Hello,
Eric was going to have a look at the PR.
But if it isn't done in time then I don't think it needs to block the
release

Thanks

On Tue, 25 May 2021 at 15:50, Mayya Sharipova
<mayya.sharip...@elastic.co.invalid> wrote:

> Hello Colvin,
> I am wondering if you still want to merge SOLR-15410 for the Lucene/Solr
> 8.9 release?
> Should we have a deadline for feature freeze? Say May 30th (Sunday)?
>
> Thank you.
>
> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 8:49 AM Noble Paul <noble.p...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 9:30 PM Colvin Cowie <colvin.cowie....@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I raised SOLR-15410 yesterday with a PR to fix an issue with GC logging
>> when using new versions of OpenJ9. It's small, so if somebody could have a
>> look at it in time for 8.9 that would be great
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Colvin
>> >
>> > On Thu, 13 May 2021 at 17:52, Nhat Nguyen <nhat.ngu...@elastic.co.invalid>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi Mayya,
>> >>
>> >> I would like to backport LUCENE-9935, which enables bulk-merge for
>> stored fields with index sort, to 8.x this weekend. The patch is ready, but
>> we prefer to give CI some cycles before backporting. Please let me know if
>> it's okay with the release plan.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Nhat
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 12:44 PM Gus Heck <gus.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Perhaps https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15378 should be
>> investigated before 8.9, maybe make it a blocker?
>> >>>
>> >>> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 1:35 AM Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Mayya, I created backport for Adrien's issue here, to try to help
>> out:
>> >>>> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2495
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Personally, I felt that merging non-trivial changes from main branch
>> >>>> to 8.x has some additional risks when cherry-picking:
>> >>>> * structural changes in main branch making merging more difficult
>> >>>> (e.g. LUCENE-9705 reorganization of codec versioning, great change
>> >>>> moving forwards though)
>> >>>> * there are many style changes due to spotless in main branch which
>> >>>> add noise to merging against old code.
>> >>>> * In the specific case of LUCENE-9827, the usual additional tricky
>> >>>> backwards compatibility for 8.x must be added in the backport (due to
>> >>>> minor version bumps there) which can go wrong.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I still think that particular change is worth considering for 8.9, it
>> >>>> isn't just a performance bug but also a huge improvement to test
>> >>>> coverage that helps combat risks.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> But we should still take some precautions when releasing an 8.x IMO:
>> >>>> * be mindful of what we are backporting and the risks involved: it
>> is harder.
>> >>>> * try to let jenkins bake changes in 8.x branches for longer than
>> >>>> usual? even a few days really helps.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 1:29 PM Mayya Sharipova
>> >>>> <mayya.sharip...@elastic.co.invalid> wrote:
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > Thanks everyone,
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > Adrien, I  am happy to try to be a release manager for this
>> release.
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > Adrien, and Gus, please let me know when your changes are merged
>> to 8.x
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 10:38 AM Gus Heck <gus.h...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> I'm also looking to find time to get
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14597 into some sort of 8x.
>> I've recently completed the back port of 2/3 of the lucene tickets that are
>> related, and hope to work on the third tomorrow....
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> I had some feedback there, but I think folks were waiting for the
>> version integrated with the final form of the Lucene tickets before delving
>> further. Hopefully this week I can start on a patch that does that.
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 10:25 AM Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>> I would like to backport LUCENE-9827 before we release 8.9, a
>> performance regression to stored fields merges. I'll work on this as soon
>> as possible.
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>> On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 10:28 PM Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>> >>>>
>> >>>> >>>> +1
>> >>>> >>>>
>> >>>> >>>> Mayya, are you volunteering to be the release manager?
>> >>>> >>>>
>> >>>> >>>> Le jeu. 6 mai 2021 à 18:06, Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
>> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>> >>>> >>>>>
>> >>>> >>>>> +1
>> >>>> >>>>>
>> >>>> >>>>> On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 7:50 PM Mayya Sharipova <
>> mayya.sharip...@elastic.co.invalid> wrote:
>> >>>> >>>>>>
>> >>>> >>>>>> Hello everyone,
>> >>>> >>>>>> I was wondering if we can have a 8.9.0 release. It has been
>> more than 3 months since 8.8.0 was released.
>> >>>> >>>>>> 8.9.0 doesn't need to be the last release in the 8.x series.
>> >>>> >>>>>>
>> >>>> >>>>>> Thanks.
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>> --
>> >>>> >>> Adrien
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> --
>> >>>> >> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
>> >>>> >> http://www.the111shift.com (play)
>> >>>>
>> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
>> >>> http://www.the111shift.com (play)
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> -----------------------------------------------------
>> Noble Paul
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>

Reply via email to