I know I'm quite new, but I'm happy to push approved packages. My Microsoft account for nuget is this email address (dav...@gmail.com)

-d


On August 22, 2020 19:46:45 Dominik Psenner <dpsen...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi

I recall that we were forced to transform the nuget account Apache.Logging (
https://www.nuget.org/profiles/Apache.Logging) from a personal account into
an organization. I am currently the only member and administrator of that
organization. Please share with me (may also be in private) the nuget
account (most probably the email of your microsoft account) if you want me
to add you to the organization. Any member of the pmc may also become
administrator of that group if he wishes to.

While I try to process your requests as fast as possible, please give me
some days. I am at the beach with the family and tend to swim and dive in
moments when I do not build sandcastles with the kids. ;-)

Best regards
Dominik
--
Sent from my phone. Typos are a kind gift to anyone who happens to find
them.

On Sat, Aug 22, 2020, 02:01 Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:

And, FWIW, Nuget won’t let me register with my apache.org <
http://apache.org/> email address saying it can’t be a work or school
email.

Ralph

> On Aug 21, 2020, at 4:46 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
wrote:
>
> This gets better and better. I was able to decrypt the file but the
credentials don’t work.  The Nuget.org <http://nuget.org/> site says
“NuGet.org <http://nuget.org/> password login in no longer supported.
Please use a Microsoft account to sign into NuGet gallery.”
>
> Ralph
>
>> On Aug 21, 2020, at 4:37 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
wrote:
>>
>> Going back through my old emails I see Dominik had the same problem in
2016. I forgot to update my files and now I see the instructions have
changed.
>>
>> Ralph
>>
>>> On Aug 21, 2020, at 4:27 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
wrote:
>>>
>>> I figured out that the document is now at home.apache.org <
http://home.apache.org/>. Unfortunately, that didn’t do me any good. gpg
-d is failing with “No secret key”. That doesn’t seem too surprising since
my key wasn’t used to sign the document.
>>>
>>> Ralph
>>>
>>>> On Aug 21, 2020, at 3:53 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Dominik,
>>>>
>>>> The README file says that the keys can be found at
https://people.apache.org/keys/group/logging-pmc.asc <
https://people.apache.org/keys/group/logging-pmc.asc>.  That url returns
a 404. Any idea where it moved to?
>>>>
>>>> Ralph
>>>>
>>>>> On Aug 17, 2020, at 9:39 AM, Dominik Psenner <dpsen...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I guess that would be a nuget publish.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/nuget/nuget-org/publish-a-package
>>>>>
>>>>> The credentials to that account are stored in the private repos of
logging
>>>>> pmc. Most members of the pmc should be in the set of recipients with
their
>>>>> gpg key.
>>>>> --
>>>>> Sent from my phone. Typos are a kind gift to anyone who happens to
find
>>>>> them.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2020, 08:56 Davyd McColl <dav...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Great!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How do we get the nupkg to nuget.org? This is the final step that
most
>>>>>> users are going to be interested in.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Having a look at what's at the url you posted, I have ideas on how
to
>>>>>> streamline future releases, so the next time I'm in that area, I'm
>>>>>> definitely implementing those ideas. I don't see changes to the
Release
>>>>>> Notes area -- if I were to try to streamline that into a release,
would a
>>>>>> CHANGELOG file be useful? Or is there a better way?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -d
>>>>>> On 2020/08/16 23:26:07, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> I committed them to dist already. I don't know how long we should
wait
>>>>>> for any mirroring to catch up, though on my end, I see updated
>>>>>> artifacts on https://downloads.apache.org/logging/log4net/ other
than
>>>>>> the release notes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2020 at 15:09, Ralph Goers wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 to that!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Let me know when these are published. I can update the web site to
>>>>>> reflect that it is no longer dormant.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ralph
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Aug 16, 2020, at 11:54 AM, Matt Sicker wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks so much for your help in releasing this!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2020 at 13:53, Davyd McColl wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'll make changes to the automated build to affect all changes
you
>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>> made (and perhaps will make) automatically to future releases
for the
>>>>>> next
>>>>>>>>> release. Apologies for making this more difficult than it needs
to be
>>>>>> (:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -d
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On August 16, 2020 20:37:01 Matt Sicker wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Just a simple copy of the LICENSE and NOTICE file into the
binaries
>>>>>>>>>> zip, and a rename of the files to include "apache" in the name.
I've
>>>>>>>>>> uploaded them to dist along with updating the KEYS file for
log4net,
>>>>>>>>>> though that should probably be merged together with the
project-wide
>>>>>>>>>> KEYS file in the parent directory. There's an outdated
README.html in
>>>>>>>>>> the directory still containing the old release notes, but we can
>>>>>>>>>> address that next.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2020 at 13:12, Matt Sicker wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> One issue I found in one of the artifacts that I can address
before
>>>>>>>>>>> uploading since it wasn't signed is the binaries zip is
missing the
>>>>>>>>>>> LICENSE file. I'm not sure if there's a standard way to
include that
>>>>>>>>>>> in the nupkg file, but I did see that in its metadata, it
explicitly
>>>>>>>>>>> says the code is Apache2 licensed at least.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2020 at 13:03, Matt Sicker wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll sign and publish the artifacts today.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 3 Aug 2020 at 17:43, Ralph Goers wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Remko. That makes 3 +1 votes from PMC members.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ralph
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 3, 2020, at 2:12 PM, Remko Popma wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 Remko.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 1:04 AM Matt Sicker wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 from me. We can handle the release signing afterwards as
>>>>>> Ralph
>>>>>>>>>>> suggests.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 3 Aug 2020 at 10:30, Ralph Goers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can other PMC members please review this? It has been more
>>>>>> than 72
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hours.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ralph
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 30, 2020, at 11:17 PM, Davyd McColl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, I've never done this before, so bear with me if I
>>>>>> fluff it:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is a proposed vote to release log4net 2.0.9 from PR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/pull/61
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Release artifacts (including source zip) are at:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
https://ci.appveyor.com/project/fluffynuts/logging-log4net/builds/34063235/artifacts
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source can be checked out from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://github.com/fluffynuts/logging-log4net/logging-log4net,
>>>>>> tag rel/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.0.9. I can't push tags to the upstream, but this tag is
>>>>>> exactly the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> same commit as the last in the PR mentioned above, which
was
>>>>>>>>>>> accepted into
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> master a few days ago.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please check out the artifacts & if everyone is ok with
>>>>>> what's there,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> please can someone with the rights to publish to nuget do
so.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Once I've seen how this process works, I'd like to
tackle the
>>>>>> CVE that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has been brought up on this list more than once -- it's a
>>>>>> simple change
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which was already committed to the develop branch some time
>>>>>> ago, so
>>>>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are a couple of options here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. cherry-pick that commit & do a 2.0.10 release pronto,
with
>>>>>> only
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that change
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. trawl the develop branch to see what else was already
>>>>>> solved in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there, and get that out as 2.0.10, and perhaps close out
that
>>>>>> branch to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> avoid future confusion.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your time
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -d
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Matt Sicker
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>


Reply via email to