[jira] [Assigned] (SOLR-3377) eDismax: A fielded query wrapped by parens is not recognized

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bernd Fehling reassigned SOLR-3377: --- Assignee: Jan Høydahl (was: Bernd Fehling) > eDismax: A fielded query wrapped by parens i

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-4161) Make PackedInts usable by codecs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4161?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adrien Grand resolved LUCENE-4161. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 4.0 Thanks, Mike! Committed (r1357159 on trunk and r13

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-4189) Test output should include timestamps (start/end for each test/ suite).

Dawid Weiss created LUCENE-4189: --- Summary: Test output should include timestamps (start/end for each test/ suite). Key: LUCENE-4189 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4189 Project: Lucene

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-4110) Report long periods of forked jvm inactivity (hung tests/ suites).

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dawid Weiss updated LUCENE-4110: Summary: Report long periods of forked jvm inactivity (hung tests/ suites). (was: Report log peri

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4110) Report long periods of forked jvm inactivity (hung tests/ suites).

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406412#comment-13406412 ] Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-4110: - (the above output is with an override to two s

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4110) Report long periods of forked jvm inactivity (hung tests/ suites).

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406411#comment-13406411 ] Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-4110: - I've set the default heartbeat to 60 seconds.

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-4080) SegmentReader.numDeletedDocs() sometimes gives an incorrect numDeletedDocs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adrien Grand resolved LUCENE-4080. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1) 4.0 Assignee

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4189) Test output should include timestamps (start/end for each test/ suite).

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406430#comment-13406430 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4189: - {quote} should this be optional (overrideable

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux-Java6-64 - Build # 1154 - Failure!

Build: http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux-Java6-64/1154/ 1 tests failed. REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.TestSqlEntityProcessorDeltaPrefixedPk.testDeltaImport_deleteResolvesUnprefixedPk Error Message: Exception during query Stack Trace: java.lang.Run

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-3594) SolrCore() doesn't wait SolrCore.getSearcher() to register _searcher

Egor Pahomov created SOLR-3594: -- Summary: SolrCore() doesn't wait SolrCore.getSearcher() to register _searcher Key: SOLR-3594 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3594 Project: Solr

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-3594) SolrCore() doesn't wait SolrCore.getSearcher() to register _searcher

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Egor Pahomov updated SOLR-3594: --- Attachment: testSearchersManagement.patch test reproducing the problem > SolrCore() d

Re: How to crash your jvm. :)

On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Dawid Weiss wrote: > I've been working on randomizing file.encoding for forked tests > JVMs... the second local run revealed a bug in the standard library, > try (linux/ unix systems, Java 1.7): This is unfortunate, but I think we should still pursue it? E.g. if o

[jira] [Assigned] (SOLR-3377) eDismax: A fielded query wrapped by parens is not recognized

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jan Høydahl reassigned SOLR-3377: - Assignee: (was: Jan Høydahl) Have not time to work on this for the next few months, so unassig

Re: How to crash your jvm. :)

Bug ID for this (will be visible in a while I guess): http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7181721 > This is unfortunate, but I think we should still pursue it? I am inclined to :) > I'd really like to run tests with a default charset of UTF-16 :) Me too. It's pretty successful at

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-3594) SolrCore() doesn't wait SolrCore.getSearcher() to register _searcher

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Egor Pahomov updated SOLR-3594: --- Attachment: 3594.patch > SolrCore() doesn't wait SolrCore.getSearcher() to register _searcher > --

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4190) IndexWriter deletes non-Lucene files

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406497#comment-13406497 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-4190: History repeats itself: LUCENE-3

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-4190) IndexWriter deletes non-Lucene files

Michael McCandless created LUCENE-4190: -- Summary: IndexWriter deletes non-Lucene files Key: LUCENE-4190 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4190 Project: Lucene - Java Issu

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4190) IndexWriter deletes non-Lucene files

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406500#comment-13406500 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4190: - I dont think we should do anything beyond 'mus

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4188) Storing Shapes shouldn't be Strategy dependent

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406504#comment-13406504 ] David Smiley commented on LUCENE-4188: -- Makes sense. Is telling Lucene to store a f

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-4.x-java7 - Build # 82 - Failure

