BTW, the build of 129.0.2 was successful with that patch.
I haven't tried to build without it.
On Friday, August 16th, 2024 at 6:43 PM, grizzlyuser
wrote:
> I haven't tried it, but Arch Linux added a patch to their repo, that seems
> related: 0004-Bug-1912663-Fix-some-b
I haven't tried it, but Arch Linux added a patch to their repo, that seems
related: 0004-Bug-1912663-Fix-some-build-issues-with-cbindgen-0.27.patch
On Wednesday, August 14th, 2024 at 9:52 AM, bill-auger
wrote:
> the x86_64 build fails - any ideas?
>
> | 0:46.59 ./rust_helper.h.stub
> | 0:47.0
The reason is simple: I couldn't find enough free time for that, and was
mostly focused on getting the release out ASAP, due to security fixes. This
thing can come later, because it doesn't seem to be active and/or
user-facing anyway.
Agreed, removing mobile/ makes sense, but needs some testing, t
Hello,
I saw iceweasel 1:105.0.2-1.parabola1 appeared in the repos, but there seem to
be no accompanying changes to the git repo [1]. Checked that as well by pulling
the latest changes from the master branch. Would somebody having these changes
please commit and push them? Thanks!
[1] https://
Hi,
Are there any guidelines or description of the process to follow to create pull
requests on Pagure?
I find the current state of things confusing. On Pagure, there are 'master' and
'pull-requests' branches, both of which look out of sync with 'master' branch
in the main Parabola git repo. S
> IIRC, there is no master branch on pagure, only 'iceweasel' and
>
> 'pull-requests' - probably the new ACL is only preventing your
>
> from creating new branches - can you push to the 'iceweasel' or
>
> 'pull-requests' branches ? - if you can not, then the others
>
> also can not either - i may h
Hello. I've pushed a commit to Pagure yesterday [1], but was not sure how to
create a PR. I used to push fresh master branch to Pagure, then push my changes
to feature branch (iceweasel), then open PR from iceweasel to master. But
yesterday my attempt to push master got rejected. So if anybody k
Hello everyone, and a huge thanks to all who maintained the grub package in the
past!
This is just a notification that GRUB 2.06 has been released:
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/grub.git/
Arch Linux has already updated their package.
___
Dev mailin
> grizzlyuser (or anyone) could you check the newtab page search
> box - i noticed that i can not type or paste anything into it -
> could that be related to the re4mote settings changes?
>From the diff between 88.0.1 and 89.0, it looks like the following preference
>has been s
Greetings!
A new major version of pacman is available:
https://git.archlinux.org/pacman.git/
The package is still marked as out of date in Parabola for some reason, so
sending this notification by email instead of the form from website.
___
Dev mail
For me, this one did work fine too (in KDE Plasma, taskbar was set to use 48x48
icons too). Even after removing and installing iceweasel 1:88.0-1.parabola1 for
x86_64 from the official repos.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, April 30, 2021 8:07 AM, bill-auger
wrote:
> the only bug
ofile.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, April 30, 2021 7:37 AM, bill-auger
wrote:
> grizzlyuser -
>
> do you know what these errors may be? - they appear to be
> harmless; but i dont like the word "exception" there - it
> looks like there is one reported for each instal
I tried to build i686 today, and it failed. I've updated the description in the
PR to include them.
___
Dev mailing list
Dev@lists.parabola.nu
https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
e references to other such
services, like DuckDuckGo search and replace them with self-hostable ones.
re: i686, sounds good. But unfortunately I won't have time to check this out
until this weekend.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, April 6, 2021 5:34 PM, bill-auger
wrote:
&g
Hi!
This is a notification that octopi has been updated upstream and in AUR:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aarnt/octopi/master/CHANGELOG
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/octopi/
I don't know why, but although the package in pcr has been updated quickly
after the previous notification, it
16G of RAM+swap
usage.From 8cf2a6b3b0baef28446b8aace5f83ebae685574a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: grizzlyuser
Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2020 18:23:37 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] libre/iceweasel: Clean ignored files from tarball
---
libre/iceweasel/PKGBUILD | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
dif
irefox package for the latest
release version.From 0ed8ba52170f5b9dca13ff834ac567f7d2c62f32 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: grizzlyuser
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 20:35:40 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] iceweasel: adding missed changes from latest patch
---
libre/iceweasel/iceweasel.desktop | 2 +
In my understanding, the following two sentences of the FSDG
pretty much cover the JS issue:
> A free system distribution must not steer users towards obtaining any nonfree
> information for practical use, or encourage them to do so.
