Re: Index documents in async way

> The biggest problem I have with this is that the client doesn't know about indexing problems without awkward callbacks later to see if something went wrong. Even simple stuff like a schema problem (e.g. undefined field). It's a useful *option*, any way. > Currently we now guarantee that if solr

Re: Index documents in async way

> Can there be a situation where the index writer fails after the document was added to tlog and a success is sent to the user? I think we want to avoid such a situation, isn't it? > I suppose failures would be returned to the client one the async response? To make things more clear, the response f

Re: Performance testing is necessary now

> > Another note here is problems come and go away in unpredictable ways. Before SOLR-14665 I never thought about doing a performance test of creating thousands of collections. The problem here is the same with our tests, even Solr has a huge number of tests, bugs still happen here and there, somet

Re: Solr: JoinAtHead seems problematic

Sure! Vào Th 6, 7 thg 8, 2020 lúc 07:33 Erick Erickson đã viết: > Well, let me know if you have to dive into that and we can wrestle it to > the ground. I suppose the short answer is “that code is correct if I > remember correctly”…. > > > On Aug 6, 2020, at 8:22 PM, Đạt

Re: Solr: JoinAtHead seems problematic

Thank Erick, I'm not fully understand it, but it kinda makes sense somehow. Thank you! On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 6:40 PM Erick Erickson wrote: > Dat: > > That’s a confusingly-named variable, surely needs a comment. Remembering > from a long time ago trying to work with PreferredLeader, the proble

Re: SolrClient and making requests asynchronously

The new API seems good to me. it does be able to handle all cases : future, listener and error handling. On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 10:15 AM David Smiley wrote: > Noble: Those sound like some big and bold ideas that are deserving of a > separate conversation? My proposal here is based on the APIs w

Re: Welcome Michael Sokolov to the PMC

Congrats Michael! On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 4:40 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > Congrats and welcome, Mike! > > On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 2:21 AM Yonik Seeley wrote: > >> Congrats Michael! >> -Yonik >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 7:57 AM Adrien Grand wrote: >> >>> I am

Re: 8.5 release

+1 On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 8:38 AM Shalin Shekhar Mangar < shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 7:58 AM Alan Woodward > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> It’s been a while since we released lucene-solr 8.4, and we’ve >> accumulated quite a few nice new features since then. I’

Re: Congratulations to the new Lucene/Solr PMC Chair, Anshum Gupta!

Congrats Anshum!! On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 08:43, Michael McCandless wrote: > Congrats Anshum! It's great fun! > > Mike > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 6:24 PM Steve Rowe wrote: > >> Congrats Anshum! >> >> -- >> Steve >> >> >> On Jan 15, 2020, at 4:15 PM, Cassandra Targett >> wrote: >> >> Every yea

Re: Welcome Houston Putman as Lucene/Solr committer

Congrats and welcome Houston!! On Thu, 14 Nov 2019 at 11:54, David Smiley wrote: > Congrats Houston! Woohoo! > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 3:58 AM Anshum Gupta > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Please join me in welcoming Houston Putman as the latest Lucene/Solr >> committer! >> >> Houston has been in

Re: 8.3 release

ry - IMHO it should be at least well investigated before 8.3 in >>>> order to determine whether it causes real damage (apart from looking scary >>>> and filling the logs). >>>> >>>> +1 from me. >>>> >>>> On 9 Oct 2019, at 10:

Re: 8.3 release

Hi Ishan, guys I want to include the fix for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13293 in this release. Hoping that is ok! Thanks! On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 4:02 PM Uwe Schindler wrote: > ASF Jenkins Jobs also reconfigured. > > I left the 8.2 Refguide job in the queue (I cloned it), not su

Re: NVMe - SSD shredding due to Lucene :-)

Thanks Uwe for keeping the Police up and running! On Sat, 31 Aug 2019 at 11:20, Uwe Schindler wrote: > Hi all, > > I just wanted to inform you that I asked the provider of the Policeman > Jenkins Server to replace the first of two NVMe SSDs, because it failed > with fatal warnings due to too man