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-4.x-java7/82/ 1 tests failed. REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.search.TestRealTimeGet.testStressReorderVersions Error Message: Thread threw an uncaught exception, thread: Thread[READER2,5,] Stack Trace: java.lang.RuntimeException: Thread th

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4190) IndexWriter deletes non-Lucene files

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406510#comment-13406510 ] Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-4190: I also raised an eyebrow when I read this commen

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4188) Storing Shapes shouldn't be Strategy dependent

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406513#comment-13406513 ] Chris Male commented on LUCENE-4188: bq. if the Strategy gives it to Lucene to index,

[jira] [Assigned] (LUCENE-4190) IndexWriter deletes non-Lucene files

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir reassigned LUCENE-4190: --- Assignee: Robert Muir (was: Michael McCandless) > IndexWriter deletes non-Lucene files

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4190) IndexWriter deletes non-Lucene files

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406517#comment-13406517 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4190: - We track the files, but what if your computer

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-4190) IndexWriter deletes non-Lucene files

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir updated LUCENE-4190: Attachment: LUCENE-4190.patch > IndexWriter deletes non-Lucene files > ---

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4190) IndexWriter deletes non-Lucene files

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406519#comment-13406519 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4190: - patch is against branch_4x >

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4190) IndexWriter deletes non-Lucene files

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406520#comment-13406520 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-4190: bq. Many of the lucene+facet dep

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4190) IndexWriter deletes non-Lucene files

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406521#comment-13406521 ] Andi Vajda commented on LUCENE-4190: I think that the way to "bound" the namespace of

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4190) IndexWriter deletes non-Lucene files

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406525#comment-13406525 ] Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-4190: Let's keep it simple, I agree.

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4190) IndexWriter deletes non-Lucene files

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406529#comment-13406529 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4190: - We can maybe improve in the future besides the

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4190) IndexWriter deletes non-Lucene files

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406541#comment-13406541 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-4190: --- Robert: assertSaneFiles is called directly

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4190) IndexWriter deletes non-Lucene files

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406542#comment-13406542 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4190: - nice catch, thanks for reviewing Uwe!

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-4190) IndexWriter deletes non-Lucene files

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir updated LUCENE-4190: Attachment: LUCENE-4190.patch > IndexWriter deletes non-Lucene files > ---

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3594) SolrCore() doesn't wait SolrCore.getSearcher() to register _searcher

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406556#comment-13406556 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-3594: The test could just do a simple search and that wo

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3594) SolrCore() doesn't wait SolrCore.getSearcher() to register _searcher

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406601#comment-13406601 ] Egor Pahomov commented on SOLR-3594: Is there any reason why we shouldn't? Constructor

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4190) IndexWriter deletes non-Lucene files

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406613#comment-13406613 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-4190: Patch looks good!

Re: Solr 3.6.0 javadocs are missing from the site

: that's not what I mean. api/ should die. but I'm ok with api-3 that points Well then you and i have radically differnet opinions about SEO and good long term URL practices. it's one thing to say that a URL like "/java/2_9_0/.../Foo.html" should be allowed to start 404ing once the 2.9.0 relea

Re: Solr 3.6.0 javadocs are missing from the site

On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: > > : that's not what I mean. api/ should die. but I'm ok with api-3 that points > > Well then you and i have radically differnet opinions about SEO and good > long term URL practices. clearly we do: i care about documentation not having brok

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-4190) IndexWriter deletes non-Lucene files

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-4190. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 5.0 > IndexWriter deletes non-Lucene files > ---

Re: Solr 3.6.0 javadocs are missing from the site

: > Well then you and i have radically differnet opinions about SEO and good : > long term URL practices. : : clearly we do: i care about documentation not having broken links. : : but linking to api/ is fucked up. Those links *will break* when the api changes. Some of the existing URLs will s

Re: Solr 3.6.0 javadocs are missing from the site

On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: > > : > Well then you and i have radically differnet opinions about SEO and good > : > long term URL practices. > : > : clearly we do: i care about documentation not having broken links. > : > : but linking to api/ is fucked up. Those links *w

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-4.x-Windows-Java7-64 - Build # 205 - Failure!

