Hi,
I'm sure that pax-exam is one of the better approaches.
Did you consider doing this at the OPS4J project?
I opened a issue http://issues.ops4j.org/browse/PAXWEB-242
for Integration tests, Ideas are welcome as are contributions :)
Regards, Achim
Hi,
I plan to create a test case to check je
-1; for embedding this external feature into karaf
+1 on the central "knowledge" base about external features available :)
One side node, OpenEJB with Karaf, Interesting something I always wanted
to try :)
Also -1; I'm also for the repository approach! (I've also added something like
this al
I've added the 2.1.5 to versions to JIRA, and bumped this issue's fix
version out to 2.1.5 :)
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Agreed. Though that version does not exists yet.
>
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 23:07, Jamie G. wrote:
>> Karaf-458 was added to the 2.1.4 'to fi
Agreed. Though that version does not exists yet.
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 23:07, Jamie G. wrote:
> Karaf-458 was added to the 2.1.4 'to fix' list, perhaps we can move
> this along to 2.1.5?
>
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Jamie G. wrote:
>> Sounds like we have some consensus to start the p
Karaf-458 was added to the 2.1.4 'to fix' list, perhaps we can move
this along to 2.1.5?
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Jamie G. wrote:
> Sounds like we have some consensus to start the process soon... we've
> just updated the web site infrastructure to Scalate, so I'd like to
> give some time
Sounds like we have some consensus to start the process soon... we've
just updated the web site infrastructure to Scalate, so I'd like to
give some time to validate that all is in order before kicking off a
release candidate build.
In the mean time I'll start in on updating the readme, etc.
J
On
Also -1; I'm also for the repository approach! (I've also added something like
this already to the roadmap page)
kind regards,
andreas
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 07:37:52PM +0100, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> -1 If they have it, why would we copy it and have to maintain it. We
> can simply point users
-1 If they have it, why would we copy it and have to maintain it. We
can simply point users to it, can't we ?
I don't really want to maintain a feature file for all projects people
could be interested in, that doesn't scale and will only add more
dependencies and problems to our builds. I'd like
I've pushed the instructions so they should be live in one / two hours.
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 17:13, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> The new web site is live now.
> I will update the following page for more instructions on how to edit
> / publish the site:
> http://karaf.apache.org/index/community/f
Hi,
I plan to create a test case to check jetty.xml with karaf. Is
pax-exam test approach the best way to do that or can we test that
differently ?
Regards,
Charles Moulliard
Sr. Principal Solution Architect - FuseSource
Apache Committer
Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
Twitter : http://t
Hi,
OpenEJB project has created a feature file to deploy their bundles.
This should be an excellent candidate for our Enterprise Features file
and a compagnion for Aries. Is it better to copy / paste their
features in our file or to point to their feature file in
org.apache.karaf.features.cfg ?
+
Awesome. I think it we at least at those informations each time we
add / modify a command, we'll soon have an awesome help system ! :-)
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 17:30, wrote:
> Author: iocanel
> Date: Fri Feb 11 16:30:53 2011
> New Revision: 1069862
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1069
The new web site is live now.
I will update the following page for more instructions on how to edit
/ publish the site:
http://karaf.apache.org/index/community/faq/how-do-i-edit-the-website.html
Please report any issue you see asap.
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 13:45, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I'll
I guess that you are referring to the -b option. But no it doesn't solve the
problem.
With or without the use of the -b option the file will be created under etc.
For example my.config-instance1.
The problem is that the pid that will be generated for it will be unknown to
me. So I need a way to e
Forget that, I misunderstood the patch.
Could you please fix the description on the @Option annotation for the
useFile field ...
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 16:46, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Isnt' that already done by the config:update command which actually
> save to the disk and overwrite the propert
Isnt' that already done by the config:update command which actually
save to the disk and overwrite the properties file ?
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 16:36, wrote:
> Author: iocanel
> Date: Fri Feb 11 15:36:18 2011
> New Revision: 1069840
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1069840&view=rev
> L
Sounds good - please include instructions for how to update the new
site for those of us not familiar with Scalate.
J
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I'll migrate the web site over to the scalate generated one this afternoon.
> Once done and working, I'll write some doc
I'll migrate the web site over to the scalate generated one this afternoon.
Once done and working, I'll write some doc about how it's done.
If everything's ok, the confluence space should be kept as a wiki and
for the 2.1.x manual.
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http://
My +1 for the 2.1.4
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Achim Nierbeck wrote:
> +1 for a 2.1.4 release
>
> 2011/2/11 :
> > I would like to work on documentation this afternoon, before the release.
> >
> > I do my best to do it shortly.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Regards
> > JB
> > -Original Message
+1 for a 2.1.4 release
2011/2/11 :
> I would like to work on documentation this afternoon, before the release.
>
> I do my best to do it shortly.
>
> Thanks
> Regards
> JB
> -Original Message-
> From: "Jamie G."
> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 08:24:26
> To:
> Reply-To: dev@karaf.apache.org
>
I would like to work on documentation this afternoon, before the release.
I do my best to do it shortly.
Thanks
Regards
JB
-Original Message-
From: "Jamie G."
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 08:24:26
To:
Reply-To: dev@karaf.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Karaf 2.1.4 status
I'd like to hear
I'd like to hear back from JB on his manual updates, I could wait on
starting the release candidate process if he has a bunch of updates it
could pick up. Otherwise I'm good to start things rolling :)
J
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 4:08 AM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
> mhm, from my point of view we can go
22 matches
Mail list logo