Re: 8.1.2 bug fix release

Thanks Steve! On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 at 22:35, Steve Rowe wrote: > I've disabled the ASF Jenkins 8.1 jobs. > > -- > Steve > > On Jul 10, 2019, at 9:39 AM, Đạt Cao Mạnh wrote: > > Hi Adrien, > > Yeah, I am good with skipping/canceling 8.1.2 and focusing on 8.2 no

Re: Lucene/Solr 8.2.0

Hi Ignacio, 8.1.2 bugfix release will cancelled. You can go ahead with 8.2 release. Thanks! On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 at 20:38, Tomoko Uchida wrote: > Hi, > I opened a blocker issue a while ago for release 8.2: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8907 > > Sorry about that, I noticed the b

Re: 8.1.2 bug fix release

-node requests) but we don't test that configuration anymore in Sole > so I am hesitant to suggest it. > > > > > > I think that either we agree to upgrade jetty to 9.4.19 in this point > release or we scrap it altogether and focus on 8.2. > > > > > > On

Re: 8.1.2 bug fix release

enforces Java 8 only. > > Uwe > > Am July 4, 2019 2:22:40 AM UTC schrieb "Đạt Cao Mạnh" < > caomanhdat...@gmail.com>: >> >> Thanks Uwe, Steve >> >> I'm not familiar with the pipeline of smoker-release but I assumpt that >> the same pipelin

Re: 8.1.2 bug fix release

Thanks Uwe, Steve I'm not familiar with the pipeline of smoker-release but I assumpt that the same pipeline will be run during release process in my machine and anyone who do the vote. So It won't be a blocker for this release and I can continue with the release process, is that correct?

Re: 8.1.2 bug fix release

Hi Anshum, I kinda think we should not do that since 8.1.2 is a bug fix only release. On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 11:56 PM Anshum Gupta wrote: > Hi Dat, > > Can we also get SOLR-13507 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13507> in for 8.1.2 ? > > On Wed, Jul 3, 2019

Re: 8.1.2 bug fix release

Thanks Andrzej! On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 6:41 PM Andrzej Białecki wrote: > Dat, > > The fix for SOLR-13583 has been committed to branch_8_1. > > On 3 Jul 2019, at 04:56, Đạt Cao Mạnh wrote: > > Hi Steve, > > I'm seeing this failure > > [smoker] subproce

Re: 8.1.2 bug fix release

nnect to that jenkins box? Thanks a lot! On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 9:52 AM Đạt Cao Mạnh wrote: > Hi guys, > > I'm seeing several Lucene test failures for branch_8_1. Should they be > marked as badApples? > https://builds.apache.org/view/L/view/Lucene/job/Lucene-Solr-Tests-8.1/73/

Re: 8.1.2 bug fix release

28 PM Ignacio Vera wrote: > Thanks! it is done. > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 5:19 PM Đạt Cao Mạnh > wrote: > >> Ok, I'm hoping these two are these last ones. >> > -- *Best regards,* *Cao Mạnh Đạt* *E-mail: caomanhdat...@gmail.com *

Re: 8.1.2 bug fix release

Ok, I'm hoping these two are these last ones.

Re: 8.1.2 bug fix release

gt; Ignacio > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 1:39 AM Steve Rowe wrote: > >> Hi Đạt, I re-enabled the ASF Jenkins 8.1 jobs. - Steve >> >> On Jun 24, 2019, at 8:09 AM, Đạt Cao Mạnh >> wrote: >> >> Hi Uwe, Steve. >> >> Can Jenkins on b

Re: 8.1.2 bug fix release

On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 2:11 PM Đạt Cao Mạnh > wrote: > > > > Hi Ishan, > > > > If upgrade Jetty seems too much for a bug fix release, I will try to > upgrade only part that affect SOLR-13413 (one module). Then see how tests > will behave then. Does that sound goo

Re: VOTE: Apache Solr Reference Guide for Solr 8.1

+1 On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 9:39 PM Jan Høydahl wrote: > +1 > > Jan Høydahl > > 12. jun. 2019 kl. 16:47 skrev Cassandra Targett : > > Please vote to release the Solr Reference Guide for 8.1 > > The PDF artifacts can be downloaded from: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/solr/ref-gu

Re: 8.1.2 bug fix release

ated >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13541 specifically for the >> Jetty upgrade. >> >> Kevin Risden >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 4:47 PM Đạt Cao Mạnh >> wrote: >> >>> Hi David, yeah sure, that bug fix seems important. >

