RE: Re: log4net

2021-12-14 Thread David Schwartz
Hi Joe, Adding to what Davyd wrote. I just searched the codebase and the JndiLookup class (where the log4j vulnerability was found) does not exist in log4net. In fact, there is no code related to jndi at all as far as I can see. David -Original Message- From: Davyd McColl Sent: Tues

Re: Re: [Vote] Release log4net 2.0.13-rc2

2021-10-31 Thread David Schwartz
Not sure I qualify to vote, but looks good to me +1 David Schwartz Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> From: Ralph Goers Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2021 6:55:48 PM To: dev@logging.apache.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Vote] Release log4net 2.0.

RE: Re: Fix for Issue Log4net-611

2021-10-24 Thread David Schwartz
even though I'm the only one maintaining it right now. Thanks for the pr - I'll try check it out tomorrow. -d On October 24, 2021 11:29:52 David Schwartz wrote: > Hi Log4Net, > > I have a PR to repair issue 611 for .netstandard 2.0 libraries. > > https://urldefense.c

Fix for Issue Log4net-611

2021-10-24 Thread David Schwartz
://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/pull/76 I need this as part of the migration plan of our products to .net standard / .net 5. Could someone please review/approve the PR and then release a new version of log4net with this change? Thank you David Schwartz NI