[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-2324:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-2324.patch
Ok, TestNRTThreads works after 10+ iterations. TestStress
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12983018#action_12983018
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-2316:
Does this affect trunk also, or just the 3.x branch
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:42 PM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> H, a fresh, unmodified checkout of Solr will fail on my Windows7 box if
> I run "ant -Dtestcase=VelocityResponseWriterTest test". It succeeds on my
> Mac. Anyone got a clue? Or should I look into it? Of course it succeeds in
> IntelliJ.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12982997#action_12982997
]
Lance Norskog commented on SOLR-445:
bq. 2> From the original post, rolling this back wil
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-trunk/1429/
All tests passed
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 16590 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands,
H, a fresh, unmodified checkout of Solr will fail on my Windows7 box if
I run "ant -Dtestcase=VelocityResponseWriterTest test". It succeeds on my
Mac. Anyone got a clue? Or should I look into it? Of course it succeeds in
IntelliJ. S
The error reported is:
junit-sequential:
[ju
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-3.x/245/
All tests passed
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 21049 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-2654.
-
Resolution: Duplicate
duplicate of LUCENE-2872
> bulk-code each chunk b/w indexed terms in the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2872:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2872.patch
Patch.
I think it's basically working, but there are
Terms dict should block-encode terms
Key: LUCENE-2872
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2872
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Index
Reporter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12982931#action_12982931
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2374:
-
nice work uwe!! +1 ;)
> Add reflection
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2547?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer resolved LUCENE-2547.
-
Resolution: Won't Fix
moving out
> minimize autoboxing in NumericField
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2547?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12982928#action_12982928
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2547:
---
That's I am talking about, don't clutter AP
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2547?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12982927#action_12982927
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2547:
-
bq. I didn't dive deep into the details
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12982926#action_12982926
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
Looks like TestNRTThreads is still so
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12982921#action_12982921
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2374:
-
+1, this looks great.
i think its really impor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2374:
--
Attachment: shot4.png
shot3.png
> Add reflection API to AttributeSource/Attrib
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2374:
--
Attachment: shot2.png
shot1.png
LUCENE-2374-3x.patch
New patch
I am hoping that it'll be in 2011... but don't hold me to that. It's
really not possible to predict!
You can always use a trunk version and give feedback :)
But beware that it's "unsable", meaning APIs and the index format can
suddenly change.
Mike
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Gregor Heinr
Yes!
Mike
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 7:47 AM, Shai Erera wrote:
> This sounds like incremental field updates :).
>
> Shai
>
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Michael McCandless
> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Jason Rutherglen
>> wrote:
>> >> But: they don't yet support updating
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-2324:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-2324.patch
Very nice! Looks like we needed all kinds of IW syncs? I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12982900#action_12982900
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2324:
---
My last commit yesterday made almost all te
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12982888#action_12982888
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2236:
-
bq. So let's keep that name (Similarity)
OK,
On 1/17/11 12:27 PM, Steven A Rowe wrote:
This makes zero sense to me - no one will ever make their own POMs
I did :) (for a different project though).
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additiona
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12982872#action_12982872
]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-2236:
-
{quote}
well my concern about the deprecated me
On 1/17/2011 at 3:05 PM, Michael Busch wrote:
> On 1/17/11 8:06 AM, Steven A Rowe wrote:
> > On 1/17/2011 at 1:53 AM, Michael Busch wrote:
> >> I don't think any user needs the ability to run an ant target on
> >> Lucene's sources to produce maven artifacts
> > I want to be able to make modificatio
On 1/17/11 8:06 AM, Steven A Rowe wrote:
On 1/17/2011 at 1:53 AM, Michael Busch wrote:
I don't think any user needs the ability to run an ant target on
Lucene's sources to produce maven artifacts
I want to be able to make modifications to the Lucene source, install Maven
snapshot artifacts in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved SOLR-2160.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Marking as fixed... please reopen if you think there might still be a bug,
but agai
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved SOLR-2269.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 1060057, 1060058 (3x)
> contrib entries in solr/CHANGES.txt shou
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2315?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12982822#action_12982822
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-2315:
-
I found the bug, will fix together with analysis.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2657?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12982797#action_12982797
]
Chris A. Mattmann commented on LUCENE-2657:
---
Hey Guys,
I've set this up on some
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12982794#action_12982794
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-2269:
---
I just realized I've made the same mistake (somehow,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved SOLR-2259.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> Improve analyzer/version handling in Solr
> --
On 1/17/2011 at 11:25 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Steven A Rowe wrote:
> > On 1/17/2011 at 1:53 AM, Michael Busch wrote:
> >> I don't think any user needs the ability to run an ant target on
> >> Lucene's sources to produce maven artifacts
> >
> > I want to be able t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-849?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Otis Gospodnetic resolved SOLR-849.
