes: [github] KAFKA-10755: Should consider commit latency when computing next commit timestamp (#9634) -- [...truncated 2.39 MB...]

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-10757) KAFKA-10755 brings a compile error

dengziming created KAFKA-10757: -- Summary: KAFKA-10755 brings a compile error Key: KAFKA-10757 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10757 Project: Kafka Issue Type: Bug

Re: [VOTE] KIP-680: TopologyTestDriver should not require a Properties argument

Thanks again for the KIP, Rohit. I’m +1 (binding) Sorry, I missed your vote thread. -John On Fri, Nov 20, 2020, at 21:35, Rohit Deshpande wrote: > Thanks Guozhang. > Waiting for binding votes. > Thanks, > Rohit > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 10:13 AM Guozhang Wang wrote: > > > +1, thanks

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-10756) Add missing unit test for `UnattachedState`

dengziming created KAFKA-10756: -- Summary: Add missing unit test for `UnattachedState` Key: KAFKA-10756 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10756 Project: Kafka Issue Type: Sub-task

Re: [VOTE] KIP-680: TopologyTestDriver should not require a Properties argument

Thanks Guozhang. Waiting for binding votes. Thanks, Rohit On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 10:13 AM Guozhang Wang wrote: > +1, thanks Rohit. > > > Guozhang > > On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 11:53 AM Rohit Deshpande > wrote: > > > Hello all, > > I would like to start voting on KIP-680: TopologyTestDriver

Re: [VOTE] 2.6.1 RC0

Mickael, we discovered a regression bug in Kafka Streams today that was introduced in the 2.6.0 release. It affects EOS users, what is a growing percentage of Kafka Streams users. I marked it as critical for now, but would propose it as a blocker for 2.6.1. What do you think? Can we roll a new

[jira] [Resolved] (KAFKA-10752) One topic partition multiple consumer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10752?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matthias J. Sax resolved KAFKA-10752. - Resolution: Invalid [~dnamicro] – we use the Jira board for bug reports, not to answer

[jira] [Resolved] (KAFKA-10745) Please let me know how I check the time which Source connector receive the data from source table.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10745?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matthias J. Sax resolved KAFKA-10745. - Resolution: Invalid [~nayusik] – we use the Jira board for bug reports, not to answer

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-10755) Should consider commit latency when computing next commit timestamp

Matthias J. Sax created KAFKA-10755: --- Summary: Should consider commit latency when computing next commit timestamp Key: KAFKA-10755 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10755 Project:

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-405: Kafka Tiered Storage

Hi Harsha/Satish, Hope you are doing well. Would you be able to please update the meeting notes section for the most recent 2 meetings (from 10/13 and 11/10)? It will be useful to share the context with the community.

Re: Identifying JIRA's for contribution

Thanks John. This helps. Will redirect my team towards the list. On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 8:03 PM John Roesler wrote: > Hi Loknath, > > A couple of people replied to you already. Here’s the thread: >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-684 - Support mutual TLS authentication on SASL_SSL listeners

The vote has passed with 4 binding votes (David, Ismael, Manikumar, me) and one non-binding vote (Ron). Many thanks to everyone who reviewed and voted. I will update the KIP page and submit a PR. Thank you, Rajini On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 9:41 AM Manikumar wrote: > +1 (binding), Thanks for

Re: Identifying JIRA's for contribution

Hi Loknath, A couple of people replied to you already. Here’s the thread: https://lists.apache.org/x/thread.html/rb93185752163fa71acfce5d11820a48f6c4551863aa3d1d98b21c0ea@%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E I’m not sure what might have been wrong. Did you subscribe by following the instructions at

Jenkins build is back to normal : Kafka » kafka-trunk-jdk11 #247

See

Build failed in Jenkins: Kafka » kafka-trunk-jdk15 #271

See Changes: [github] KAFKA-10607: Consistent behaviour for response errorCounts() (#9433) [github] MINOR: remove unnecessary semicolon from Agent.java and AgentClient.java (#9625)

Re: Identifying JIRA's for contribution

Quick follow up. Are there any outstanding works which require contributions ? On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 4:21 PM Loknath Priyatham Teja Singamsetty < lsingamse...@salesforce.com> wrote: > Hi Kafka Team, > > We are a team of interested people from the Salesforce company and want to > contribute to

Build failed in Jenkins: Kafka » kafka-trunk-jdk11 #246

See Changes: [github] MINOR: Factor out common response parsing logic (#9617) -- [...truncated 6.95 MB...]