[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-3261:
---
Attachment: facet-userguide.pdf
Attaching the userguide from LUCENE-3079.
> Faceting module usergui
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057635#comment-13057635
]
Chris Male commented on LUCENE-3241:
I will re-evaluate the tests and port what I can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057599#comment-13057599
]
Shai Erera edited comment on LUCENE-3079 at 6/30/11 5:55 AM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2625?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated SOLR-2625:
--
Affects Version/s: 3.3
> NPE in Term Vector Components
> -
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2625?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer resolved SOLR-2625.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.4
> NPE in Term Vector Components
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057624#comment-13057624
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3241:
-
+1 to nuke and remove the duplication, and add
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2625?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated SOLR-2625:
--
Attachment: SOLR-2625.patch
final patch. I added a randomized test to trunk, merged it to 3.x an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris Male reassigned LUCENE-3241:
--
Assignee: Chris Male
> Remove Lucene core's FunctionQuery impls
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057620#comment-13057620
]
Chris Male commented on LUCENE-3241:
Command for patch:
{code}
svn move
lucene/src/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris Male updated LUCENE-3241:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-3241.patch
Patch that deprecates the contents of org.apache.lucene.search.functio
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-3264:
Attachment: LUCENE-3264.patch
> crank up faceting module tests
> --
>
crank up faceting module tests
--
Key: LUCENE-3264
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3264
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Test
Components: modules/facet
Reporter: Robert Mu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris Male updated LUCENE-3242:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-3242.patch
Patch which converts common-build.xml (lucene's) project name to commo
Create Build-A-Module process
-
Key: LUCENE-3263
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3263
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: general/build
Reporter: Chri
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2878?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mike Sokolov updated LUCENE-2878:
-
Attachment: PosHighlighter.patch
Attaching a patch with a simple highlighter using the position
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057599#comment-13057599
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-3079:
I opened LUCENE-3261 and LUCENE-3260 to track us
Facet benchmarking
--
Key: LUCENE-3262
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3262
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: modules/benchmark, modules/facet
Reporter: Shai Er
Faceting module userguide
-
Key: LUCENE-3261
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3261
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: modules/facet
Reporter: Shai Erera
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057596#comment-13057596
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-3260:
Patch looks good Mike.
One minor comment, atLea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057595#comment-13057595
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3259:
-
{quote}
If D&PEnum says getPayload() returns n
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057593#comment-13057593
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-3259:
If D&PEnum says getPayload() returns null if the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera resolved LUCENE-3258.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.3
Already fixed in 3.3
> File leak when IOException occ
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera reopened LUCENE-3258:
Reopening to change resolution
> File leak when IOException occurs during index optimization.
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris Male resolved LUCENE-3256.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Chris Male
Committed revision 1141366.
> Consolidate CustomScor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057565#comment-13057565
]
Chris Male commented on LUCENE-3256:
Command for patch is:
{code}
svn move
lucene/s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris Male updated LUCENE-3256:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-3256.patch
New patch which incorporates Yonik's thoughts. BoostedQuery is now a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2454?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057538#comment-13057538
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2454:
bq. Do you think there any effic
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-3171.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.3)
3.4
> Bl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2454?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-2454.
Resolution: Duplicate
Duplicate of LUCENE-3171.
> Nested Document query support
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-3260:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-3260.patch
Patch, w/ new test showing the issue in MTE when you n
I pretty much agree with Rory.
And as others have said, this issue has been discussed many times. What is
most important about the fact that it has been discussed many times is that
it has not been resolve, even though it has been discussed so many times.
That means that the both the developer co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-3260:
--
Assignee: Michael McCandless
> need a test that uses termsenum.seekExact() (wh
Andi Vajda wrote:
>
> On Jun 29, 2011, at 22:06, Bill Janssen wrote:
>
> > Andi Vajda wrote:
> >
> >> Put everything into a class and call all the python stuff from there.
