[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-85?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13009691#comment-13009691
]
Robert Jordan commented on LUCENENET-85:
IIRC, this was done on purpose to
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Solr-3.x/301/
No tests ran.
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 17991 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands,
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/6201/
2 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.lucene.collation.TestCollationKeyAnalyzer.testThreadSafe
Error Message:
Java heap space
Stack Trace:
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
at
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Solr-trunk/1450/
No tests ran.
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 19064 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands,
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 06:21, Chris Hostetter hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
(replying to the dev list, see context below)
: Unfortunately, you can't easily recover from this (except by
: reindexing your docs again).
:
: Failing to call IW.commit() or IW.close() means no segments file was
May I know in which release will it ready to use.
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Simon Willnauer
simon.willna...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Kapil Charania
lonestar.ka...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am a newbie to Lucene. I have already created indexes for my
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2881?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13009599#comment-13009599
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2881:
Patch looks great! Only a few
AFAIK this is still under heavy development and it doesn't seem to be ready in
the near future.
It's stable as far as I'm concerned.
Lucene-2454 includes the code and Junit tests that work with the latest 3.0.3
release. I have versions of this running in production with 2.4 and 2.9-based
Hi,
I know there were good reasons for eliminating the autoCommit
functionality from IndexWriter, but threads like tis make me thing thta
even though autoCommit on flush/merge/whatever was bad, having an
option
for some sort of autoClose using a finalizer might by a good idea to
give
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2881?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13009610#comment-13009610
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2881:
-
bq. We still need a header (id +
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 11:21 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
Anyone see a downside?
I don't think we should do anything serious in a gc finalizer.
sounds like its asking for a JRE crash.
-
To
Hi,
I know there were good reasons for eliminating the autoCommit
functionality from IndexWriter, but threads like tis make me thing thta
even
though autoCommit on flush/merge/whatever was bad, having an option
for some sort of autoClose using a finalizer might by a good idea to
give
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley resolved LUCENE-2894.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Use of google-code-prettify for Lucene/Solr Javadoc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13009627#comment-13009627
]
Toke Eskildsen commented on SOLR-2396:
--
A rough idea: It seems that ICU Collator Keys
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-85?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13009628#comment-13009628
]
Sergey Mirvoda commented on LUCENENET-85:
-
Why invariant culture?
You should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13009630#comment-13009630
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-2396:
---
bq. A rough idea: It seems that ICU Collator Keys
I like Uwe's idea. As for Hoss's original suggestion, my initial
reaction is that if a user understands the need to set the option
in the first place, they're also more likely to understand the need
for close().
FWIW
Erick
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-85?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13009637#comment-13009637
]
Sergej Koščejev commented on LUCENENET-85:
--
As far as I can tell, the methods
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/6228/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterMergePolicy.testMaxBufferedDocsChange
Error Message:
null
Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError:
at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-85?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13009650#comment-13009650
]
Sergey Mirvoda commented on LUCENENET-85:
-
Not sure relevant this rule to lucene
Please vote to release the artifacts at
http://people.apache.org/~yonik/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.1RC2
as Lucene 3.1 and Solr 3.1
Thanks for everyone's help pulling all this together!
-Yonik
http://www.lucenerevolution.org -- Lucene/Solr User Conference, May
25-26, San Francisco
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13009665#comment-13009665
]
Toke Eskildsen commented on SOLR-2396:
--
The JavaDoc for CollationKey is very explicit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13009670#comment-13009670
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-2396:
---
Well, its something we could be consider?, but on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2978?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Doron Cohen resolved LUCENE-2978.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Lucene Fields: (was: [New])
Committed:
- r1084210 - trunk
- r1084231
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2881?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13009718#comment-13009718
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2881:
-
Committed to trunk - I will keep this
- assertEquals(Wrong numbre of documents created by osurce!,5,n);
+ assertEquals(Wrong number of documents created by osurce!,5,n);
Err... Was this meant to be 'source' in the new version?
D.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13009726#comment-13009726
]
Scott Lombard commented on LUCENENET-380:
-
I was investigating what license
:)
Thanks, will fix.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Dawid Weiss dawid.we...@gmail.com wrote:
-assertEquals(Wrong numbre of documents created by osurce!,5,n);
+assertEquals(Wrong number of documents created by osurce!,5,n);
Err... Was this meant to be 'source' in the new version?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13009741#comment-13009741
]
Alex Thompson commented on LUCENENET-380:
-
The dOCL is just an option in
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-trunk/1505/
No tests ran.
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 8651 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands,
Benchmark's ContentSource should not rely on file suffixes to be lower cased
when detecting file type (gzip/bzip2/text)
---
Key: LUCENE-2980
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2980?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-2980:
Attachment: LUCENE-2980.patch
Patch with test that fail due to this bug.
Benchmark's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steven Rowe reopened LUCENE-2973:
-
Ant's {{exec}} task can take arguments in two forms: as a line to be
parsed/split by the shell
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2980?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13009796#comment-13009796
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2980:
Patch looks good. Few tiny comments:
* Should
Heh -- I think INFRA fixed the subject line thing. Both emails were grouped
together by Gmail. Notice that [Created] and [Updated] in both of them.
