Exactly this approval process is what I wanted to support with my
proposal. You create your own distro in an easy way and have exactly
what you need. This will make approval easier.
We could of course also create a max assembly and combine it with a
custom distro functionality. So people could
Hi Mike,
It could be interested. AFAIR, David worked on the new MOJO and the full
distribution provide quite the same thing.
We can guarantee a "standard" Karaf full distribution but not a custom
Karaf distribution.
Anyway, as I said in previous threads, as soon as Karaf 2.2.1 is out, we
w
I understand that. What I meant is that you setup your distro in a place
with internet connection and then bring the distribution zip into the
closed environment.
Christian
Am 03.05.2011 22:56, schrieb Achim Nierbeck:
Hi Christian,
well the scenario Mike is talking of you are not able to do
Hi Christian,
You can do this right now in trunk with a karaf-assembly project.
I don't see how it really helps in a closed environment, nor do I understand
how the proposed karaf-max will help. In my experience when you have a closed
environment there's an approval process to get stuff into i
Hi Christian,
well the scenario Mike is talking of you are not able to download your
dependencies at all.
There are certain environments where you merely don't get the desired
downloads,
especially with maven.
so yes I can understand and support the idea of building an additional
distro including
+1 (non binding)
btw. I really like the recent enhancements. Great work Ioannis and
Jean-Baptiste.
Christian
Am 03.05.2011 19:41, schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré:
Hi all,
following our discussion about Karaf clustering and Cellar, I would
like to launch a vote to add Cellar into Karaf trunk
Hi Mike,
while this is sure possible it would be quite big. Especially if you
also would include other projects like camel or activemq.
Instead I propose to add some commands to karaf to download dependencies
to the sytem dir. So the user could load karaf. Add the feature url he
needs and wi
David Jencks wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> karaf-full is supposed to be identical to the non-minimal karaf assembly
> from the old style assembly.
>
> I have no objection to your proposal and I think it would be pretty
> trivial to make such an assembly using the karaf-assembly packaging.
>
> I'm cu
Hi Mike,
karaf-full is supposed to be identical to the non-minimal karaf assembly from
the old style assembly.
I have no objection to your proposal and I think it would be pretty trivial to
make such an assembly using the karaf-assembly packaging.
I'm curious about the environment you are in t
mikevan wrote:
>
> For folks developing applications to deploy into Karaf on closed networks,
> it is not always feasable to be able to download all the optional packages
> for which we have optional console commands. I'm thinking web:, http:,
> obr:, and the like.
>
> I propse we create a new
For folks developing applications to deploy into Karaf on closed networks, it
is not always feasable to be able to download all the optional packages for
which we have optional console commands. I'm thinking web:, http:, obr:,
and the like.
I propse we create a new assembly for karaf that will in
+1 - Non binding.
On May 3, 2011, at 12:43 PM, mikevan wrote:
>
> Andreas Pieber wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Achim Nierbeck
>> wrote:
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Am 03.05.2011 19:47, schrieb Ioannis Canellos:
+1
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 8:4
Andreas Pieber wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Achim Nierbeck
> wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> Am 03.05.2011 19:47, schrieb Ioannis Canellos:
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 8:41 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> wrote:
>>>
Hi all,
>>
+1
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Achim Nierbeck wrote:
> +1
>
> Am 03.05.2011 19:47, schrieb Ioannis Canellos:
>> +1
>>
>> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 8:41 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> following our discussion about Karaf clustering and Cellar, I would like to
>>> launc
+1
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Achim Nierbeck wrote:
> +1
>
> Am 03.05.2011 19:47, schrieb Ioannis Canellos:
>> +1
>>
>> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 8:41 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> following our discussion about Karaf clustering and Cellar, I would like to
>>> launc
+1
Am 03.05.2011 19:47, schrieb Ioannis Canellos:
> +1
>
> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 8:41 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> following our discussion about Karaf clustering and Cellar, I would like to
>> launch a vote to add Cellar into Karaf trunk.
>>
>> This addition covers the foll
+1
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 8:41 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> following our discussion about Karaf clustering and Cellar, I would like to
> launch a vote to add Cellar into Karaf trunk.
>
> This addition covers the following topics:
>
> 1/ Source code
> Currently, Cellar source cod
Hi all,
following our discussion about Karaf clustering and Cellar, I would like
to launch a vote to add Cellar into Karaf trunk.
This addition covers the following topics:
1/ Source code
Currently, Cellar source code is on github. It will be added into Karaf
trunk, on a cellar maven module.
+1 to start the vote
Kind regards,
Andreas
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Jamie G. wrote:
> +1 for the vote
>
> J
>
> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 4:21 AM, Achim Nierbeck
> wrote:
>> Hi JB,
>>
>> +1 for the vote
>>
>> 2011/5/3 Jean-Baptiste Onofré :
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I've deeper tested Cellar ton
+1 for the vote
J
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 4:21 AM, Achim Nierbeck wrote:
> Hi JB,
>
> +1 for the vote
>
> 2011/5/3 Jean-Baptiste Onofré :
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've deeper tested Cellar tonight, especially the group usage and it works
>> like a charm. I began to make some enhancements (commands output
20 matches
Mail list logo