Re: [VOTE] KIP-927: Improve the kafka-metadata-quorum output

2023-05-20 Thread John Roesler
I’m +1 (binding) Thanks, Federico! It looks like a nice improvement to me. -John On Sat, May 20, 2023, at 09:16, Kamal Chandraprakash wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 3:22 AM Divij Vaidya > wrote: > >> +1 (non binding) >> >> Divij Vaidya >> >> >> >> On Tue, May 16, 2023

Build failed in Jenkins: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » trunk #1856

2023-05-20 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See Changes: -- [...truncated 569407 lines...] [2023-05-20T19:36:10.576Z] Gradle Test Run :streams:integrationTest > Gradle Test Executor 182 > RestoreIntegrationTest >

Jenkins build is still unstable: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » 3.4 #134

2023-05-20 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 3.5.0 release

2023-05-20 Thread Ismael Juma
Hi Mickael, What's the plan for the first RC? In my opinion, we should really tighten the criteria for what's considered a blocker and release RC0 soon (given where we are timeline wise). Ismael On Sat, May 20, 2023, 8:15 AM Mickael Maison wrote: > Hi Matthias, > > Yes feel free to backport

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 3.5.0 release

2023-05-20 Thread Mickael Maison
Hi Matthias, Yes feel free to backport to 3.5. Thanks, Mickael On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 12:53 AM Akhilesh Chaganti wrote: > > Hi Mickael, > > I raised the blockers for AK 3.5 and raised PRs for them. All of them are > in the Zk -> KRaft migration path and critical for the Zk -> KRaft >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-927: Improve the kafka-metadata-quorum output

2023-05-20 Thread Kamal Chandraprakash
+1 (non binding) On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 3:22 AM Divij Vaidya wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > Divij Vaidya > > > > On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 4:35 AM ziming deng > wrote: > > > Thanks for this improvement, +1 from me(binging) > > > > — > > Best, > > Ziming > > > > > On May 16, 2023, at 00:43,

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Cluster Linking / Cross-Cluster Replication - Call for Interest & Co-Authors

2023-05-20 Thread hudeqi
Hi, I am also very excited to see this discussion, because I also implemented the "federation model" based on the kafka-0.10.2.1 version before in company and got benefits from going online. It solves the problem of seamlessly migrating the bytesIn/bytesOut of a topic to another kafka cluster

Re: [DISCUSS] Cluster Linking / Cross-Cluster Replication - Call for Interest & Co-Authors

2023-05-20 Thread Chia-Ping Tsai
Hi Greg I do love this feature/discussion :) I’d like to not only be a co-author/reviewer but also sponsor this feature by requesting our employees to be the contributors. Thanks! Chia-Ping > Luke Chen 於 2023年5月20日 下午6:47 寫道: > > Hi Greg, > > Thanks for starting this discussion. Yes, this

Re: [DISCUSS] Cluster Linking / Cross-Cluster Replication - Call for Interest & Co-Authors

2023-05-20 Thread Luke Chen
Hi Greg, Thanks for starting this discussion. Yes, this is definitely a valuable feature. I'd be willing to volunteer for co-author and reviewer or anything else I can help. Hope we can make it happen! Thank you! Luke Thomas Scott 於 2023年5月20日 週六 上午6:34 寫道: > Hi Greg, > > This sounds very

[GitHub] [kafka-site] omkreddy merged pull request #512: MINOR: Add System Properties to config documentation section

2023-05-20 Thread via GitHub
omkreddy merged PR #512: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/512 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: