[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293983#comment-13293983
]
Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENENET-438:
--
This should be made by a
Hey,
I'm trying to build JCC on Python 2.4.3 (CentOS 5). However during the
compilation I get this error:
gcc -pthread -fno-strict-aliasing -DNDEBUG -O2 -g -pipe -Wall
-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector
--param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -D_GNU_SOURCE -fPIC -fPIC
Hi Felix,
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Felix Schwarz wrote:
I'm trying to build JCC on Python 2.4.3 (CentOS 5). However during the
compilation I get this error:
gcc -pthread -fno-strict-aliasing -DNDEBUG -O2 -g -pipe -Wall
-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-4136:
Attachment: LUCENE-4136.patch
I reduced the # of checkpoints this test runs to keep that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293427#comment-13293427
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-4061:
-
bq. Not sure it's worth it. What do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3854?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293446#comment-13293446
]
András Péteri commented on LUCENE-3854:
---
Isn't this considered a regression from
Build:
http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java7-64/298/
1 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.solr.handler.TestReplicationHandler.test
Error Message:
expected:498 but was:0
Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError: expected:498 but was:0
at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293461#comment-13293461
]
Sebastian Lutze commented on LUCENE-4133:
-
Hi Koji,
bq. I changed 0.26632088 to
Dawid Weiss created LUCENE-4138:
---
Summary: Update morfologik (polish stemming) to 1.5.3
Key: LUCENE-4138
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4138
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293463#comment-13293463
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-4061:
Thanks Simon for reviewing the patch. I'll
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-4061:
---
Fix Version/s: 5.0
Improvements to DirectoryTaxonomyWriter (synchronization and others)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera resolved LUCENE-4061.
Resolution: Fixed
Committed rev 1349214 (trunk) and 1349223 (4x).
Improvements
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Solr-4.x/7/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.cloud.RecoveryZkTest.testDistribSearch
Error Message:
Thread threw an uncaught exception, thread: Thread[Lucene Merge Thread #1,6,]
Stack Trace:
java.lang.RuntimeException: Thread threw an uncaught
Build:
http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-4.x-Windows-Java7-64/47/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.handler.TestReplicationHandler.test
Error Message:
expected:498 but was:0
Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError: expected:498 but was:0
at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293504#comment-13293504
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-2357:
--
Committed (r1349234 on trunk and r1349241 on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrien Grand resolved LUCENE-2357.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Adrien Grand (was: Michael McCandless)
Reduce
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293506#comment-13293506
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4136:
-
+1 to commit (and remove @nightly): with the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293513#comment-13293513
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-4120:
--
@Robert: Yes, it only affects packed FSTs.
Robert Muir created LUCENE-4139:
---
Summary: mixing up indexOptions in same IW session makes corrumpt
index
Key: LUCENE-4139
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4139
Project: Lucene - Java
selckin created LUCENE-4140:
---
Summary: IndexWriterConfig has setFlushPolicy but the class is
package private
Key: LUCENE-4140
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4140
Project: Lucene - Java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293526#comment-13293526
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-2899:
-
Very cool Lance. The models are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll reassigned LUCENE-2899:
---
Assignee: Grant Ingersoll
Add OpenNLP Analysis capabilities as a module
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-4139:
Attachment: LUCENE-4139_test.patch
simple test.
mixing up indexOptions in same
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293529#comment-13293529
]
Tommaso Teofili commented on LUCENE-2899:
-
bq. I wonder how hard it would be to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-4139:
Attachment: LUCENE-4139_test.patch
updated test: actually the bug has nothing to do with mixing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-4139:
Summary: multivalued field with offsets makes corrumpt index (was: mixing
up indexOptions in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293553#comment-13293553
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4139:
-
I dont know whats going on with offsets for
Build:
http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java7-64/299/
2 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.cloud.OverseerTest.testShardLeaderChange
Error Message:
Unexpected shard leader coll:collection1 shard:shard1 expected:core[4] but
was:core[1]
Stack Trace:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293554#comment-13293554
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4139:
-
Looks like we arent summing up offsets
Robert Muir created LUCENE-4141:
---
Summary: don't allow Analyzer.offsetGap/posIncGap to be negative
Key: LUCENE-4141
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4141
Project: Lucene - Java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293560#comment-13293560
]
Joern Kottmann commented on LUCENE-2899:
I am using this mentioned Corpus Server
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293562#comment-13293562
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-2899:
-
Cool!