> >
> > I'd like to make the method on the Java class be static, so I'd like
> > that method to create an instance and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057515#comment-13057515
]
Chris Male edited comment on LUCENE-3256 at 6/29/11 10:15 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057515#comment-13057515
]
Chris Male commented on LUCENE-3256:
{quote}
I'm not sure if we should change the imp
> I do not know if too much emphasis should be placed on "user" vs.
"contributor".
I am sorry for this misunderstanding.
What I tried to say with "contributor"(not "committer") was the "people that
works on Lucene.Net source code", not the ones who just consume it.
DIGY
-Original Message---
I do not know if too much emphasis should be placed on "user" vs.
"contributor". The project needs to also consider those of us who use
Lucene.NET source releases only.
It is much easier to locally patch/fix the source when I can compare it
directly to Lucene core.
- Neal
-Original Mess
Others have done a much better , more through job of explaining the issues in
previous discussions. It would be best to re-read those.
One way to understand it, is if Lucene.NET cannot be compared to the reference
source code (Lucene core "java Lucene") than it becomes nearly impossible to
val
need a test that uses termsenum.seekExact() (which returns true), then calls
next()
---
Key: LUCENE-3260
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3260
Project: L
need to clarify/change D&Penum api for hasPayload/getPayload
Key: LUCENE-3259
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3259
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057486#comment-13057486
]
Simon Willnauer commented on SOLR-2462:
---
bq. We just ran into this bug when we upgrad
It looks like the vote has passed... I'll work on getting these artifacts out.
Thanks everyone for voting.
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Yonik Seeley
wrote:
> +1
>
> -Yonik
> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
>> Artifacts here:
>>
>> ht
I do not know if too much emphasis should be placed on "user" vs.
"contributor". The project needs to also consider those of us who use
Lucene.NET source releases only.
It is much easier to locally patch/fix the source when I can compare it
directly to Lucene core.
- Neal
-Original Mess
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057483#comment-13057483
]
Mitsu Hadeishi commented on SOLR-2462:
--
We just ran into this bug when we upgraded to
Hi Scott,
Please avoid crossposting(as I do now). Since when I reply to your eMail, it
goes to one of the lists and thread is splitted into two.
It may be good for announcements but not for discussions.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Scott Lombard [mailto:lombardena...@gmail.com]
Sent: We
When I look at the goals of Lucene.Net I am trying to understand what is
more important to Lucene.Net users, .NET functionality or a line-for-line
port.
.NET and Java are close but not the same. In the past when give the choice
between a better .NET way or stay with the Java implementation the pr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2625?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated SOLR-2625:
--
Attachment: SOLR-2625.patch
phew, this is not the nicest part of the lucene / solr codebase. Her
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2625?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer reassigned SOLR-2625:
-
Assignee: Simon Willnauer
> NPE in Term Vector Components
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057468#comment-13057468
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3079:
-
Committed revision 1141246.
I think we should
DONE. Now let's update build.xmls!
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Simon Willnauer [mailto:simon.willna...@googlemail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 10:37 PM
> To: dev@lucene.a
On Jun 29, 2011, at 22:17, Christian Heimes wrote:
> Am 29.06.2011 18:13, schrieb Andi Vajda:
>> Sigh. The setuptools story is getting worse. I wonder how the 'distribute'
>> project is doing... It's the solution I used for the Python 3.1 jcc port I
>> did last summer. In particular, I wonder
On Jun 29, 2011, at 22:06, Bill Janssen wrote:
> Andi Vajda wrote:
>
>> Put everything into a class and call all the python stuff from there.
>
> I'd like to make the method on the Java class be static, so I'd like
> that method to create an instance and call a protected or
> package-private
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-3079:
Attachment: LUCENE-3079.patch
updated patch: all tests pass.
I changed the nocommits to TODO (Fac
I think this vote has passed. Let's move to 1.6!
Uwe can you update Jenkins?
Simon
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:30 PM, DM Smith wrote:
> +1 from old-stick-in-the-mud, whose vote does not count :)
>
> BTW, today Apple released Java 1.5.0_30. So while Oracle has not supplied
> security updates or bu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-428?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy closed LUCENENET-428.
