[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13293651#comment-13293651
]
Jack Krupansky commented on SOLR-3534:
--------------------------------------
Looks like a reasonable compromise. I would edit the exception so that it reads
like you just said: "neither 'qf', 'df' nor the default search field are
present" or at least add "Neither" in front of what you currently have.
Any idea what happens for the classic/Solr or flex query parsers if default
search field is not present?
> dismax and edismax should default to "df" when "qf" is absent.
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-3534
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3534
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: query parsers
> Affects Versions: 4.0
> Reporter: David Smiley
> Assignee: David Smiley
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments:
> SOLR-3534_dismax_and_edismax_should_default_to_df_if_qf_is_absent.patch
>
>
> The dismax and edismax query parsers should default to "df" when the "qf"
> parameter is absent. They only use the defaultSearchField in schema.xml as a
> fallback now.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