I think if we could just get
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293561#comment-13293561
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-4139:
---
The problem is more complicated:
How would
Build:
http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java6-64/513/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.handler.TestReplicationHandler.test
Error Message:
expected:498 but was:0
Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError: expected:498 but was:0
at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-4139:
Attachment: LUCENE-4139.patch
patch... needs review and maybe suggestions on how to make it more
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293575#comment-13293575
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4139:
-
{quote}
The problem is more complicated:
How
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293582#comment-13293582
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-2899:
-
This really should just be a part of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293589#comment-13293589
]
Joern Kottmann commented on LUCENE-2899:
For a test you can run OpenNLP just over
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Smiley updated SOLR-3534:
---
Attachment:
SOLR-3534_dismax_and_edismax_should_default_to_df_if_qf_is_absent.patch
Attached is a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Sekiguchi resolved LUCENE-4133.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 5.0
Committed in trunk and 4x.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293647#comment-13293647
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-3534:
Bernd:
In my patch I did throw an exception if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293651#comment-13293651
]
Jack Krupansky commented on SOLR-3534:
--
Looks like a reasonable compromise. I would
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293653#comment-13293653
]
Koji Sekiguchi commented on LUCENE-3440:
Hi Sebastian,
I've committed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Sekiguchi resolved LUCENE-3440.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 5.0
Assignee: Koji Sekiguchi
Thanks,
Build:
http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java7-64/300/
1 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.OverseerTest.testShardLeaderChange
Error Message:
Unexpected shard leader coll:collection1 shard:shard1 expected:core[4] but
was:core[1]
Stack Trace:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293669#comment-13293669
]
Sebastian Lutze commented on LUCENE-3440:
-
Hi Koji,
bq. I'm going to close and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-4139:
Attachment: LUCENE-4139.patch
updated patch, i renamed the prevOffset in writeOffset to
While working on the collections api, I have seen this on the odd occasion
locally as well.
On Jun 12, 2012, at 10:43 AM, jenk...@sd-datasolutions.de wrote:
Build:
http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java7-64/300/
1 tests failed.
FAILED:
Hello,
I would like to write my own pdf text/metadata extraction
module using iText instead of tika/pdfbox.
Where to start? Any hints?
Regards,
Roland
I am working on it, I have identified at least one problem which is
that the overseer is killed too often in that test, i'll let the test
run locally for a bit and if everything looks good commit a fix
tomorrow.
--
Sami Siren
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293722#comment-13293722
]
John Berryman edited comment on LUCENE-2605 at 6/12/12 4:09 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-4132:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-4132.patch
Phew, that was tricky, but here's the end result -- refactored
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293725#comment-13293725
]
Shai Erera edited comment on LUCENE-4132 at 6/12/12 4:13 PM:
-
Start by looking at the Tika code that integrates PDFBox since that is exactly
where you want to end up – if you want to integrate your code with Tika and
SolrCell.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tika/trunk/tika-parsers/src/main/java/org/apache/tika/parser/pdf/
If you are going to replace
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293748#comment-13293748
]
Jack Krupansky commented on LUCENE-2605:
My thought on the original issue is that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-4139:
Attachment: LUCENE-4139.patch
stupid IDE. forgot to press save. This one actually has the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293761#comment-13293761
]
Simon Rosenthal commented on SOLR-3535:
---
Mikhail:
not clear to me from the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293760#comment-13293760
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-4139:
Patch looks good! Nice find.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293780#comment-13293780
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-4120:
Patch looks great!
bq. I can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293783#comment-13293783
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4132:
-
I think the class hierarchy/generics are too
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293784#comment-13293784
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-4132:
---
That's certified and suggested by the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293788#comment-13293788
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4132:
-
Its not certified by me. Its too confusing for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293791#comment-13293791
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-4132:
If we remove IWC's chained
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293792#comment-13293792
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-4132:
---
We could, I am against, I love
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-4139.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 5.0
4.0
multivalued field with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293812#comment-13293812
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-4120:
-
bq. I think that's fine; you can't change an
Hi Shai.
I think this question may be of relevance to others, so I allowed
myself to CC the list. So:
I see these printed when I run test-core:
[junit4] IGNOR/A 0.00s | Test10KPulsings.test10kNotPulsed
[junit4] Assumption #1: 'nightly' test group is disabled (@Nightly)
Is IGNOR a
Hi Corwin,
This not yet possible out of the box. However I think it is possible:
1) Create a Lucene collector that counts for all groups the number of
document that match. This collector will basically compute a map with
the group value as key and a count as value
2) Run this collector as an
Thanks Dawid,
I guess if it just spelled IGNORED/A, I wouldn't think it's a typo. If it's
possible, can we have it spelled correctly? It's not critical if it's too
much work.