Build: http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-4.x-Windows-Java7-64/205/ 1 tests failed. REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.SuggesterFSTTest.testSuggestions Error Message: Exception during query Stack Trace: java.lang.RuntimeException: Exception during query at __

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4190) IndexWriter deletes non-Lucene files

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406640#comment-13406640 ] Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-4190: -- bq. I think that the way to "bound" the namespace of

RE: Solr 3.6.0 javadocs are missing from the site

I just repeat myself: I would make a perm redirect (301) from api/ -> api3/. api3/ -> api-3.6.0 would be a 302 redirect, as it is official. By this browsers will update their bookmarks and google bot will forget about the dying api/, too (with 301 redirect). Api3 is then official link to the a

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4190) IndexWriter deletes non-Lucene files

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406642#comment-13406642 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4190: - {quote} One sanity check: this may be an ortho

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4190) IndexWriter deletes non-Lucene files

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406644#comment-13406644 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-4190: -- bq. isn't that in theory already the point o

Re: Solr 3.6.0 javadocs are missing from the site

: > My primary concern is that as long as there are "current" javadocs : > somewhere, then /solr/api/.* should redirect to them so that existing : > linkages don't break. it's trivial to keep up to date, and it doesn't : > hurt anything. : : i dont think we should have a 'current' javadocs link

Re: Solr 3.6.0 javadocs are missing from the site

+1 to what UweSays On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote: > I just repeat myself: > > I would make a perm redirect (301) from api/ -> api3/. > api3/ -> api-3.6.0 would be a 302 redirect, as it is official. > > By this browsers will update their bookmarks and google bot will forget a

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4190) IndexWriter deletes non-Lucene files

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406646#comment-13406646 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4190: - Then its probably a good time to put those som

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4190) IndexWriter deletes non-Lucene files

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406648#comment-13406648 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-4190: -- How about we keep it simple and practical ov

RE: Solr 3.6.0 javadocs are missing from the site

: I would make a perm redirect (301) from api/ -> api3/. : api3/ -> api-3.6.0 would be a 302 redirect, as it is official. That assumes that anyone who linked or bookmarked "/api" specificly expected the 3.x links. /solr/api/... has existed since solr 1.1 and has always been updated to be the

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4190) IndexWriter deletes non-Lucene files

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406652#comment-13406652 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4190: - I'm not trying to be pedantic: I don't want th

Re: Solr 3.6.0 javadocs are missing from the site

On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: > > : I would make a perm redirect (301) from api/ -> api3/. > : api3/ -> api-3.6.0 would be a 302 redirect, as it is official. > > That assumes that anyone who linked or bookmarked "/api" specificly > expected the 3.x links. thats the whole

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3559) handle deleteByQuery reorders in distributed indexing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3559?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406659#comment-13406659 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-3559: OK, I think I finally nailed the last bug in this.

[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-3559) handle deleteByQuery reorders in distributed indexing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3559?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley resolved SOLR-3559. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 4.0 > handle deleteByQuery reorders in distributed index

Re: svn commit: r1357027 - /lucene/dev/trunk/solr/core/src/test/org/apache/solr/search/TestRealTimeGe t.java

On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: > > Yonik: would make sense to at least trigger this in the nightly?... > > final int deleteByQueryPercent = TEST_NIGHTLY ? (1+random().nextInt(7)) : 0; If the intention is to reduce time required for the test ... I would rather reduce itera

Re: Solr 3.6.0 javadocs are missing from the site

On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Robert Muir wrote: > same goes for download redirect links (I will open an issue tomorrow: > either we remove these download redirect llinks completely, or we fix > them to take versions I don't know the details behind the download redirect links except for the fac

Re: svn commit: r1357027 - /lucene/dev/trunk/solr/core/src/test/org/apache/solr/search/TestRealTimeGe t.java

I was working on SOLR-3559... I thought I had it nailed, so I committed it (and I couldn't update the JIRA issue because JIRA was down), along with enabling DBQ in the stress reorder versions test. That test started hitting errors on many of our jenkins boxes, so I reverted the test change while I

Re: Solr 3.6.0 javadocs are missing from the site

On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Robert Muir wrote: >> same goes for download redirect links (I will open an issue tomorrow: >> either we remove these download redirect llinks completely, or we fix >> them to take versions > > I don't know the

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4190) IndexWriter deletes non-Lucene files

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406669#comment-13406669 ] Andi Vajda commented on LUCENE-4190: If Joe user gives c:\ as their index directory,

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4083) RateLimited.pause() throws unchecked exception

