Hi all,
I'm opening a new thread, but this is a follow up of the discussion
between Oliver, Eike and Andre.
I've met several issues during the localization process of 3.0 and would
like to discuss them, may be we (I, at least :) can have a better
understanding on the whole process after.
- their
Hi Sophie,
first of all, really thank you for providing feedback. it is so
important to share such issues.
Let me try to answer your questions:
On 09/22/08 13:47, sophie wrote:
Hi all,
I'm opening a new thread, but this is a follow up of the discussion
between Oliver, Eike and Andre.
I've
Hi Sophie,
I can give my feedback only on 2 of your questions, see details inline.
sophie wrote:
Hi all,
I'm opening a new thread, but this is a follow up of the discussion
between Oliver, Eike and Andre.
I've met several issues during the localization process of 3.0 and would
like to discuss
Hi Sophie,
sophie schrieb:
- about the integration process, several UI issues that have been
corrected in m28 are not integrated in m5, how can we make the process
of integration more reliable, shall we provide .sdf files systematically
on the issue, shall we open a new issue (assigned to whom?
Hi Rafaella, all,
Rafaella Braconi wrote:
> Hi Sophie,
>
> first of all, really thank you for providing feedback. it is so
> important to share such issues.
Thanks, I hope others will jump in with their own issues and that we
will end with a smooth and easy process :-)
>
> Let me try to answer y
Hi Thorsten,
Thorsten Ziehm wrote:
> Hi Sophie,
>
> I can give my feedback only on 2 of your questions, see details inline.
Thank you for this.
>
> sophie wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm opening a new thread, but this is a follow up of the discussion
>> between Oliver, Eike and Andre.
>>
>> I've met
Hi Ivo,
Ivo Hinkelmann - Sun Germany - wrote:
> Hi Sophie,
>
> sophie schrieb:
>> - about the integration process, several UI issues that have been
>> corrected in m28 are not integrated in m5, how can we make the process
>> of integration more reliable, shall we provide .sdf files systematically
Hi Sophie,
sophie schrieb:
- would it be possible that we test the cws localisationXX before it is
integrated in master. I'm aware of the very short time but may be it
will save some time later in the process if we can check for issues before?
It is possible and it is recommended. For most, if
Hi Jörg,
Jörg Jahnke wrote:
> Hi Sophie,
>
> sophie schrieb:
>> - would it be possible that we test the cws localisationXX before it is
>> integrated in master. I'm aware of the very short time but may be it
>> will save some time later in the process if we can check for issues
>> before?
>
> It
Hi Sophie,
sophie schrieb:
We do that testing using the TCM, but as far as I know, the cws is
integrated before the end of the tests.
That can be the case, depending on the extent of the tests. We usually
only have a week of time for testing of an l10n CWS, and close to an RC
this time mig
Hi Jörg,
Jörg Jahnke wrote:
> Hi Sophie,
>
> sophie schrieb:
>>
>> We do that testing using the TCM, but as far as I know, the cws is
>> integrated before the end of the tests.
>>
>
> That can be the case, depending on the extent of the tests. We usually
> only have a week of time for testing of
11 matches
Mail list logo