--
Resolution: Invalid
Please post questions to the mailing list, not in JIRA
> How to do that the results are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057448#comment-13057448
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3258:
---
I don't think "won't" fix is the correct "
Am 29.06.2011 18:13, schrieb Andi Vajda:
> Sigh. The setuptools story is getting worse. I wonder how the 'distribute'
> project is doing... It's the solution I used for the Python 3.1 jcc port I
> did last summer. In particular, I wonder if they integrated my patch, for
> that issue 43 I filed l
For the sake of continued conversation, Scott could you define what you mean
by line-by-line port vs non-line-by-line port since technically your the
thread starter?
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Digy wrote:
> As a Lucene.Net user I wouldn't care whether it is line-by-line port or
> not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057445#comment-13057445
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-3079:
Thanks guys for doing this port so quickly. The
Andi Vajda wrote:
> Put everything into a class and call all the python stuff from there.
I'd like to make the method on the Java class be static, so I'd like
that method to create an instance and call a protected or
package-private method that is implemented by the Python class. But
JCC doesn
As a Lucene.Net user I wouldn't care whether it is line-by-line port or not.
But as a contributer, I would prefer a parallel code that makes the life
easier for manual ports of new releases(until this process is automated)
PS: I presume no one thinks of functional or index-level incompatibility.
Those are pretty strong words -- I'd really like to know why I
shouldn't trust anything but a line-by-line port. Can you explain a
bit?
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Granroth, Neal V.
wrote:
> This is has been discussed many times.
> Lucene.NET is not valid, the code cannot be trusted, if it i
This is has been discussed many times.
Lucene.NET is not valid, the code cannot be trusted, if it is not a
line-by-line port. It ceases to be Lucene.
- Neal
-Original Message-
From: Scott Lombard [mailto:lombardena...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 1:58 PM
To: lucene-net-...
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057428#comment-13057428
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3079:
bq. the previous fail is somehow
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057425#comment-13057425
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-2565:
---
Okay - looks like this applies and tests pass.
> Pr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057407#comment-13057407
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3258:
-
just to followup, the changes here didn't make
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3025?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-3025.
-
Resolution: Duplicate
fixed in LUCENE-3147
> TestIndexWriterExceptions fails on windows (2)
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-2991.
-
Resolution: Duplicate
fixed in LUCENE-3147
> TestIndexWriterExceptions fails on windows
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera resolved LUCENE-3258.
Resolution: Won't Fix
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.0.3)
These issues were fixed in LUCENE-314
Thank you for the details.
Andi..
On Jun 29, 2011, at 19:37, Bill Janssen wrote:
> Bill Janssen wrote:
>
>> Andi Vajda wrote:
>>
>>> Sigh. The setuptools story is getting worse.
>>
>>> I wonder how the
>>> 'distribute' project is doing... It's the solution I used for the
>>> Python 3.1 jc
Put everything into a class and call all the python stuff from there.
Andi..
On Jun 29, 2011, at 18:18, Bill Janssen wrote:
> I'm building a Java wrapper for the Python regex module, and I'd like to
> be able to call the module function "escape" from Java. It takes a
> string and returns a st
File leak when IOException occurs during index optimization.
Key: LUCENE-3258
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3258
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
After the large community response about moving the code base from .Net 2.0
to Net 4.0 I am trying to figure out what is the need for a line-by-line
port. Starting with Digy's excellent work on the conversion to generics a
priority of the 2.9.4g release is the 2 packages would not be
interchang
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057399#comment-13057399
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3079:
-
the previous fail is somehow a bug in memoryco
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-3079:
Attachment: LUCENE-3079_4x.patch
updated patch, one of the fails was caused by my use of seekExact
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : Failure to fetch junit's package list yet again... but Hoss is working
> : on this I think!