---
Resolution: Duplicate
Implemented in SOLR-2099.
> Add bwlimit support to snappuller
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2474?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12982761#action_12982761
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2474:
--
bq. Still, I think that using CopyOnWriteArra
On Jan 17, 2011, at 8:06 AM, Steven A Rowe wrote:
> On 1/17/2011 at 1:53 AM, Michael Busch wrote:
>> I don't think any user needs the ability to run an ant target on
>> Lucene's sources to produce maven artifacts
>
> I want to be able to make modifications to the Lucene source, install Maven
> s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved SOLR-2261.
---
Resolution: Fixed
This was not downloading the file at all, instead it was getting a 404 error as
Eri
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2374:
--
Summary: Add reflection API to AttributeSource/AttributeImpl (was: Add
introspection API to A
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated SOLR-2279:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.1)
moving out.. i don't see myself fixing this test issue very quickly.
> Ad
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler closed LUCENE-2552.
-
Resolution: Duplicate
Lucene Fields: (was: [New])
Duplicate of LUCENE-2720
> If index
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated SOLR-1674:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.1)
(was: 1.5)
> improve analysis tests, cut over to ne
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12982740#action_12982740
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-1674:
---
i'd still like to add posinc tests for some of these
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2832:
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.1)
I am removing 3.1 as I think its the safest option.
We can revisit
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Earwin Burrfoot wrote:
> You're not alone. :)
> But, I bet, much more people would like to skip that step and have
> their artifacts downloaded from central.
Maybe, but perhaps they will need to compromise and use jar files or
install into their local themselves,
You're not alone. :)
But, I bet, much more people would like to skip that step and have
their artifacts downloaded from central.
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 19:06, Steven A Rowe wrote:
> On 1/17/2011 at 1:53 AM, Michael Busch wrote:
>> I don't think any user needs the ability to run an ant target on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2474?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12982695#action_12982695
]
Shay Banon commented on LUCENE-2474:
Yea, I got the reasoning for Set, we can use that
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Steven A Rowe wrote:
> On 1/17/2011 at 1:53 AM, Michael Busch wrote:
>> I don't think any user needs the ability to run an ant target on
>> Lucene's sources to produce maven artifacts
>
> I want to be able to make modifications to the Lucene source, install Maven
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12982692#action_12982692
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2832:
-
In this case, its very extreme. the user had 1.
On 1/17/2011 at 1:53 AM, Michael Busch wrote:
> I don't think any user needs the ability to run an ant target on
> Lucene's sources to produce maven artifacts
I want to be able to make modifications to the Lucene source, install Maven
snapshot artifacts in my local repository, then depend on thos
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12982682#action_12982682
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2832:
---
Sorry my last comment was stupid, as 1/8 of
Another data point: the standard query parser actually ALSO fails when you do
anything other than a *:* query. When you specify a field name, it returns
zero results:
root@duck93:/data/solr-dym/solr-dym# curl
"http://localhost:8983/solr/nose/standard?q=value_0:a*";
07value_0:a*
But:
root@
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12982675#action_12982675
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2832:
---
I would suggest to use a different default
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2374:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-2374-3x.patch
Here a first patch with the proposed API (thanks Earwin).
Th
> Better would be a stacked approach, where the orig full array remains
> and we write sparse deltas (pairs of docID + new value), and at init
> we load the base and apply all the diffs (in order). Merging would
> periodically coalesce them down again...
I think this approach would be great for t
Hi folks,
I'm sorely puzzled by the fact that my QParser implementation ceased to work
after the latest Solr/Lucene trunk update. My previous update was about ten
days ago, right after Mike made his index changes.
The symptom is that, although the query parser is correctly called, and seems
t
Hi all,
I'm having an issue when highlighting fields that have overlapping tokens.
