Hi,
I thing there is a difference in the OSGi specs about importing java.* packages.
The OSGI core spec 6.0 says in section 3.4:
Bundles do not import the java.* packages and can therefore not specify their
dependencies on
these variations in the environment using the Import-Package header. The O
eedback about how easy/hard it is to run the tests
:).
I plan to release 8.0.5 to be included in Karaf 4.4.1 and we should be ready
this week (with Pax Web 8.0.5).
thanks for the issue+PR!
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
wt., 28 cze 2022 o 14:04 Siano, Stephan
napisał(a):
> Hi,
>
> I have a
Hi,
I have a meta-question concerning extensions in pax-web.
With pax-web 8.0.4 (which is the latest version of the pax-web in the karaf 4.4
release) thanks to Grzegorz parsing of global and war specific context.xml
files works in pax-web-tomcat.
However there is still one limitation: If the c
handling
Hello
wt., 24 maj 2022 o 15:28 Siano, Stephan
napisał(a):
> Hi Grzegorz,
>
> > These are kind of inline dev notes. I can imagine that they may blur
> > the
> code, but I really tried to ensure that everything is consistent, so I
> spent a lot of time reading the
&
osgi container may
help.
Best regards
Stephan
-Original Message-
From: Steven Huypens
Sent: Tuesday, 24 May 2022 15:29
To: dev@karaf.apache.org
Subject: Re: SSH warnings seen in Pax Exam test log after upgrade to 4.3.7
Hi Stephan,
That is JDK 8
Steven
On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 3:22 PM
From: Grzegorz Grzybek
Sent: Tuesday, 24 May 2022 11:44
To: dev@karaf.apache.org
Subject: Re: Karaf 4.4.0/Pax-Web 8.0.2 Tomcat context handling
Hello
wt., 24 maj 2022 o 09:59 Siano, Stephan
napisał(a):
> Hi,
>
> I have been trying around with Karaf 4.4.0 with the pax-web-tomcat
>
Hi,
Which JDK are you using for your pax-exam-tests? As far as I remember ed25519
is only available in JDK 15 and later.
Best regards
Stephan
-Original Message-
From: Steven Huypens
Sent: Tuesday, 24 May 2022 14:51
To: dev@karaf.apache.org
Subject: Re: SSH warnings seen in Pax Exam te
Hi,
I have been trying around with Karaf 4.4.0 with the pax-web-tomcat webcontainer
in the last days. First of all I want to state that Grzegorz did a fantastic
job with the Pax-Web refactoring!
Nevertheless, I encountered a few issues with tomcat context.xml handling.
First of all prior versi
Hi Jean-Baptiste,
What Grzegorz is proposing looks to me like some magic behind-the-scenes
automatic wrap for all kind of installed bundles.
I am not sure if this is really such a good idea. If it works, it can make
things work that do not work without some significant effort like manually
wra
think 3 (with a handler) is more robust long term. WDYT ?
Regards
JB
On 11/02/2019 12:35, Siano, Stephan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A little more than a week ago I wrote about an issue about an interference
> between the way javax.activation is installed on Karaf 4.2.3 for Java 8, and
> the J
Hi,
A little more than a week ago I wrote about an issue about an interference
between the way javax.activation is installed on Karaf 4.2.3 for Java 8, and
the Javamail and the saaj-impl 1.3.1 bundles and the way they expose MIME
handlers, which resulted in a ClassCastException. In the meantime
stripped from that. Kind of wonder if the
shade plugin can be used to fix that or not. Hmm….
Dan
> On Jan 31, 2019, at 7:30 AM, Siano, Stephan wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We are building a custom distribution currently based on Karaf 4.2.2 (but
> including some changes from
B
On 31/01/2019 13:30, Siano, Stephan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are building a custom distribution currently based on Karaf 4.2.2 (but
> including some changes from Karaf 4.2.3) which is running on Java 8. We have
> observed that once we are sending a SOAP message with attachments via C
Hi,
We are building a custom distribution currently based on Karaf 4.2.2 (but
including some changes from Karaf 4.2.3) which is running on Java 8. We have
observed that once we are sending a SOAP message with attachments via CXF,
javamail will stop working.
The root cause for this was the foll
Hi Grzegorz,
When you are about to align dependency versions between pax-web and karaf, is
it also possible to have a common xbean-version? Karaf references 4.12, whereas
pax-web references 4.6, which results in a rather weird mix between these two
versions in the resulting karaf container (I c
－
Freeman(Yue) Fang
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
> On Sep 6, 2018, at 10:05 PM, Siano, Stephan wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am using JDK 8 (and a custom karaf distribution). However it should not be
> so difficult to reproduce:
> 1. Install Woodst
d you please tell me the steps to reproduce this error?
I want to reproduce it and take a close look.
Thanks!
－
Freeman(Yue) Fang
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
> On Sep 6, 2018, at 8:14 PM, Siano, Stephan wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> with Karaf 4.2.0 Guilla
Hi,
with Karaf 4.2.0 Guillaume Nodet introduced some mechanism around the
org.apache.karaf.specs.activator bundle that allowed the lookup of registered
service implementations (like woodstox for the Stax-API) in Karaf 4.2.0.
With 4.2.1 the jar is gone from the boot classpath (with two commits w
Hi,
I just wanted to try out the current 4.2.1-SNAPSHOT version of Karaf (as it is
supposed to be released soon). Therefore I built the master branch locally and
tried to start karaf with it (Windows 10, Sun JDK 8).
When I do a "su" on the console and then try to issue a command, I get a
Stack
going to investigate, but the easier might be to use spi-fly. It
>>> would require 2 fragments (or modifications), but this is not a generic
>>> solution: each provider / consumer has to be extended in some way to opt-in.
>>>
>>> Also, things like javamail might get a
Hi,
Till Karaf 4.1.x the endorsed libs delivered with karaf contain some servicemix
wrapped bundles for standard javax APIs. An example for this is the Stax API
(javax.xml.stream). These wrapped API bundles replace the implementation lookup
mechanism provided by the JDK with one also working in
the following to the
etc/shell.init.script
setopt disable-highlighter
Cheers,
Guillaume
2017-03-29 7:51 GMT+02:00 Siano, Stephan :
> Hi,
>
> I don't think that this is a showstopper, but the release has still very
> strange console color effects on windows:
>
> How to rep
Hi,
I don't think that this is a showstopper, but the release has still very
strange console color effects on windows:
How to reproduce:
1. download the zip file from
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachekaraf-1090/org/apache/karaf/apache-karaf/4.1.1/
and unzip it somew
23 matches
Mail list logo
