[l10n-dev] Default date formats - enhancement needed?

2006-12-05 Thread Marcin Miłkowski
Hi *, I've got a question regarding the general date format localization settings. In locale data, we've got regional settings files (like de_DE.xml or pl_PL.xml), and they allow for localizing various formats. Now, I think there is a serious limitation, at least for Polish. The problem is t

Re: [l10n-dev] Default date formats - enhancement needed?

2006-12-05 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Marcin, On Tuesday, 2006-12-05 12:26:25 +0100, Marcin Mi�?kowski wrote: > [... genitive date forms (posessive context) ...] See http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62460 > And there could be > a setting in the XML processing that when there is no long inflected > name specified

Re: [l10n-dev] Default date formats - enhancement needed?

2006-12-07 Thread Clytie Siddall
On 06/12/2006, at 1:56 AM, Eike Rathke wrote: On Tuesday, 2006-12-05 12:26:25 +0100, Marcin Mi�?kowski wrote: [... genitive date forms (posessive context) ...] See http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62460 And there could be a setting in the XML processing that when there is n

Re: [l10n-dev] Default date formats - enhancement needed?

2006-12-07 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Clytie, On Thursday, 2006-12-07 23:17:10 +1030, Clytie Siddall wrote: > >>[... genitive date forms (posessive context) ...] > Does strftime handle this issue? AFAIK no implementation of strftime() does. > if not, it would be worth-while > passing the information on to that project as well,

Re: [l10n-dev] Default date formats - enhancement needed?

2006-12-09 Thread Clytie Siddall
Thanks for your reply, Eike. :) On 08/12/2006, at 2:52 AM, Eike Rathke wrote: [... genitive date forms (posessive context) ...] Does strftime handle this issue? AFAIK no implementation of strftime() does. if not, it would be worth-while passing the information on to that project as well,