Re: [l10n-dev] Collection user additons to spell check dictionary

2006-11-01 Thread Laurent Godard
Hi dan We must find people, who will review all words and approve/reject them - this is the biggest issue we have now. this was my only remark when Robert presented its interresting project Yes, we need the validators and the programers to implement backend and improve the macro. Generally

Re: [l10n-dev] Collection user additons to spell check dictionary

2006-11-01 Thread Alex Thurgood
Robert Ludvik a écrit : Hi Robert, From my point of view it is terrific idea. I know doctors and lawyers who are creating their own small dictionaries and would really like to contribute words into the official spellcheck dictionary. Many small dictionaries means one big dictionary ;-) Exa

Re: [l10n-dev] Collection user additons to spell check dictionary

2006-11-01 Thread Robert Ludvik
Alex Thurgood pravi: We must find people, who will review all words and approve/reject them - this is the biggest issue we have now. Well, you can count me in. Alex If you speak Slovenian, I'd be honoured ;-) Robert Ludvik ---

Re: [l10n-dev] Collection user additons to spell check dictionary

2006-11-01 Thread Alex Thurgood
Robert Ludvik a écrit : If you speak Slovenian, I'd be honoured ;-) Haven't quite mastered that one yet, and to be frank, it's not high up on my hit list of languages to learn next ;-) Alex - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: [l10n-dev] Collection user additons to spell check dictionary

2006-11-01 Thread Dan Ohnesorg
Dne Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 08:27:07PM +0100, Simon Brouwer napsal: > I have some thoughts on the technology preview. First, I'm not sure if > anonymous contributions should be allowed. Without a real name and > contact information it may be too difficult to establish if the > information is prope

Re: [l10n-dev] Collection user additons to spell check dictionary

2006-11-01 Thread Dan Ohnesorg
Dne Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 10:07:13AM +0100, Alex Thurgood napsal: > Robert Ludvik a écrit : > > Hi Robert, > > > From my point of view it is terrific idea. I know doctors and lawyers > >who are creating their own small dictionaries and would really like to > >contribute words into the official s

Re: [l10n-dev] Collection user additons to spell check dictionary

2006-11-01 Thread Robert Ludvik
Dan Ohnesorg pravi: We can also ask for the language upon submitting the entry. But if people should use it, the submission should be easy and fast. By default the OOo language should be checked, but if user wants to, he/she can change the language of submission. What about macros/whatever f

[l10n-dev] Fine initiative. Some architectural questions.

2006-11-01 Thread r.j.baars
As a member of the Dutch Open Language Initiative 'OpenTaal' (www.opentaal.org), linked to the dutch ooo localisation group, I was directed to this new initiative. And a nice one it is. It would contribute a lot in harvesting words. Which is my contribution to the Dutch Open language Initiativ

[l10n-dev] OOo 2.1 l10n builds available from cws localisation17

2006-11-01 Thread Ivo Hinkelmann
Hi l10n teams, the localisations for the OOo 2.1 release have been merged into the cws localisation17: http://eis.services.openoffice.org/EIS2/servlet/cws.ShowCWS?Id=4511&Path=SRC680%2Flocalisation17 I have created builds from the cws: Solaris Sparc , Solaris Intel , Linux language packs for