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4083?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406670#comment-13406670 ] Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-4083: - I think I must back off the above -- I think t

Re: svn commit: r1357027 - /lucene/dev/trunk/solr/core/src/test/org/apache/solr/search/TestRealTimeGe t.java

On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > I was working on SOLR-3559... I thought I had it nailed, so I > committed it (and I couldn't update the JIRA issue because JIRA was > down), along with > enabling DBQ in the stress reorder versions test. That's great! > That test started hit

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4190) IndexWriter deletes non-Lucene files

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406671#comment-13406671 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4190: - now I'm ready to be pedantic: I refuse to let

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4190) IndexWriter deletes non-Lucene files

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406682#comment-13406682 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-4190: -- bq. Thats why i took this issue (and already

Loss of JIRA commit links!

It seems as if we've lost JIRA picking up SVN commits recently. Anyone know what's going on? -Yonik http://lucidimagination.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3591) Startup error not reflected in Solr web view

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3591?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406706#comment-13406706 ] Stefan Matheis (steffkes) commented on SOLR-3591: - hum, quick thought was,

multibyte file.encoding.

A few things came up, as always. Notably this one is a showstopper: https://github.com/carrotsearch/randomizedtesting/issues/116 I'll fix it tomorrow and push this forward. In the mean time I already have bugs to fix for those who are still awake: (run with -Dfile.encoding=UTF-16 from Eclipse).

Re: multibyte file.encoding.

definitely looks like mockpayloadfilter is buggy: suprised it hasn't bit us already On Jul 4, 2012 5:20 PM, "Dawid Weiss" wrote: > A few things came up, as always. Notably this one is a showstopper: > > https://github.com/carrotsearch/randomizedtesting/issues/116 > > I'll fix it tomorrow and push

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-1929) Index encrypted files

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406774#comment-13406774 ] Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-1929: --- Merged back to 4.0 beta in r1357427

[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-1929) Index encrypted files

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jan Høydahl resolved SOLR-1929. --- Resolution: Fixed > Index encrypted files > - > > Key: SOLR-19

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-1929) Index encrypted files

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406775#comment-13406775 ] Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-1929: --- Documentation updated: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4190) IndexWriter deletes non-Lucene files

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406784#comment-13406784 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4190: - I still plan to revert tomorrow. I think the c

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4190) IndexWriter deletes non-Lucene files

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406786#comment-13406786 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-4190: -- bq. I still plan to revert tomorrow. -1 Th

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4190) IndexWriter deletes non-Lucene files

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406789#comment-13406789 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4190: - pretty sure I have the right to revert my own

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-4.x-Windows-Java6-64 - Build # 237 - Failure!

Build: http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-4.x-Windows-Java6-64/237/ All tests passed Build Log: [...truncated 5 lines...] ERROR: Failed to update http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/branch_4x org.tmatesoft.svn.core.SVNException: svn: E204900: Unable to delete C:

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3377) eDismax: A fielded query wrapped by parens is not recognized

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406796#comment-13406796 ] Jack Krupansky commented on SOLR-3377: -- This seems like a rather serious bug to me, qu

Re: [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3377) eDismax: A fielded query wrapped by parens is not recognized

Yeah this impacts us too. Sent from my Mobile device 720-256-8076 On Jul 4, 2012, at 6:38 PM, "Jack Krupansky (JIRA)" wrote: > >[ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406796#comment-13406

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-4.x-Windows-Java7-64 - Build # 209 - Failure!

Build: http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-4.x-Windows-Java7-64/209/ 1 tests failed. REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.SuggesterTSTTest.testRebuild Error Message: Exception during query Stack Trace: java.lang.RuntimeException: Exception during query at __rand

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-2899) Add OpenNLP Analysis capabilities as a module

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406804#comment-13406804 ] Lance Norskog commented on LUCENE-2899: --- The Wiki is updated for testing and commit

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Lucene 4.0-alpha released.