There was a bug opened in Jira some year ago
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-627 but I'm a bit confused about
this. In jira bug's status is "resolved", but still I got the exact same
problem with a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12982216#action_12982216
]
Gunnlaugur Thor Briem edited comment on SOLR-1191 at 1/17/11 10:24 AM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12982216#action_12982216
]
Gunnlaugur Thor Briem edited comment on SOLR-1191 at 1/17/11 10:25 AM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gunnlaugur Thor Briem updated SOLR-1191:
Comment: was deleted
(was: Neglected to mention: that patch is against branch_3x.)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12982216#action_12982216
]
Gunnlaugur Thor Briem edited comment on SOLR-1191 at 1/17/11 10:23 AM:
---
> Seriously, how would you do it?
Ah, for LUCENE-2312 we don't need to update existing values, we only
need to make additions, ie, it's not the general use case. I got the
impression that DocValues should be used instead of CSF? Does CSF
replace the FieldCache usage entirely?
> Better would be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1604?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12982651#action_12982651
]
Salman Akram commented on SOLR-1604:
I am trying to use CommonGrams with this patch but
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alex Cowell updated SOLR-2287:
--
Attachment: SOLR-2287.patch
Added a test class which tests basic functionality for 3 collections but sho
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Jason Rutherglen
> wrote:
>>> But: they don't yet support updating the values (the goal is to allow
>>> this, eventually). This is just the first step.
>>
>> No? Hmm... I thought that was a main part
Hi Mike, all --
a (sorrily slow) thanks for this response ;)
From the ensuing discussion, it sounds like there's a LOT to be in v4, and not
raising wrong expectation by giving dates is appreciated ;)
Only thing is, are we talking any time in 2012 or 2011, just to have a
coarse-grained estima
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12982635#action_12982635
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2236:
-
bq. Is that too bad?
well my concern about the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12982623#action_12982623
]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-2236:
-
I like this flexibility - allowing different sc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera resolved LUCENE-2755.
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 1059904 (3x).
Committed revision 1059905 (trunk).
> Some imp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated SOLR-2259:
--
Attachment: SOLR-2259part4.patch
Here is the patch for the last part, part 4.
I added a warnDeprecated(
This sounds like incremental field updates :).
Shai
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Jason Rutherglen
> wrote:
> >> But: they don't yet support updating the values (the goal is to allow
> >> this, eventua
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Robert:
> Thanks, I had a general idea that was the approach, but it's great to
> have someone point the way in detail...
> Erick
>
another thing to consider, it might not be test meddling at all.
it might just be some concurrency bug, and
Robert:
Thanks, I had a general idea that was the approach, but it's great to
have someone point the way in detail...
Erick
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 5:48 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Erick Erickson
> wrote:
> > I'm working on a patch for SOLR-445, and it's near co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved SOLR-2169.
---
Resolution: Not A Problem
Marking not a problem, appears to be fixed with the solr test cleanup.
> Qu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved SOLR-1677.
---
Resolution: Fixed
I think this issue has been resolved for some time.
> Add support for o.a.lucene.u
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12982607#action_12982607
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2738:
-
Mike just reminded me about this one:
My concer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2474?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12982604#action_12982604
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2474:
Ahh, I get it -- invoking the lis
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-2768.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.1
I think this is fixed.
> add infrastr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2666?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12982597#action_12982597
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2666:
OK thanks. Hopefully we can catc
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Jason Rutherglen
wrote:
>> But: they don't yet support updating the values (the goal is to allow
>> this, eventually). This is just the first step.
>
> No? Hmm... I thought that was a main part of the functionality?
Patches welcome ;)
Seriously, how would you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2295?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12982594#action_12982594
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2295:
-
Hi Shai, that sounds like the right solution to
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> I'm working on a patch for SOLR-445, and it's near completion. The problem
> is that I'm getting weird test failures. TestDistributedSearch fails *only*
> when run as part of the full "ant test", *not* when I run it either from the
> comman
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12982564#action_12982564
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-2755:
-
bq. if you still want to work on it, th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-2755:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2755.patch
Patch includes some formatting changes and documentation addition. I'm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2295?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12982529#action_12982529
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2295:
I think the changes to 3x are less complicated th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-849?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12982526#action_12982526
]
Koji Sekiguchi commented on SOLR-849:
-
I didn't realize this ticket. This seems to be add
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2547?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12982519#action_12982519
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2547:
bq. However, in my application, I already have Lo
87 matches
Mail list logo
