[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5618?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14001008#comment-14001008
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5618:
Thanks Rob!
bq. My only concern (which can be a
Opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5679.
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
>
> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 7:03 PM, Chris Hostetter
> wrote:
> >
> > : I was looking
Shai Erera created LUCENE-5679:
--
Summary: Consolidate IndexWriter.deleteDocuments()
Key: LUCENE-5679
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5679
Project: Lucene - Core
Issue Type: Imp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14000997#comment-14000997
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-5650:
-
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14000993#comment-14000993
]
Brett Lucey commented on SOLR-5079:
---
I don't think this patch would work (as is) if the d
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5854?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14000992#comment-14000992
]
Brett Lucey commented on SOLR-5854:
---
Hmn. I think you might be using the facet.sort para
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5666?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14000961#comment-14000961
]
David Smiley commented on LUCENE-5666:
--
Ok, I see that now; it's good.
> Add Uninve
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-5678:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-5678.patch
New patch, now fixes RateLimiter and nukes BufferedIndexOutput.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14000902#comment-14000902
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-5650:
-
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5675?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14000896#comment-14000896
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-5675:
-
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-5678:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-5678.patch
New patch to make sure BufferedOutputStream is flushed on close(
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14000889#comment-14000889
]
Ryan Ernst commented on LUCENE-5650:
Sorry about that. The nocommit was left by mist
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14000888#comment-14000888
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-5650:
-
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-5678:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-5678.patch
Hi,
I cleaned up most of the code. This now makes BufferedIndex
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14000891#comment-14000891
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-5650:
---
Commit 15955
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-5678:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-5678.patch
> Investigate to use FileoutputStream instead of RandomAccessFil
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14000885#comment-14000885
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-5678:
Indexing perf of new patch looks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14000867#comment-14000867
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-5678:
I tested index time for full Wik
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-5678:
--
Attachment: (was: LUCENE-5678.patch)
> Investigate to use FileoutputStream instead of Rand
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5675?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14000850#comment-14000850
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-5675:
-
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14000801#comment-14000801
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-5678 at 5/17/14 5:56 PM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-5678:
--
Description:
We no longer allow seeking in IndexOutput, so there is no need to use
RandomAcce
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Tom Burton-West wrote:
> I understand its expensive, but it appears that it is not freeing up memory
> after each debugQuery is run. That seems like it should be avoidable (I say
> that without having looked at the code). Should I open a JIRA about a
> possible
Thanks Mikhail,
I understand its expensive, but it appears that it is not freeing up memory
after each debugQuery is run. That seems like it should be avoidable (I
say that without having looked at the code). Should I open a JIRA about a
possible memory leak?
Tom
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 8:20
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14000814#comment-14000814
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-5970:
---
Collections API responses really need an overhaul I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2809?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-2809:
---
Attachment: SOLR-2809.patch
OK, here's a proof-of-concept lease manager that implements the core
func
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-5678:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-5678.patch
Very simple patch.
[~mikemccand]: It would be good to compare p
Uwe Schindler created LUCENE-5678:
-
Summary: Investigate to use FileoutputStream instead of
RandomAccessFile in FSIndexOutput
Key: LUCENE-5678
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5678
Pr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14000794#comment-14000794
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-4371:
-
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-4371.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 5.0
> consider refactoring slicer to indexinput.slice
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-5677.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 5.0
4.9
> Simplify position handling
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5666?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14000784#comment-14000784
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-5666:
-
I think you missed the point. it does not have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14000786#comment-14000786
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-5677:
-
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5666?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14000782#comment-14000782
]
David Smiley commented on LUCENE-5666:
--
Oh, right. I'll repost it here for everyone
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14000783#comment-14000783
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-5677:
-
Commit
Test bug: i committed a fix.
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Policeman Jenkins Server
wrote:
> Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/10320/
> Java: 32bit/jdk1.7.0_55 -client -XX:+UseG1GC
>
> 1 tests failed.
> REGRESSION:
> org.apache.lucene.uninverting.TestFieldCacheVsD
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-5677:
Attachment: LUCENE-5677.patch
Slightly tweaked patch: just handles the offsets with the same logic
For Sure. Lucene's explain is really expensive and is not purposed for
production use, but only for rare troubleshooting. As a mitigation measure
you can scroll result set by small portions more efficient like Hoss
recently explained at SearchHub. In such kind of problems, usually it's
possible to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-4371:
Attachment: LUCENE-4371.patch
Added missing \@Override
By the way, i noticed something when refac
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14000748#comment-14000748
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-4371:
---
bq. What javadocs? This is not a public cl
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/10320/
Java: 32bit/jdk1.7.0_55 -client -XX:+UseG1GC
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
org.apache.lucene.uninverting.TestFieldCacheVsDocValues.testHugeBinaryValues
Error Message:
Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError
at
__randomi
it was my bug, i recently added these tests
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 4:32 AM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> Grrr, thanks Rob.
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
>
> On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 1:22 AM, wrote:
>> Author: rmuir
>> Date: Sat May 17 05:22:33 2014
>> New Revision:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14000737#comment-14000737
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4371:
-
{quote}
We should add @Override here, because
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14000722#comment-14000722
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-4371:
+1, this is an awesome simplific
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14000713#comment-14000713
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-5677:
+1, much better!
> Simplify pos
+1
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 7:03 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : I was looking at IW.deleteDocs() API, and was wondering why do we have both
> : deleteDocuments(Term) and deleteDocuments(Term...). Why can't we have just
> : the vararg one? Same ap
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14000715#comment-14000715
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-4371:
---
Btw, thanks for hiding and making the conc
Grrr, thanks Rob.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 1:22 AM, wrote:
> Author: rmuir
> Date: Sat May 17 05:22:33 2014
> New Revision: 1595425
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1595425
> Log:
> improve test
>
> Modified:
> lucene/dev/branches/branch_4x/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14000706#comment-14000706
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-4371:
---
Looks cool.
I was a bit confused about By
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5663?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14000695#comment-14000695
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-5663:
---
I think the main problem here is just the
Got it. Will do so, and amend my JIRA ticket to include this as well as
tests.
Thanks!
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 2:21 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> you have to capture state on the first token before inserting new ones.
> When inserting a new token, **solely** call restoreState();
> cle
51 matches
Mail list logo