>
> I posted a straw-man patch, but i haven't relaly had time to seriously
> test it on modules/contrib ... and i thik rmuir had some reservatio
: Failure to fetch junit's package list yet again... but Hoss is working
: on this I think!
I posted a straw-man patch, but i haven't relaly had time to seriously
test it on modules/contrib ... and i thik rmuir had some reservations
about putting the stuff in dev-tools ... but if someone is itc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-3079:
Attachment: LUCENE-3079_4x_broken.patch
here's a hack patch, tried to quickly move this thing to t
I'm building a Java wrapper for the Python regex module, and I'd like to
be able to call the module function "escape" from Java. It takes a
string and returns a string. But I don't see how I can do that given
the current PythonVM? Some trick with module instantiation, perhaps?
Or does the API ne
Andi Vajda wrote:
> On Jun 29, 2011, at 16:43, Bill Janssen wrote:
>
> > Andi Vajda wrote:
> >
> >>> By the way, you might want to add a paragraph in that section about
> >>> adding the ["-framework", "Python"] flags for building JCC on OS X. I
> >>> tripped over that again.
> >>
> >> If yo
On Jun 29, 2011, at 18:04, Bill Janssen wrote:
> I hit another gotcha building shared on Ubuntu. I thought I had
> setuptools installed. When I built JCC, I got no error message about
> patch 43, and the config.py said "shared". But the library that got
> built was "libjcc.a", not "libjcc.so"
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057318#comment-13057318
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-2565:
---
If this patch applies, I'll commit it.
> Prevent IW
I hit another gotcha building shared on Ubuntu. I thought I had
setuptools installed. When I built JCC, I got no error message about
patch 43, and the config.py said "shared". But the library that got
built was "libjcc.a", not "libjcc.so".
Turns out that the Ubuntu package "python-setuptools" i
On Jun 29, 2011, at 16:43, Bill Janssen wrote:
> Andi Vajda wrote:
>
>>> By the way, you might want to add a paragraph in that section about
>>> adding the ["-framework", "Python"] flags for building JCC on OS X. I
>>> tripped over that again.
>>
>> If you send a paragraph to this effect, I'
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2878?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057306#comment-13057306
]
Mike Sokolov edited comment on LUCENE-2878 at 6/29/11 3:49 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2878?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057306#comment-13057306
]
Mike Sokolov commented on LUCENE-2878:
--
bq. there should be only one consumer really
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-3216:
Attachment: LUCENE-3216.patch
I committed the latest patch, this patch is a first sketch u
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Maven-trunk/165/
No tests ran.
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 7065 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057285#comment-13057285
]
Martijn Laarman commented on SOLR-2553:
---
I created Lucene issue: https://issues.apach
Nested Field Collapsing
---
Key: LUCENE-3257
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3257
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: modules/grouping
Reporter: Martijn Laarm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057232#comment-13057232
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-3256:
--
I'm not sure if we should change the impleme
Build:
https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-flexscoring-branch/60/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.cloud.CloudStateUpdateTest.testCoreRegistration
Error Message:
expected:<2> but was:<3>
Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<2> but was:<3>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-3079:
---
Attachment: facet-userguide.pdf
Committed revision 1141060 (3x). Will start the port to trunk.
I'm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057186#comment-13057186
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3255:
Actually, we can do something ev
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-3216:
Attachment: LUCENE-3216.patch
this patch converts all docvalue types to index into memory.
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Maven-3.x/166/
No tests ran.
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 7581 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057169#comment-13057169
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-2623:
-
Thanks for reporting this Alexey
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057148#comment-13057148
]
Toke Eskildsen edited comment on LUCENE-3079 at 6/29/11 11:02 AM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057148#comment-13057148
]
Toke Eskildsen commented on LUCENE-3079:
I re-ran the edge case 5M documents, 6.8
Failure to fetch junit's package list yet again... but Hoss is working
on this I think!
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 1:54 AM, Apache Jenkins Server
wrote:
> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Solr-3.x/394/
>
> No tests ran.
>
> Build Log (for compile
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
