On Tue, 11 Jun 2024 23:17:52 -0400
bill-auger wrote:
> there are a few problems with this one - most significantly, you did
> not update the pkgver or the pkgrel - the repo would not accept that
> package because it has the identical filename as the existing one -
> at the very least, the pkgrel
there are a few problems with this one - most significantly, you did not update
the pkgver or the pkgrel - the repo would not accept that package because it
has the identical filename as the existing one - at the very least, the pkgrel
needs to be bumped - but it is not obvious what pkgver represen
