Re: Communicating the future of DIH?

2020-11-03 Thread Mike Drob
I'm somewhat unclear - is the suggestion to submit projects to Apache Commons repositories or to do a similar process with our own multiple repositories. On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 2:43 PM Gézapeti wrote: > I'm not that close with Apache Commons either, but I think the > solr-operator is a perfect

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.7.0 RC1

2020-11-03 Thread Cassandra Targett
I’m really late to the party since I was offline for the weekend and catching up yesterday, but the Draft Ref Guide for 8.7 is up (late):  https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_7/ I’ll update to the final version when it’s released, I should have plenty of time for that in the back half of

Re: Communicating the future of DIH?

2020-11-03 Thread Gézapeti
I'm not that close with Apache Commons either, but I think the solr-operator is a perfect candidate to figure out how things should work. I'd be happy to do some exploration and reach out to other projects about their experience in this matter. gp On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 9:31 PM David Smiley

Re: Communicating the future of DIH?

2020-11-03 Thread David Smiley
Thanks Gezapeti for recommending that model. It makes sense to me conceptually... yet it seems burdensome, at least to set it up (website, lists, repos, misc.) and get us familiar with a new way of working. I have nothing but questions about how they operate. As it is, we haven't even done our

Re: Maintaining Unnecessary Test Files

2020-11-03 Thread David Smiley
On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 1:50 PM Marcus Eagan wrote: > @David Smiley It would seem to me that > TestSpatialFilter would be fine with no mention of the port in the name. > It's a confusing identifier. > Feel free to propose a better name and file a PR. It's lineage (origins from Solr) is however

Re: Maintaining Unnecessary Test Files

2020-11-03 Thread Marcus Eagan
@David Smiley It would seem to me that TestSpatialFilter would be fine with no mention of the port in the name. It's a confusing identifier. As for TestGeo3dShapeWGS84ModelRectRelation, there are lots of comments. Not sure what the value of this comment is in the class /* [junit4] 1> S-R

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene » Lucene-Solr-Check-master - Build # 699 - Still Failing!

2020-11-03 Thread Dawid Weiss
I corrected sandbox class name reference that was the problem here. Dawid On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 2:39 PM Apache Jenkins Server wrote: > > Build: > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Lucene/job/Lucene-Solr-Check-master/699/ > > All tests passed > > Build Log: > [...truncated 1619 lines...] >

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene » Lucene-Solr-Check-master - Build # 698 - Failure!

2020-11-03 Thread Dawid Weiss
These randomized test failures reproduce for me in this test. Dawid On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 8:30 AM Apache Jenkins Server wrote: > > Build: > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Lucene/job/Lucene-Solr-Check-master/698/ > > 1 tests failed. > FAILED: