Re: [VOTE] Add TaskId field to StreamsException

Thanks all for voting! This KIP passes with five +1 (binding) votes from John, Bill, Guozhang, Matthias, and myself, and three +1 (non-binding) votes from Luke, Walker, and Israel. Best, Sophie On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 11:58 AM Matthias J. Sax wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On 10/19/21 10:37 AM,

Re: [VOTE] Add TaskId field to StreamsException

+1 (binding) On 10/19/21 10:37 AM, Israel Ekpo wrote: Thanks for the KIP +1 from me (non binding) On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 12:39 PM Guozhang Wang wrote: Thanks for the KIP Sophie, I'm big +1 on this idea :) On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 6:48 AM Bill Bejeck wrote: Thanks for the KIP Sophie, I

Re: [VOTE] Add TaskId field to StreamsException

Thanks for the KIP +1 from me (non binding) On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 12:39 PM Guozhang Wang wrote: > Thanks for the KIP Sophie, I'm big +1 on this idea :) > > On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 6:48 AM Bill Bejeck wrote: > > > Thanks for the KIP Sophie, I think this will be helpful. > > > > +1(binding) >

Re: [VOTE] Add TaskId field to StreamsException

Thanks for the KIP Sophie, I'm big +1 on this idea :) On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 6:48 AM Bill Bejeck wrote: > Thanks for the KIP Sophie, I think this will be helpful. > > +1(binding) > > -Bill > > On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 5:04 PM John Roesler wrote: > > > Thanks, Sophie, > > > > +1 from me. > > >

Re: [VOTE] Add TaskId field to StreamsException

Thanks for the KIP Sophie, I think this will be helpful. +1(binding) -Bill On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 5:04 PM John Roesler wrote: > Thanks, Sophie, > > +1 from me. > > I was a little apprehensive about the potential to break > exception handler logic, but I agree with your comment in > the

Re: [VOTE] Add TaskId field to StreamsException

Thanks, Sophie, +1 from me. I was a little apprehensive about the potential to break exception handler logic, but I agree with your comment in the "compatibility" section: Identifying the causes of exceptions is always kind of chaotic and this seems like more of an improvement than anything.

Re: [VOTE] Add TaskId field to StreamsException

Hey Sophie, +1 for me, I think that is would only help. Walker On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 1:45 AM Luke Chen wrote: > Hi Sophie, > Add taskId to make the exception much clear is a good improvement. > + 1 (non-binding) > > Thank you. > Luke > > On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 12:10 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman

Re: [VOTE] Add TaskId field to StreamsException

Hi Sophie, Add taskId to make the exception much clear is a good improvement. + 1 (non-binding) Thank you. Luke On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 12:10 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman wrote: > Hey all, > > I'd like to kick off the vote on this small KIP which adds a TaskId field > to the StreamsException class.

[VOTE] Add TaskId field to StreamsException

Hey all, I'd like to kick off the vote on this small KIP which adds a TaskId field to the StreamsException class. Please take a look and cast your vote when you have a chance. Links: - KIP-783: Add TaskId field to StreamsException - PR