[jira] Created: (SOLR-1942) Ability to select codec per field

2010-06-06 Thread Yonik Seeley (JIRA)
Ability to select codec per field - Key: SOLR-1942 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1942 Project: Solr Issue Type: New Feature Affects Versions: 4.0 Reporter: Yonik Seeley

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-1942) Ability to select codec per field

2010-06-06 Thread Hoss Man (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1942?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12876064#action_12876064 ] Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1942: something to consider is wether we just want to make it con

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-2490) 'ant generate-maven-artifacts' should work for lucene+solr 3.x+

2010-06-06 Thread Ryan McKinley (JIRA)
'ant generate-maven-artifacts' should work for lucene+solr 3.x+ --- Key: LUCENE-2490 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2490 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Task

lucene-dev.jar vs lucene-SNAPSHOT.jar

2010-06-06 Thread Ryan McKinley
(hoping to avoid an anti-maven flame war) I'm looking at getting the ant tasks to play nice with maven again. In solr, there is a way to have the .jar files be "-dev.jar" but have the artifacts still map to -SNAPSHOT.jar. Getting the lucene ant scripts to do this is beyond my ant mojo, so it lead

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2490) 'ant generate-maven-artifacts' should work for lucene+solr 3.x+

2010-06-06 Thread Ryan McKinley (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ryan McKinley updated LUCENE-2490: -- Attachment: LUCENE-2490-maven.patch this lets lucene get built as 'lucene-3.1-dev' and builds

Re: lucene-dev.jar vs lucene-SNAPSHOT.jar

2010-06-06 Thread Simon Willnauer
Can't you simply build it with ant -Ddev.version=4.0-SNAPSHOT that should build a jar with the corresponding artifacts. simon On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote: > (hoping to avoid an anti-maven flame war) > > I'm looking at getting the ant tasks to play nice with maven again. >

Re: lucene-dev.jar vs lucene-SNAPSHOT.jar

2010-06-06 Thread Ryan McKinley
ah yes, that would work... still not great for integrating with solr and keeping the versions in sync though. As a one-off just for me, that works fine, but I wonder more about getting snapshot builds as part of the hudson build scripts. perhaps 3.x, 4.x would be a good time to change some file n

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2142) FieldCache.getStringIndex should not throw exception if term count exceeds doc count

2010-06-06 Thread Koji Sekiguchi (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12876102#action_12876102 ] Koji Sekiguchi commented on LUCENE-2142: {quote} I think we should simply remove t

Re: lucene-dev.jar vs lucene-SNAPSHOT.jar

2010-06-06 Thread Simon Willnauer
I personally don't really care if it is called dev or SNAPSHOT. If it helps other people to integrate current trunk code more easily and in turn use the latest code for development I think we should do it. Maybe I miss something why this is super important to be called "-dev" if so please let me kn