On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 00:15, Ken O'Brien wrote:
> To clarify, I've not yet written any code. I aim to bring a large speedup to
> any functionality that is computationally expensive. I'm wondering which
> components are candidates for this.
>
> I'll be looking through the code but if anyone is aw
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/5887/
2 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
org.apache.solr.uima.processor.UIMAUpdateRequestProcessorTest.testProcessing
Error Message:
org.apache.uima.analysis_engine.AnalysisEngineProcessException
Stack Trace:
java.lang.RuntimeEx
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006182#comment-13006182
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2308:
-
Brief Summary for GSoC Students:
Fiel
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006181#comment-13006181
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2621:
-
Brief Summary for GSoC Students:
This
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006180#comment-13006180
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2621:
-
Brief Summary for GSoC Students:
This
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006184#comment-13006184
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2308:
-
bq. I'm surprised to barely even see a
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 12:11 AM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> Simon these are great summaries -- can you post them on the issues too?
> Thanks!
done!
simon
>
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Simon Willnauer
> wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Zhijie Shen wrote:
>>> Hi d
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006185#comment-13006185
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2308:
-
{quote}
Moving stuff from Solr to Lucene invol
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006187#comment-13006187
]
Chris Male commented on LUCENE-2308:
bq. I'm surprised to barely even see a mention t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006188#comment-13006188
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2944:
-
guys, any comments on the api?
I am no good a
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/5874/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.embedded.SolrExampleStreamingTest.testCommitWithin
Error Message:
expected:<0> but was:<1>
Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<0> but w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006192#comment-13006192
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2944:
-
I had a brief review - naming looks go
Hey folks,
I have recently tried to push some refactorings towards moving stuff
from Solr to modules land to enable users of Lucene to benefit from
the developments that have been made in Solr land during the past with
very little success. Actually, it was a really disappointing
experience wheneve
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006211#comment-13006211
]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-2958:
-
bq. So let's keep the current impl as optimize
On Mar 13, 2011, at 10:23 AM, Simon Willnauer wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> I have recently tried to push some refactorings towards moving stuff
> from Solr to modules land to enable users of Lucene to benefit from
> the developments that have been made in Solr land during the past with
> very little
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006213#comment-13006213
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2308:
--
bq. I think there is a lot of overlap but So
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006214#comment-13006214
]
Shay Banon commented on LUCENE-2960:
Just a note regarding the IWC and being able to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006215#comment-13006215
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2308:
-
{quote}
I think there is a lot of over
On Mar 13, 2011, at 8:47 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
> On Mar 13, 2011, at 10:23 AM, Simon Willnauer wrote:
>
>> Hey folks,
>>
>> I have recently tried to push some refactorings towards moving stuff
>> from Solr to modules land to enable users of Lucene to benefit from
>> the developments that
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> I guess the question people w/ Solr only hats on have (if there are such
> people), is which way is that street going? It seems like most people want
> to pull stuff out of Solr, but they don't seem to want to put into it.
> That's pr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006222#comment-13006222
]
Elmar Pitschke commented on LUCENE-2749:
Hi,
i am fairly new to Lucene developmen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006223#comment-13006223
]
Zhijie Shen commented on LUCENE-2621:
-
I've some questions here to make sure I'm look
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006227#comment-13006227
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-2960:
-
{quote}
Why such purity? What do we ga
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006251#comment-13006251
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2958:
A thought -- how about we do the following:
# Li
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006254#comment-13006254
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-2749:
-
Hi Elmar,
I haven't had a chance to do more t
On Mar 13, 2011, at 11:47 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>> I guess the question people w/ Solr only hats on have (if there are such
>> people), is which way is that street going? It seems like most people want
>> to pull stuff out of Solr, b
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-2958:
Attachment: LUCENE-2958.patch
bq. Will that be simpler?
It will be simpler, I admit, but it will h
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006269#comment-13006269
]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-2958:
-
Rethinking this suggestion, I am afraid it wil
It's good to see this discussion finally happen. Some things are in Solr
(e.g. faceting, function queries, Yonik's recent join patch, ...) that
probably belong in Lucene. As someone contributing functionality to
Lucene/Solr in SOLR-2155 (Geospatial search via geohash prefix techniques),
anecdotal
Vectorizable code would be the major target, yes.
Do you know if the guys from Yandex were using CUDA or OpenCL approaches? or
the old kind of opengl hacks.
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Earwin Burrfoot wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 00:15, Ken O'Brien wrote:
> > To clarify, I've not yet
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006284#comment-13006284
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-1725:
This capability is awesome, just as it's DIH equiv
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-2347:
Component/s: contrib - DataImportHandler
Fix Version/s: 4.0
3.2
> Use Input
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006285#comment-13006285
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-2347:
-
This now only affects DIH anymore.
DIH have to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006286#comment-13006286
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-2347:
---
bq. which is no problem as DIH is contrib and experi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006287#comment-13006287
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2960:
-
bq. Maybe its just me, but it feels nicer to h
firstSearcher Listener of SpellChecker can be never called
--
Key: SOLR-2425
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2425
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Components: spe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006313#comment-13006313
]
Koji Sekiguchi commented on SOLR-2425:
--
bq. At the time, firstSearcherListeners includ
"There were experiments with moving both pieces of code to the GPU, and
GPU did well in terms of speed, but they say getting data in and out
of GPU made the approach unfeasible."
That would be the problem with GPUs :) Co-processors always have this
problem. GPUs were designed for 3d video games- t
I see. I will conduct my own experiments with more recent GPU libraries.
Thanks for everyone's input.
On Mar 14, 2011 2:30 AM, "Lance Norskog" wrote:
> "There were experiments with moving both pieces of code to the GPU, and
> GPU did well in terms of speed, but they say getting data in and out
> o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006330#comment-13006330
]
Bill Bell commented on SOLR-2337:
-
The only downfall with this patch, is the hits=10 means
40 matches
Mail list logo
