Re: [VOTE] [log4xx] Release log4cxx 0.11.0

2020-08-22 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag Ralph Goers, am Freitag, 21. August 2020 um 23:42 schrieben Sie: > At this point I am not sure how to update the site. TL;DR: The site describing the latest release is not supposed to be updated from MASTER. Sources need to be merged to "latest_stable", revision numbers, release dates

Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Release Logging Parent POM version 3

2020-08-22 Thread Matt Sicker
Hearing no objections, I'll continue with this release. On Sun, 16 Aug 2020 at 13:53, Matt Sicker wrote: > > It's been over two years since the last parent POM release. In that > time, its own parent POM has been upgraded from version 19 to version > 23. We don't really have any other explicit ch

Re: [VOTE] [log4xx] Release log4cxx 0.11.0

2020-08-22 Thread Ralph Goers
I didn’t try to run the build from master. I checked out the release tag. The normal process with the maven release plugin is to update the version to the release version on master, create a tag, and then update the version to the next development version. The release build is then performed by

Re: [VOTE] [log4xx] Release log4cxx 0.11.0

2020-08-22 Thread Ralph Goers
Please disregard the last sentence below. The site must have been cached. It shows 0.11.0 now. Ralph > On Aug 22, 2020, at 10:04 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > I didn’t try to run the build from master. I checked out the release tag. The > normal process with the maven release plugin is to update

Re: [VOTE] [log4xx] Release log4cxx 0.11.0

2020-08-22 Thread Ralph Goers
Wow. I just noticed that it was 12 years since the last release. A little overdue I think. Great going guys. Keep up the good work! Ralph > On Aug 22, 2020, at 10:07 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > Please disregard the last sentence below. The site must have been cached. It > shows 0.11.0 now. >

Log4cxx version

2020-08-22 Thread Ralph Goers
In looking at the log4cxx changelog I can’t help notice that the first release was 17 years ago. After all these years one would expect that the version should have hit 1.0.0 at least 10-15 years ago. Isn’t it time to correct that? Ralph

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4Net 2.0.9

2020-08-22 Thread Dominik Psenner
Hi I recall that we were forced to transform the nuget account Apache.Logging ( https://www.nuget.org/profiles/Apache.Logging) from a personal account into an organization. I am currently the only member and administrator of that organization. Please share with me (may also be in private) the nuge

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4Net 2.0.9

2020-08-22 Thread Davyd McColl
I know I'm quite new, but I'm happy to push approved packages. My Microsoft account for nuget is this email address (dav...@gmail.com) -d On August 22, 2020 19:46:45 Dominik Psenner wrote: Hi I recall that we were forced to transform the nuget account Apache.Logging ( https://www.nuget.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4Net 2.0.9

2020-08-22 Thread Dominik Psenner
Apparently it cant be the email but must be the nuget accounts username, apologies. -- Sent from my phone. Typos are a kind gift to anyone who happens to find them. On Sat, Aug 22, 2020, 20:39 Davyd McColl wrote: > I know I'm quite new, but I'm happy to push approved packages. My > Microsoft >

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4Net 2.0.9

2020-08-22 Thread Davyd McColl
Oh ok, well, mine is davydm (: -d On August 22, 2020 20:49:59 Dominik Psenner wrote: Apparently it cant be the email but must be the nuget accounts username, apologies. -- Sent from my phone. Typos are a kind gift to anyone who happens to find them. On Sat, Aug 22, 2020, 20:39 Davyd McColl

Re: Log4cxx version

2020-08-22 Thread Stephen Webb
I would completely support that change. On Sun, Aug 23, 2020, 3:14 AM Ralph Goers wrote: > In looking at the log4cxx changelog I can’t help notice that the first > release was 17 years ago. After all these years one would expect that the > version should have hit 1.0.0 at least 10-15 years ago.

Re: Log4cxx version

2020-08-22 Thread Robert Middleton
I'm working on changes for log4cxx at the moment that involve upgrades to use C++11 features; that would definitely require a major change in the versioning, although the API would be largely the same. Part of the question with that as well is what platforms and compilers are supported, as Thorste

Re: GitHub Actions CI failure on release-2.x

2020-08-22 Thread Matt Sicker
Ok, so whatever the issue is is a problem in both branches now. On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 at 09:56, Matt Sicker wrote: > > I’ve been modifying build settings in master lately that haven’t been merged > back to this branch. I’d assume there’s a difference in the pom file here. > I’ll take a closer loo

Re: Log4cxx version

2020-08-22 Thread Ralph Goers
That is for those involved in the C++ development to decide but I would wonder a) Besides updating the compiler are there other architectural improvements that should be made. b) How much will the code diverge - would it be possible to share the code that is in common somehow or would that just g