Unfortunately, I forgot to list the [1] thread that is in the JIRA for
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-641.
This is where it was proposed that we defer the pac4j work to 0.8.0.
Sorry for any confusion.
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 3:13 PM, larry mccay wrote:
> All -
>
> I would like to bot
Larry, thanks for volunteering to manage the next release. The feature set
and release date both sound terrific to me. I think the community will
greatly benefit from quick releases that have meaty features.
+1
Sumit.
On 1/5/16, 3:13 PM, "larry mccay" wrote:
>All -
>
>I would like to both vol
All -
I would like to both volunteer as release manager and start identifying the
target features for an 0.8.0 release.
As has been discussed on the [1] thread, the driving feature should be the
inclusion of the incoming pac4j federation provider and some key
authentication mechanisms:
* CAS
* O