Re: 8.1.2 bug fix release

ng. Also, lets get this serious bug fix in: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13523 > > ~ David Smiley > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 9:27 AM Đạt Cao Mạnh > wrote: > >> Hi,

8.1.2 bug fix release

Hi, Just right after the 8.1.1 release has been published we’ve discovered a serious bug in BasicAuthentication which affect all released versions of Solr including 8.0, 8.1, 8.1.1. Details of the bug can be found in SOLR-13510. I’m volunteering to do this release, if there are no objections, and

Re: VOTE: Apache Solr Reference Guide for Solr 8.0

+1 Looks good to me. On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 2:19 PM Joel Bernstein wrote: > +1 > > Joel Bernstein > http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ > > > On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 8:54 AM Cassandra Targett > wrote: > >> Jan, would you please suggest exact wording to correct the error you >> pointed out (quoted belo

Re: Welcome Michael Sokolov as Lucene/ Solr committer

Welcome Michael! On Mon, 13 May 2019 at 22:10, David Smiley wrote: > Congratulations and welcome Mike! Well deserved. > > ~ David Smiley > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > > On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 3:12 PM Dawid Weiss wrote: > >> Hello everyone,

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.1.0 RC1

Hi Ishan, Should we respin the release for SOLR-13449. On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 17:45, Kevin Risden wrote: > +1 SUCCESS! [1:15:45.039228] > > Kevin Risden > > > On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 11:12 AM David Smiley > wrote: > >> +1 >> SUCCESS! [1:29:43.016321] >> >> Thanks for doing the release Ishan! >>

Re: Fwd: Lucene/Solr 8.0

a little breathing > room for > > >> > finishing up 8.0 blockers? And looking at the change log there > appear to be a > > >> > healthy list of features, bug fixes, and improvements to both Solr > and Lucene > > >> > that warrant a 7.6 release? Pers

Re: Welcome Tomoko Uchida as Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome and congrats Tomoko! On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 7:11 AM Karl Wright wrote: > Welcome! > Karl > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 8:28 PM Christian Moen wrote: > >> Congratulations, Tomoko-san! >> >> On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 12:20 AM Uwe Schindler wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Please join me in welcom

Re: Call for help: moving from ant build to gradle

Cool Diego, I will take a look on this. Thanks a lot!

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.0.0 RC2

For clarification: > > But this does not disable the HTTP/2 listener, it just makes SolrJ no > longer use the Http2SolrClient and fall back to the old one. This is true and it is not a bug. The reason here is for rolling updates, since -Dsolr.http1=true nodes can *send* and *accept *requests *to/f

Re: Welcome Ignacio Vera to the PMC

Congrats Ignacio! On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 2:09 PM jim ferenczi wrote: > Welcome and congrats Ignacio! > > Le lun. 4 mars 2019 à 15:03, David Smiley a > écrit : > >> Welcome Ignacio! >> >> On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 7:53 AM Jason Gerlowski >> wrote: >> >>> Congrats Ignacio! >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 4, 20

Re: Welcome Jason Gerlowski to the PMC

Welcome, Jason! On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 at 15:28, Adrien Grand wrote: > Welcome, Jason! > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 4:21 PM Jan Høydahl wrote: > > > > I am pleased to announce that Jason Gerlowski has accepted the PMC's > invitation to join. > > > > Welcome Jason! > > > > -- > > Jan Høydahl, search

Re: HTTP/2 support completely missing in CHANGES.txt

Hi Uwe, All announement in solr/CHANGES.txt were removed in a merge, I added them back. Please kindly review them. Thanks! On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 1:51 PM Uwe Schindler wrote: > Hi, > > I just reviewed the Lucene/Solr 8 changes text (in preparation to my > FOSDEM talk) and figured out that the

Re: Congratulations to the new Lucene/Solr PMC chair, Cassandra Targett

Congratulations, Cassandra! On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 4:37 AM Michael McCandless wrote: > Congrats Cassandra!! > > Mike > > On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 5:32 PM Karl Wright wrote: > >> Congratulations! >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 5:20 PM Michael Sokolov >> wrote: >> >>> Heavy is the head that we

