Great - please consider going through the JIRAs marked for 0.15.0 and set
the fix version to 1.0.0 with some commentary as to why it should be
included and preferably with some assessment of perceived risk to
destabilizing what is essentially the 0.14.0 release.
We can then circle back on those an
+1.
Colm.
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Philip Zampino wrote:
> Sounds good. I've already implemented a few patches I would like to see in
> 1.0.0, and I agree that we should go through the others +1
>
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 9:12 AM, larry mccay wrote:
>
> > All -
> >
> > As we discussed
Sounds good. I've already implemented a few patches I would like to see in
1.0.0, and I agree that we should go through the others +1
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 9:12 AM, larry mccay wrote:
> All -
>
> As we discussed back in November [1], we should follow up the recent 0.14.0
> release with a 1.0.0
All -
As we discussed back in November [1], we should follow up the recent 0.14.0
release with a 1.0.0 with the renaming of the class packages.
In addition to the package renames, we could also accommodate any fixes or
upgrades that would be work well toward the backward compatibility
commitments