Shai
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Dawid Weiss
dawid.we...@cs.put.poznan.plwrote:
Hi Shai.
I think this question
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293844#comment-13293844
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-4132:
I love it too, and the changes would be too
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293858#comment-13293858
]
Mikhail Khludnev commented on SOLR-3535:
@Simon,
the intention of this patch is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293858#comment-13293858
]
Mikhail Khludnev edited comment on SOLR-3535 at 6/12/12 7:15 PM:
That's a good idea, thanks for the tip Martijn. I'm not a fan of performing
an extra search, but it does seem like it's unavoidable for this scenario.
We are currently working with Lucene 3.5 and you mentioned that it assumes
Lucene 4 or 3.6. Any particular reason for that? I prefer not upgrading
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293867#comment-13293867
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-3535:
It seems like what we really want to express here
Andre' Hazelwood created SOLR-3538:
--
Summary: Unloading a SolrCore object and specifying delete does
not fully delete all Solr parts
Key: SOLR-3538
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3538
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293868#comment-13293868
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-4132:
The generics is because I wanted to not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrien Grand updated LUCENE-4120:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-4120.patch
bq. Can you move the imports under the copyright header in
I guess if it just spelled IGNORED/A, I wouldn't think it's a typo. If it's
possible, can we have it spelled correctly? It's not critical if it's too
Hmm... It makes that column two characters wider! :)
D.
-
To unsubscribe,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293885#comment-13293885
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-4132:
-
I think the generics here are not very
Hoss Man created SOLR-3539:
--
Summary: rethink softCommit=true|false param on commits?
Key: SOLR-3539
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3539
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293886#comment-13293886
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-3539:
This is something that started to concern me while trying
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer reassigned LUCENE-4136:
---
Assignee: Simon Willnauer
TestDocumentsWriterStallControl hang (reproducible)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer resolved LUCENE-4136.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 5.0
4.0
Lucene Fields:
I assumed using the queries module, which isn't in 3.x. After a look
at the 3.x codebase this doesn't seem to be a problem.
Since all the classes you need are in: o.a.l.search.function package
inside core Lucene. You can use
the CustomScoreQuery ValueSourceQuery instead of the BoostedQuery.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4085?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293905#comment-13293905
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4085:
-
I improved the situation to some extent in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293924#comment-13293924
]
Erik Hatcher commented on SOLR-3535:
bq. It seems like what we really want to express
Great! I will do that.
Thanks a lot.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Grouping-Boosting-large-groups-tp3988959p3989298.html
Sent from the Lucene - Java Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Build:
http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java6-64/516/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.handler.TestReplicationHandler.test
Error Message:
expected:498 but was:0
Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError: expected:498 but was:0
at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293940#comment-13293940
]
John Berryman commented on LUCENE-2605:
---
(How's it going Jack) Interesting idea,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2600?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated SOLR-2600:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1)
4.0
Assignee: Hoss Man
we've already seen questions
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293988#comment-13293988
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4120:
-
{quote}
Yes, it only affects packed FSTs. In
Build:
http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-4.x-Windows-Java7-64/51/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.handler.TestReplicationHandler.test
Error Message:
expected:498 but was:0
Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError: expected:498 but was:0
at
Robert Muir created LUCENE-4142:
---
Summary: AnalyzerWrapper doesn't work with CharFilters.
Key: LUCENE-4142
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4142
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-4142:
Attachment: LUCENE-4142.patch
AnalyzerWrapper doesn't work with CharFilters.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-4141:
Attachment: LUCENE-4141_test.patch
here's some initial tests: overflow checks work, but negative
I just checked in a fix (hopefully) for this.
The snap puller was creating a temp directory that only used down to
seconds precision. I've changed it to milliseconds.
-Yonik
http://lucidimagination.com
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 5:40 PM, jenk...@sd-datasolutions.de wrote:
Build:
Build:
http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-4.x-Windows-Java7-64/52/
1 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.solr.common.util.ContentStreamTest.testURLStream
Error Message:
Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError
at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13294082#comment-13294082
]
Chris Male commented on LUCENE-4142:
+1
AnalyzerWrapper doesn't
Build:
http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux-Java6-64/880/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
org.apache.lucene.analysis.TestGraphTokenizers.testDoubleMockGraphTokenFilterRandom
Error Message:
startOffset=3562 lastEndOffset=3574
Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError:
Robert Muir created LUCENE-4143:
---
Summary: add backwards checkindex crosscheck
Key: LUCENE-4143
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4143
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