Re: Poll: Merge jira/http2 to master branch

8 at 2:24 PM Đạt Cao Mạnh > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> HTTP2 *without* TLS is possible. That mode is called h2c. ( >> https://http2.github.io/http2-spec/) >> >> On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 5:32 PM Uwe Schindler wrote: >> >>> It's inoffic

Re: Poll: Merge jira/http2 to master branch

HTTP2 >> was strongly tying itself to encryption although it was technically >> possible to have plaintext. >> >> On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 11:29 AM Đạt Cao Mạnh >> wrote: >> >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> | So I think the best idea is to only support J

Re: Poll: Merge jira/http2 to master branch

Hi guys, | So I think the best idea is to only support Java 9+, if you want HTTP2 and TLS. +1 for this I think the support for Java 8 + SSL + HTTP/2 by using Conscrypt or other methods can be done later, it is not necessary for merging http2 branch to master.

Re: Poll: Merge jira/http2 to master branch

Hi Uwe, To enable Conscrypt we have include several related Jetty libraries, the same thing will need to be done if we uses Java 9 ALPN. So support both security providers and testing them is kinda painful in my point of view. On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 4:16 PM Đạt Cao Mạnh wrote: > Hi fo

Re: Poll: Merge jira/http2 to master branch

ink > enabling conscrypt is easy with reflection only, or do we need to compile > hard against it. From what I figured out, it’s only used at a few places. > > > > SolrJ should by default ship without conscyrpt (make it “optional” maven > dependency). If it’s in classpath, enabl

Re: Poll: Merge jira/http2 to master branch

Hi, I will try to summary all the options here 1. No support for HTTP/2 + SSL at all, if users want to run SSL they must stick with HTTP/1.1 2. Set Java requirement to 9 and use ALPN implementation of JDK 9 3. If users want to use HTTP/2, we will notice about license problem then download and use

Re: Poll: Merge jira/http2 to master branch

Hi Uwe, It seems that is conflict between settings default security provider of conscrypt and httpclient. I will try to resolve that problem today. Thanks! On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 9:11 AM Simon Willnauer wrote: > folks, > > I just want to ask if this is an issue or not but this branch is > ass

Re: Poll: Merge jira/http2 to master branch

s sounds like it will put a ton of work > on somebody else plate? I mean mark is spending a lot of time on the tests > and this would make his life even harder? > > > > I don't think we should do this. > > > > simon > > > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 12:0

Poll: Merge jira/http2 to master branch

Hi guys, The changes in jira/http2 branch is very close to be commit now, but the current state of tests make me quite nervous about merging. I have a local Jenkins job for testing jira/http2 and the result is quite bad so far. I'm not sure failures caused by jira/http2 changes or the master branc

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.6

Hi guys, Is it ok for backporting SOLR-12969 to branch_7_6? On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 3:50 PM Steve Rowe wrote: > Hi Cassandra, > > > On Nov 9, 2018, at 3:47 PM, Cassandra Targett > wrote: > > > > I don't know if it's on the Release ToDo list, but we need a Jenkins job > for the Ref Guide to be

Re: Call for help: moving from ant build to gradle

; >>> great work. I had some time to look into it, looks good as a start. > I agree > > there is a lot of work to be done, especially the additional tasks for > > regenerating sources, extracting data from ICU, quality checks, > > documentation (XSLT). Also the

Call for help: moving from ant build to gradle

Hi guys, Recently, I had a chance of working on modifying different build.xml of our project. To be honest that was a painful experience, especially the number of steps for adding a new module in our project. We reach the limitation point of Ant and moving to Gradle seems a good option since it ha

Re: Welcome Gus Heck as Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome, Gus! On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 2:54 PM Jan Høydahl wrote: > Welcome, Gus! > > -- > Jan Høydahl, search solution architect > Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com > > 1. nov. 2018 kl. 13:22 skrev David Smiley : > > Hi all, > > Please join me in welcoming Gus Heck as the latest Lucene/Solr commit

Re: Lucene/Solr 8.0

ke to create a Lucene 8 >>>>> branch soon (next week for instance ? ). There are some work to do to make >>>>> sure that all tests pass, add the new version... >>>>> >> I can take care of it if there are no objections. Creating the >>>>>