Hey how do we use the MemoryCodec in Solr? Sent from my Mobile device 720-256-8076 On Jul 3, 2012, at 7:09 AM, Robert Muir wrote: > 3 July 2012, Apache Lucene‚ 4.0-alpha available > The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Lucene 4.0-alpha > > Apache Lucene is a high-perform

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4188) Storing Shapes shouldn't be Strategy dependent

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406819#comment-13406819 ] David Smiley commented on LUCENE-4188: -- Awesome. +1 > Storing Shape

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-4191) Lucene doc pages redirect to "api-4_0_0-ALPHA" which results in 404

Chaim Peck created LUCENE-4191: -- Summary: Lucene doc pages redirect to "api-4_0_0-ALPHA" which results in 404 Key: LUCENE-4191 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4191 Project: Lucene - Jav

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-4099) Remove generics from SpatialStrategy and remove SpatialFieldInfo

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Smiley resolved LUCENE-4099. -- Resolution: Fixed Committed to trunk & 4x. And never-mind my thought on adding isIndexed & isS

[jira] [Assigned] (LUCENE-4188) Storing Shapes shouldn't be Strategy dependent

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Smiley reassigned LUCENE-4188: Assignee: David Smiley > Storing Shapes shouldn't be Strategy dependent >

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-4192) SpatialStrategy: Remove isPolyField() and createField(shape)

David Smiley created LUCENE-4192: Summary: SpatialStrategy: Remove isPolyField() and createField(shape) Key: LUCENE-4192 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4192 Project: Lucene - Java

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4192) SpatialStrategy: Remove isPolyField() and createField(shape)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406842#comment-13406842 ] Chris Male commented on LUCENE-4192: +1 > SpatialStrategy: Remove i

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-4188) Storing Shapes shouldn't be Strategy dependent

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Smiley updated LUCENE-4188: - Attachment: LUCENE-4188_remove_field_storage_from_createField.patch Attached is the patch. I am

[JENKINS] Lucene-trunk - Build # 1981 - Still Failing

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-trunk/1981/ All tests passed Build Log: [...truncated 37937 lines...] [...truncated 37937 lines...] [...truncated 37937 lines...] [...truncated 37937 lines...] [...truncated 37937 lines...] [...truncated 37937 lines...] -

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4188) Storing Shapes shouldn't be Strategy dependent

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406859#comment-13406859 ] Chris Male commented on LUCENE-4188: Thanks for taking this on David. bq. I added a

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-trunk - Build # 1981 - Still Failing

I don't really get what is going on here, apart from that Clover is failing due to this test. The file it is looking for seems crazy, is that expected? Having looked at the test, I haven't come across the @ParametersFactory annotation before but maybe that somehow doesn't work with Clover? On Th

RE: [JENKINS] Lucene-trunk - Build # 1981 - Still Failing

Hi Chris, See my mail from yesterday: Clover does not have a problem with the code, it is more that the code nesting in this test is so deep, that the filename generated is too long for the underlying os. Maybe make test simplier with less code nesting (inner-inner-inner classes, too long v

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-3377) eDismax: A fielded query wrapped by parens is not recognized

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406866#comment-13406866 ] Bernd Fehling edited comment on SOLR-3377 at 7/5/12 6:10 AM: - I

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3377) eDismax: A fielded query wrapped by parens is not recognized

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406866#comment-13406866 ] Bernd Fehling commented on SOLR-3377: - I was willing to supply a final fix to this and

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-trunk - Build # 1981 - Still Failing

Thanks Uwe. Maybe I'm blind but I can't really see any inner classes in this test (or the classes it extends). The file names seems to contain the parameters used to run the test method, I'm not sure where these values are taken from so I don't know how to compress them. On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 5

RE: [JENKINS] Lucene-trunk - Build # 1981 - Still Failing

Let's trick clover, by adding magic comments: ///CLOVER:OFF . code . ///CLOVER:ON See https://confluence.atlassian.com/display/CLOVER026/Using+Source+Directives Uwe - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4190) IndexWriter deletes non-Lucene files

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406874#comment-13406874 ] Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-4190: What if we had an object called IndexFileNames w

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4190) IndexWriter deletes non-Lucene files

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406877#comment-13406877 ] Gilad Barkai commented on LUCENE-4190: -- Perhaps out of context, but here goes.. User

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4190) IndexWriter deletes non-Lucene files

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406879#comment-13406879 ] selckin commented on LUCENE-4190: - what if you accidentally call deleteAll() on your prod

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LUCENE-4190) IndexWriter deletes non-Lucene files

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13406879#comment-13406879 ] selckin edited comment on LUCENE-4190 at 7/5/12 6:54 AM: -