Nice !
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Doron Cohen (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote:
[
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13009798#comment-13009798
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-2973:
-
bq. The {{svn-export-source}} target should be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steven Rowe updated LUCENE-2973:
Priority: Minor (was: Blocker)
Source distribution packaging targets should make a tarball from
Heads up -- LUCENE-2881, which I committed earlier today, changes the
SegmentInfos file format and adds a new ${number}.fnx file storing
global field numbers.
If you have any indexes lying around built with revs of trunk before
this commit, after you update you should completely reindex.
Indexes
Thanks, we should add this rev also to the 3.1.1 issue still open. Maybe we get
another rc, we can merge then earlier.
--
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, 28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
sar...@apache.org schrieb:
Author: sarowe Date: Tue Mar 22 19:50:05 2011 New Revision: 1084324 URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steven Rowe updated LUCENE-2973:
Fix Version/s: 3.1.1
Source distribution packaging targets should make a tarball from svn export
I agree – I’ve added it. - Steve
From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de]
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 3:54 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r1084324 - in /lucene/dev/branches/branch_3x:
lucene/build.xml solr/build.xml solr/common-build.xml
Thanks, we should add this
Review and potentially remove unused/unsupported Contribs
-
Key: LUCENE-2981
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2981
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13009812#comment-13009812
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-2973:
-
The {{svn-export-source}} targets were not
I found a few documentation issues in the binary Lucene .zip (these are not
blockers, IMHO):
Lucene binary .zip
--
A. README.txt:
1. contrib/demo/lucene-demos-XX.jar
(demos should be demo)
2. See BUILD.txt for building a source distribution
(there is no such
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2428?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13009824#comment-13009824
]
Dawid Weiss commented on SOLR-2428:
---
Also, update the license's (c) years.
Upgrade
Don't know how important this is, but:
1) I've just tried following the instructions from example/README.txt,
under cygwin curl is not installed by default and post.sh assumes it
is always available, resulting command-not-found ugliness.
2) example/solr/conf/solrconfig.xml states that:\
!--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2980?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13009869#comment-13009869
]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-2980:
-
Thanks Shai!
I fixed the super class and the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2980?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-2980:
Attachment: LUCENE-2980.patch
Attached patch adds fixes for:
- extension letter case problem.
-
Get rid of ContenSource's workaround for closing b/gzip input stream once this
is fixed in CommonCompress
-
Key: LUCENE-2982
URL:
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-3.x/322/
All tests passed
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 18984 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands,
: I like Uwe's idea. As for Hoss's original suggestion, my initial
: reaction is that if a user understands the need to set the option
: in the first place, they're also more likely to understand the need
: for close().
my intention was that if the user used a novice type API for getting an
: I think finalize() is that not trustworthy, in that it may
: never be called, e.g. in case GC happened to not collect the specific
: object,
: and so the way for programmers to guarantee execution of any code
: at shutdown is with shutdown hooks, I guess this is that what you meant,
i'm not
Overall, things look good to me.
As discussed on IRC, one minor nit:
1. In the source bundle, the Changes.html is missing and so index.html has dead
links. I know Changes.html is generated. We could just hook this into the svn
export target and then I think the docs would be whole.
I guess
May I know in which release will it be ready to use.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Kapil Charania kapil.chara...@gmail.comwrote:
May I know in which release will it ready to use.
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Simon Willnauer
simon.willna...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-trunk/1507/
No tests ran.
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 77 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13009972#comment-13009972
]
Phillipe Ramalho commented on LUCENE-2979:
--
Hi,
I am considering doing a gsoc
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/6232/
No tests ran.
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 47 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13008825#comment-13008825
]
Bill Bell edited comment on SOLR-2242 at 3/23/11 2:31 AM:
--
Can
I'm messing with putting binary data directly in the index. I have a
field class with:
@Override
public TokenStream tokenStreamValue() {
byte[] value = (byte[])fieldsData;
Token token = new Token( 0, value.length, geo );
token.resizeBuffer( value.length );
BytesRef ref =
+1
* Walked through the solr example
* Tested a simple maven project, worked well
I don't think the minor issues listed so far are blockers
Thanks to everyone who worked on this!
ryan
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
Please vote to release the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2454?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13009985#comment-13009985
]
Ryan McKinley commented on LUCENE-2454:
---
bq. Solr, however does introduce a schema
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2980?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13009986#comment-13009986
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2980:
That's a serious problem - good catch !
Patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris Male updated LUCENE-2310:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2310.patch
Reactivating this issue.
New patch against 3x (since its all about
Hi,
I don't know
enough about finer points of shutdown hooks to comment on the distinctio,
but my off the cuff assumption is that a shutdown hook would be a bad idea
... in a long running program wouldn't thta keep the IndexWriter
from being GCed until shutdown?
Could be, haven't use them
On Mar 22, 2011 11:38 PM, Ryan McKinley ryan...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm messing with putting binary data directly in the index. I have a
field class with:
@Override
public TokenStream tokenStreamValue() {
byte[] value = (byte[])fieldsData;
Token token = new Token( 0, value.length,
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Solr-3.x/302/
No tests ran.
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 17993 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands,
66 matches
Mail list logo
