Re: Misconfigured gradle rat inputs?

Yep, looks like missing inputs and the task is skipped. Good catch, Alan. I can look a this later too, Uwe (just create an issue and assign to me). On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 7:40 PM Uwe Schindler wrote: > Hi, > > the problem is that the RAT task has only some patterns for filenames as > input, but

Re: Misconfigured gradle rat inputs?

I will defer to the sophisticated gradle policeman on this! > On 25 May 2021, at 18:40, Uwe Schindler wrote: > > Hi, > > the problem is that the RAT task has only some patterns for filenames as > input, but no actual @InputDirectory. If the files change, nothing changes > from Gradle's point

RE: Misconfigured gradle rat inputs?

Hi, the problem is that the RAT task has only some patterns for filenames as input, but no actual @InputDirectory. If the files change, nothing changes from Gradle's point of view. The validation/rat-sources.gradle and its inner class "RatTask" must at least declare @InputDirectory with a defa

Misconfigured gradle rat inputs?

There’s a subject line I never thought I’d type :) Firstly: can I say how much I appreciate all the work that’s gone into the gradle build? I’ve been doing lots of small PRs for the spans-to-queries work and being able to run checks multiple times in an extremely efficient manner has been a lif

Re: Circuit Breakers -- SOLR-15056

Has anyone had a chance to look at this for 8.9? wunder Walter Underwood wun...@wunderwood.org http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) > On May 6, 2021, at 10:03 AM, Walter Underwood wrote: > > Understood, getting well is more important. > > wunder > Walter Underwood > wun...@wunderwood.org

Re: Release Lucene/Solr 8.9.0 should we have it soon

Hello, Eric was going to have a look at the PR. But if it isn't done in time then I don't think it needs to block the release Thanks On Tue, 25 May 2021 at 15:50, Mayya Sharipova wrote: > Hello Colvin, > I am wondering if you still want to merge SOLR-15410 for the Lucene/Solr > 8.9 release? > S

Re: Release Lucene/Solr 8.9.0 should we have it soon

Hello Colvin, I am wondering if you still want to merge SOLR-15410 for the Lucene/Solr 8.9 release? Should we have a deadline for feature freeze? Say May 30th (Sunday)? Thank you. On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 8:49 AM Noble Paul wrote: > +1 > > > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 9:30 PM Colvin Cowie > wrote:

Re: Should segment order impact hit count estimation?

Great, thanks for the explanation Adrien! I still learn something new about Lucene every day ;) Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 1:38 PM Adrien Grand wrote: > Indeed collectors keep state about the minimum required score for a hit to > be competitive, ty

Re: What is the status and what are the next steps re k-nn search?

Awesome, thanks Michael! Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 2:57 PM Michael Wechner wrote: > Hi Michael > > Thanks very much for your feedback! > > I have added a FAQ > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/LuceneFAQ#LuceneFAQ-DoesLucenesup

Re: Lucene 9.0 snapshot names

> On a different note, does gradle use the same configuration for when we do > actual releases? I’m still confused as to why it wanted my GPG password in > plaintext in a file somewhere. > I don't think we've done a proper release with gradle workflow. I can't remember doing much in that area - it

Re: Lucene 9.0 snapshot names

> On 25 May 2021, at 11:24, Dawid Weiss > wrote: > > > Ok. In that case we can make it simpler by not adding the signing plugin to > that (local) maven publication? Unless it makes sense to have it. Let me > know, this is a trivial change. +1, that would be gre

Re: Lucene 9.0 snapshot names

Ok. In that case we can make it simpler by not adding the signing plugin to that (local) maven publication? Unless it makes sense to have it. Let me know, this is a trivial change. D. On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 8:36 AM Uwe Schindler wrote: > Maven consumers only needs checksums to work correctly.