> Programs in the system should not suggest installing nonfree
On Friday, June 26, 2020 11:39 PM, bill-auger
wrote:
> the javascript is really not the issue in this case - the "app
> stores" themselves conflict directly with the FSDG; because
> those websites offer downloads of non-free programs - also, if
> the only purpose of those URLs, is to suggest t
On Thursday, June 25, 2020 7:09 AM, bill-auger
wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Jun 2020 21:04:29 +0000 grizzlyuser wrote:
>
>
> > const release = {
> > -- title: "What’s New in DevTools (Firefox 76)",
> > -+ title: "What’s New in DevTools (Iceweasel 76)",
age of the latest version, I
suppose this error should resolve by itself after the next sync
of the repos.
[1] https://git.parabola.nu/packages/iceweasel.git/
From 4a2a95542af55280db56f3b48c446aa208f22c09 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: grizzlyuser
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2020 22:58:48 +0300
Subject: [PATCH
kages/iceweasel.git/ [2]
https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/2767
From 0ea141041fa21a26df4cea66d5ae520ec136bb26 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: grizzlyuser
Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 20:40:35 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] Bump version, update patches
---
release.sh | 2 +-
.../Al
as it's hard for me to predict what
the checksum of the -libre source tarball will be.
From 2855b1c80e8bceaffc5371cf36a5cffcbe186af3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: grizzlyuser
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2020 12:10:40 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] libre/ark 20.04.0-1.par1 New version
---
libre/ark/PKG
Please find the description of the change in the commit message
from the attached patch.
Built locally for x86_64, i686, armv7h.
From 0716c95da34d97c564f2b9c1be3077f33849e019 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: grizzlyuser
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 12:52:20 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] libre/kio 5.69.0-1
Thank you for your help with updates of this and other packages!
___
Dev mailing list
Dev@lists.parabola.nu
https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
Please find the description of the changes in the commit message
from the attached patch.
Built for x86_64, armv7h and i686
From 487aea95bb49882a8314510988f0f61fa2b5e979 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: grizzlyuser
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 14:46:49 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] libre/iceweasel-l10n: Bump
2001
From: grizzlyuser
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2020 11:45:44 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] libre/iceweasel 75.0-1: Bump version and refresh patch
accordingly
Please note checksum for patch hasn't been updated yet since more
changes are needed to it.
---
libre/iceweasel/PKGBUILD| 6 +++---
libre
keep in mind that it has NOT been built for any
architecture yet, so may fail at any given moment. The build for
x86_64 is in progress on my machine right now.
[1] https://git.parabola.nu/packages/iceweasel.git/
From fc0d48dfd9c95ff24a9622535c3fc9a1ebd07117 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: grizzl
Hi!
Please find the patches attached with changes described in
commit messages.
Built on x86_64, i686 and armv7h.
From c8b0f74fbf120cfc2575bfcc62093e3e49b36192 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: grizzlyuser
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2020 14:02:57 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] libre/file-roller 3.36.1: Bump
Hi,
Thank you for the update! No problem with the commit 5.
I agree, this probably needs some discussion first.
___
Dev mailing list
Dev@lists.parabola.nu
https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
ated librechroot from scratch, it builds. I've seen
that error some time before when Arch Linux ARM repos had the
older version of extra-cmake-modules. Please check the chroot is
up to date.
Thank you for applying the changes and updating the packages!
From c9c710ae640127de2eec829de0ffa58
Forgot to mention a few things:
Successfully built on x86_64, i686, armv7h.
kio should be built at least before ark, okular and
libksysguard, because they depend on it.
___
Dev mailing list
Dev@lists.parabola.nu
https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinf
Please find patches attached.
As usual, each patch has change description in the commit
message. Any comments/questions/concerns are welcome!
From 4e9b5e27c36d9cd0daa93934d50babc763ae8eb4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: grizzlyuser
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 12:37:01 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] Sync
. If something is not OK, please just disregard the
last commit.
> On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 21:52:25 + grizzlyuser wrote:
>
> > --- a/libre/iceweasel/PKGBUILD
> > +++ b/libre/iceweasel/PKGBUILD
> > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
> >
> > Maintainer (alarm): Kevin Mihelich ke...@
//repo.parabola.nu/other/iceweasel/iceweasel_70.0-1.branding.tar.xz
[2] https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/2488#note-8
From a8ca0a93ba35c8d5df77fe00b4d8bb5234150c35 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: grizzlyuser
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 11:44:31 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] Sync with chan
included in all the patches, please refer to
them for explanations of the changes.