Re: [DISCUSS] Moving from Ant build to Gradle

ld (and > the shadow maven build) that migration becomes a lot of work to swtich > everythin at once. The last time I looked, though, was about 1.5 years ago. > It is something I would like to pick back up, but still do not have the > time to invest personally. > > On Wed, Oct 10,

[DISCUSS] Moving from Ant build to Gradle

Hi all, Recently I wanted to create another module in Solr to group all common dependencies of Server and Solrj module. It seems that to do such kind of thing is very painful, including hacks and adding support for different ide and maven. Should we consider on moving to Gradle which seems better

Re: Lucene/Solr 8.0

Hi Jim, I really want to introduce the support of HTTP/2 into Solr 8.0 (currently cooked in jira/http2 branch). The changes of that branch are less than Star Burst effort and closer to be merged into master branch. Thanks! On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 3:55 PM jim ferenczi wrote: > Hi all, > I'd lik

Re: Welcome Nhat Nguyen as Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome Nhat! Another Vietnamese guy!! On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 6:12 AM Karl Wright wrote: > Welcome!! > Karl > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 4:42 PM Adrien Grand wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Please join me in welcoming Nhat Nguyen as the latest Lucene/Solr >> committer. >> Nhat, it's tradition for you to

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 7.3.1 RC2

a >> écrit : >> >> Even before I saw that comment, I was thinking poor Alan... >> >> >> >> - Mark >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 7:31 AM Alan Woodward >> wrote: >> >>> +1 >> >>> SUC

[VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 7.3.1 RC2

Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 7.3.1 The artifact can be downloaded from: *https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-7.3.1-RC2-revae0705edb59eaa567fe13ed3a222fdadc7153680/

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 7.3.1 RC1

; > > > > +1 > SUCCESS! [1:04:51.914445] > > On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 12:32 PM Michael McCandless < > luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > > +1 > > > > SUCCESS! [0:49:04.927108] > > > > Mike McCandless > > > > http://blog.mikemccandless.

[VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 7.3.1 RC1

Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 7.3.1 The artifacts can be downloaded from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-7.3.1-RC1-rev8fa7687413558b3bc65cbbbeb722a21314187e6a You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/sm

Re: BugFix release 7.3.1

eeperException$SessionExpiredException: > KeeperErrorCode = Session expired for /autoscaling.json > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 7:35 PM, Đạt Cao Mạnh > wrote: > >> Hi Varun, >> >> Go ahead, I will start the build tomorrow. >> >> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 1

Re: BugFix release 7.3.1

On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 1:01 AM, Alan Woodward > wrote: > >> Done >> >> > On 23 Apr 2018, at 04:12, Đạt Cao Mạnh wrote: >> > >> > Hi Alan, >> > >> > Can you backport LUCENE-8254 to branch_7_3? >> >> >> --

Re: BugFix release 7.3.1

Hi Alan, Can you backport LUCENE-8254 to branch_7_3?

BugFix release 7.3.1

Note: Resent another mail because the previous one missed 7.3.1 in the title. Hi, There are some bugs get fixed in 7.4 are SOLR-12066, SOLR-12087, and SOLR-12088 which can cause some annoying problems to users who are using autoscaling framework (or frequently calling DeleteReplica API). so I want

BugFix release

Hi, There are some bugs get fixed in 7.4 are SOLR-12066, SOLR-12087, and SOLR-12088 which can cause some annoying problems to users who are using autoscaling framework (or frequently calling DeleteReplica API). so I wanted to ask if anyone objects to a bugfix release for 7.3 (7.3.1). I also volunt

Re: Welcome to the PMC

Thanks, everyone!! On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 10:17 AM David Smiley wrote: > Welcome! > > On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 3:49 PM Adrien Grand wrote: > >> I am pleased to announce that Cao Mạnh Đạt has accepted the PMC's >> invitation to join. >> >> Welcome Đạt! >> > -- > Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Cons

Re: Welcome Cao Mạnh Đạt to the PMC

Thanks, everyone!! On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 5:44 AM Joel Bernstein wrote: > Welcome Dat! > > Joel Bernstein > http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ > > On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 6:42 PM, Tomas Fernandez Lobbe > wrote: > >> Welcome Đạt! >> >> >> On Apr 2, 2018, at 2:59 PM, Christian Moen wrote: >> >> Congr

