On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 5:58 AM, Ivo Hinkelmann ivo.hinkelm...@sun.com wrote:
Hi,
there is an ga also in Pootle. Did you requested the migration to Pootle? We
can only use one file, either by Pootle or by this URL list. So in case you
don't use pootle we have to remove it there.
Cheers,
Dňa Po 13. December 2010 Ivo Hinkelmann napísal (On Po 13. December
2010 Ivo Hinkelmann wrote):
all I can do is to either remove sk from this list or from pootle.
Sadly I don't have a better mechanism to control what file comes
from where. I will leave Pootle as source. If you decide to not
Great, thank you. This enables cont. l10n based on Pootle.
-Frank
On 20.12.2010 10:19, Branislav Klocok wrote:
Dňa Po 13. December 2010 Ivo Hinkelmann napísal (On Po 13. December
2010 Ivo Hinkelmann wrote):
all I can do is to either remove sk from this list or from pootle.
Sadly I don't have
Hi Michael,
gd is part of the Pootle system, why you want provide your own file by
this URL list? We can only use one sdf file, from pootle or from this list.
Cheers,
Ivo
Michael Bauer wrote:
gd too please.
Michael
while looking through all active languages in Pavels list I saw that
Hi,
there is an ga also in Pootle. Did you requested the migration to
Pootle? We can only use one file, either by Pootle or by this URL list.
So in case you don't use pootle we have to remove it there.
Cheers,
Ivo
Kevin Scannell wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 5:38 AM, Ivo Hinkelmann
Sorry, you're right, my mistake!
Michael
13/12/2010 11:55, Sgrìobh Ivo Hinkelmann:
Hi Michael,
gd is part of the Pootle system, why you want provide your own file by
this URL list? We can only use one sdf file, from pootle or from this
list.
Cheers,
Ivo
Michael Bauer wrote:
gd too
Hi,
all I can do is to either remove sk from this list or from pootle. Sadly
I don't have a better mechanism to control what file comes from where. I
will leave Pootle as source. If you decide to not use Pootle please tell
me then I can remove it from Pootle thus the URL list is used again.
Hi Andrea,
the development nearly stopped on the OOO330 code line. It does not make
sense to use this code line as there will be no further milestones. And
it is planed to integrate the l10n as well.
We should use the DEV300 now and as soon as the OOO340 code line opens
we go onto this.
Ivo Hinkelmann wrote:
the development nearly stopped on the OOO330 code line. It does not make
sense to use this code line as there will be no further milestones.
Well, I was not mentioning to base the workflow of it, but just to reuse
portions of the mechanism applied to DEV300 to re-roll
