On 09/18/2018 05:52 PM, Robert Munteanu wrote:
One things which threw me off a bit is that even existing repositories
now have a status of "Source hasn't been processed yet..." . That looks
mostly cosmetic though since the old data is still there.
Aaah, yeah, I think the logic here is "this
On 09/18/2018 05:58 PM, Robert Munteanu wrote:
On Tue, 2018-09-18 at 17:55 +0200, Daniel Gruno wrote:
One thing to note; For GitHub repos, you will need to specify a
user/pass if you want github issues/PRs to be looked at - this can be
an
anonymous account if you like. I'll see if I can't work
On Tue, 2018-09-18 at 17:55 +0200, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> One thing to note; For GitHub repos, you will need to specify a
> user/pass if you want github issues/PRs to be looked at - this can be
> an
> anonymous account if you like. I'll see if I can't work our regular
> kibble user into the
On 09/18/2018 05:52 PM, Robert Munteanu wrote:
On Thu, 2018-09-13 at 16:45 +0200, Daniel Gruno wrote:
On 09/13/2018 04:42 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
On 09/13/2018 04:38 PM, Robert Munteanu wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to simplify my job of keeping the list of sources up-
to-
date for the Kibble demo
On Thu, 2018-09-13 at 16:45 +0200, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> On 09/13/2018 04:42 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> > On 09/13/2018 04:38 PM, Robert Munteanu wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am trying to simplify my job of keeping the list of sources up-
> > > to-
> > > date for the Kibble demo instance.