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.3

Hi Alan, I committed the fix as well as resolve the issue. Thanks! On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 9:27 PM Alan Woodward wrote: > OK, thanks. Let me know when it’s in. > > > On 20 Mar 2018, at 14:07, Đạt Cao Mạnh wrote: > > Hi Alan, guys, > > I found a blocker issue

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.3

was going through the blockers for 7.3 and only SOLR-12070 came up. Is > the fix complete for this Andrzej? > > @Alan : When do you plan on cutting an RC ? I committed SOLR-12083 > yesterday and SOLR-12063 today to master/branch_7x. Both are important > fixes for CDCR so if you are okay I c

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.3

Hi guys, Alan I committed the fix for SOLR-12110 to branch_7_3 Thanks! On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 5:43 PM Đạt Cao Mạnh wrote: > Hi Alan, > > Sure the issue is marked as Blocker for 7.3. > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 3:12 PM Alan Woodward > wrote: > >> Thanks Đạt, co

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.3

Hi Alan, Sure the issue is marked as Blocker for 7.3. On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 3:12 PM Alan Woodward wrote: > Thanks Đạt, could you mark the issue as a Blocker and let me know when > it’s been resolved? > > On 16 Mar 2018, at 02:05, Đạt Cao Mạnh wrote: > > Hi guys, Alan, >

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.3

Hi guys, Alan, I found a blocker issue SOLR-12110, when investigating test failure. I've already uploaded a patch and beasting the tests, if the result is good I will commit soon. Thanks! On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 7:49 PM Alan Woodward wrote: > Just realised that I don’t have an ASF Jenkins acco

Re: Welcome Jason Gerlowski as committer

Welcome Jason! On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 5:33 PM Anshum Gupta wrote: > Welcome and congratulations Jason! Looking forward to working with you > (again) :) > > > On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 6:48 AM Varun Thacker wrote: > >> Welcome and congrats Jason! >> >> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:02 AM, David Smiley >

Re: Welcome Ignacio Vera as Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome Ignacio! On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 1:53 PM Christian Moen wrote: > Congrats! > > Best, > Christian > > On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 1:35 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Please join me in welcoming Ignacio Vera as the latest Lucene/Solr >> committer. >> Ignacio, it's tradition for you

Re: BugFix release 7.2.1

Hi all, I will work on SOLR-11771 today, It is a simple fix and will be great if it get fixed in 7.2.1 On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 11:23 PM Erick Erickson wrote: > Neither of those Solr fixes are earth shatteringly important, they've both > been aro

Re: Welcome Hrishikesh Gadre as Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome! On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 10:14 AM David Smiley wrote: > Welcome Hrishikesh! Well deserved. > ~ David > > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 1:23 PM Yonik Seeley wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> Please join me in welcoming Hrishikesh Gadre as the latest Lucene/Solr >> committer. >> Hrishikesh, it's trad

Re: Welcome Mike Drob as Lucene/Solr committer

Congrats Mike! On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:35 AM Dennis Gove wrote: > Welcome Mike! > > On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Mark Miller > wrote: > >> I'm pleased to announce that Mike Drob has accepted the PMC's >> invitation to become a committer. >> >> Mike, it's tradition that you introduce yoursel

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.5.1 RC1

Hi Joel, It's totally up to you to release this version or waiting for the fix. On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:46 PM Đạt Cao Mạnh wrote: > I spent today to fix Steve test failure for SOLR-10420. Can not reproduce > the failure with my machine, so I came up with 2 patches that I think can

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.5.1 RC1

this release tomorrow. We can continue with this >> > release and ship 6.5.1. In the background start working on 6.5.2. >> > >> > 2) Or we could respin 6.5.1 to include SOLR-10420. The problem with >> this is >> > it restarts the clock on the 6.5.1 and dela

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.5.1 RC1

lease and ship 6.5.1. In the background start working on 6.5.2. > > 2) Or we could respin 6.5.1 to include SOLR-10420. The problem with this > is it restarts the clock on the 6.5.1 and delays other bug fixes. > > Joel Bernstein > http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ > > On Wed, Apr