From e5eedd5dbca84123f784c483239cebcff2c7665c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: grizzlyuser
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 11:44:31 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] Sync with changes from Arch Linux Firefox 73.0-1
Please excuse me for not mentioning this initially, but the
following make option for ARM has been copied from Arch ARM
sources:
mk_add_options MOZ_MAKE_FLAGS="-j2"
I'm not sure why do they need it in the first place, probably
for stable building on their machines or actual ARM hardware. If
that'
what reason.
From 3f4f008784d894819a8b244e8a3f593aabf2d3a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: grizzlyuser
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 22:43:00 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] Sync with changes from Arch Firefox 72.0.2-1
---
libre/iceweasel/PKGBUILD | 32
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
I guess some of the changes from the patch might need a discussion first. As
usual, questions / comments are welcome!
___
Dev mailing list
Dev@lists.parabola.nu
https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
Hello,
Below is a patch to update Iceweasel to 71.0. Built and tested it
on x86_64 with brand new fresh profile after ~/.mozilla folder
removal. I didn't try to make it build on other architectures,
as according to package search on Arch Linux ARM & 32 websites,
they have not yet updated theirs.
On Saturday, November 23, 2019 7:04 PM, bill-auger
wrote:
> i had the same thought recently too - grizzlyuser has also been
> very helpful
It's very pleasant to see myself mentioned in this thread! Seing
dedication of Parabola hackers to the project inspired me to do
my small contrib
Does anybody have any thoughts on that? I wonder what are the best next steps
to do with this issue, if it's an issue indeed.
___
Dev mailing list
Dev@lists.parabola.nu
https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
I noticed a few non-blacklisted packages that contain PDF files with embedded
non-free fonts. As FSDG applies to fonts too [1], I'd like to start (or
continue some old) discussion about the issue and ways to resolve it.
For example, FontForge can be used to find embedded fonts in PDF file in
qu
I forgot to note that I tested this only for x86_64 and not for other
architectures. Don't have time for that currently and hope that at least it's
better than nothing.
___
Dev mailing list
Dev@lists.parabola.nu
https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinf
New version of Firefox has various security fixes [1]. I didn't dig deep into
new "surprises" that Mozilla constantly brings to us. And of course, Iceweasel
is far from polished state. But it looks like getting a new working build is
better security-wise. Please find patches in the attachments.
Li
FYI: Firefox 70 has been released [1], and Arch Linux already updated their
package.
[1] https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/notes/
___
Dev mailing list
Dev@lists.parabola.nu
https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
Two packages got recently removed from the blacklist [1], which makes me
wonder: is there any established process of removal of such packages from
[libre] repo?
At this moment, when I issue, for example:
# pacman -Syu kio-extras
It tries to install libre/kio-extras. The newer version of this
On Wednesday, June 12, 2019 8:26 PM, Andreas Grapentin
wrote:
> This is a good point -- why does this not happen when syncing through
> the redirector? Does that always sync the .db.tar.* files from a
> parabola mirror on -Sy?
I have no access to what's running on redirector, so don't know for
On Wednesday, June 12, 2019 12:06 PM, Andreas Grapentin
wrote:
> Come to think of it, there already is another way that works with an
> unmodified pacman. pacman does not mandate that all repos use a single
> mirror list. You could configure a system that has a list of arch
> mirrors in mirrorlis
Please excuse me if I miss the point, but instead of using the redirector,
can't pacman logic be modified to solve the problem the redirector tries to
solve?
For example, to have the second mirrorlist exclusively for fallback Arch Linux
mirrors, so the user can choose which of them to fall back
Sure, added my findings to the report.
___
Dev mailing list
Dev@lists.parabola.nu
https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
#x27;ll happily look at your patch!
>
> Best,
> A
>
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 08:59:48AM +, grizzlyuser wrote:
>
> > I was able to compile Iceweasel 66.0.1 with minor changes to PKGBUILD and
> > existing patches, and with patch Arch added for [1]. I didn'
I was able to compile Iceweasel 66.0.1 with minor changes to PKGBUILD and
existing patches, and with patch Arch added for [1]. I didn't review the
changes of this new Firefox version for new freedom issues or antifeatures,
though. If anyone needs patches, please ping me.
I asked about this on #
53 matches
Mail list logo