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.5.1 RC1

Sorry Joel, but can we wait for SOLR-10420, this is a serious bug that leaking one SolrZkClient per second on the Overseer node. On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 6:34 PM Tommaso Teofili wrote: > +1 > > SUCCESS! [2:25:09.313218] > > Tommaso > > Il giorno mar 11 apr 2017 alle ore 06:47 Shalin Shekhar Manga

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.5.0 RC1

Hi Alexandre, I think SOLR-8045 can be closed. On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 7:33 AM Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote: > Is SOLR-8045 (v2 API URLs) resolved in 6.5? Because it is listed as > reopened but also in the release notes as shipped. > > Regards, >Alex. > > > > http://www.solr-start.com/ -

Re: Welcome Toke Eskildsen as a Lucene/Solr committer

Congratulations and welcome Toke! On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 5:17 PM Tommaso Teofili wrote: > Congrats and welcome Toke! > > Regards, > Tommaso > > Il giorno gio 16 feb 2017 alle ore 10:00 Shalin Shekhar Mangar < > shalinman...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > Congratulations and welcome Toke! > > On Tu

Re: Welcome Cao Manh Dat as a Lucene/Solr committer

Thanks to everyone! I still can not believe this is true. Brief intro: I started out with Lucene since I was a student at university, by writing a Vietnamese Analyzer for Lucene. But I didn't realize how great is open source/ apache projects. After college, I joined Viettel and worked on building

Re: Write buffering updates to temporary files?

long... but I guess that ship has sailed. > > On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 5:52 PM Đạt Cao Mạnh > wrote: > > Currently, we write buffering logs to current tlog and not apply that > updates to index. Then we rely on replay log to apply that updates to > index. But at the same time

Write buffering updates to temporary files?

Currently, we write buffering logs to current tlog and not apply that updates to index. Then we rely on replay log to apply that updates to index. But at the same time there are some updates also write to current tlog and applied to the index. For example, during peersync, if new updates come to r

Re: 5.4.1 release

If we intend to release 5.4.1. Please look at this issue (submited a patch several weeks ago) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8459 On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 3:30 PM Adrien Grand wrote: > Sorry Erick for the confusion, it looks like things are good for 5.3.1 > indeed but I meant 5.3.2 ab

Re: Documenting Lucene Index Directory File Extensions

Hi Mike, You can use simpletextcodec and javadoc to get more knowledge about the Lucene index. On Aug 30, 2015 10:10 AM, "Mike Drob" wrote: > Is there a document somewhere describing the structure of a lucene index > directory? Like, at an implementation level, what do all of the extensions > mea

DocumentsWriterPerThread finishDocument bug?

Hi, currently I'm reading the way Lucene index document and I found this code and wondering that is it a bug? DocumentsWriterPerThread.finishDocument(Term delTerm) { deleteQueue.add(delTerm, deleteSlice); // A point deleteSlice.apply(pendingUpdates, numDocsInRAM); } In the scenario when DWP

Re: Query needsScores

le TermQuery that would load > norms and freqs even though it was not necessary. > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Đạt Cao Mạnh > wrote: > > Hi Uwe, > > But I think passing around needsScore flag from searcher, collector, > query, > > weight, scorer is not a neat sol

Re: Query needsScores

BooleanQuery). > > > > Uwe > > > > - > > Uwe Schindler > > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > > http://www.thetaphi.de > > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > > *From:* Đạt Cao Mạnh [mailto:caomanhdat...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Monday, June 29, 2015 12:0

Query needsScores

In Lucene search, i see the check if(needsScores) in many places. Can we devide current queries to Query (that compute score) and Filter (that not compute score) and remove needsScores flag? -- *Best regards,* *Cao Mạnh Đạt* *D.O.B : 31-07-1991Cell: (+84) 946.328.329E-mail: caomanhdat...@gm

Re: VOTE: RC0 release apache-solr-ref-guide-5.2.pdf

+1 for this reference. On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 3:31 AM, Steve Rowe wrote: > +1 > > Steve > > > On Jun 3, 2015, at 1:30 PM, Chris Hostetter > wrote: > > > > > > Please VOTE to release these files as the Solr Ref Guide 5.2... > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/solr/ref-guide/a