(Gentle reminder) If you get some time, please have a look on this.
Hi, guys.
Why is it OK for the QueryParser to omit escaped special chars? Or isn't it?
What I'm trying to say is that the escaped char is replaced with whitespace
instead of being literally passed.
I try to understand why this happens. Is it because of the Analyzer or
because of the Parser?
Here
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Iulius Curt updated LUCENE-3970:
Fix Version/s: 4.0
> Rename getUnique[Field/Terms]Count() into s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Iulius Curt updated LUCENE-3970:
Attachment: LUCENE-3970.patch
> Rename getUnique[Field/Terms]Count() into s
/index
Reporter: Iulius Curt
Priority: Minor
Like Robert Muir said in LUCENE-3109:
{quote}Also I think there are other improvements we can do here that would be
more natural:
Fields.getUniqueFieldCount() -> Fields.size()
Terms.getUniqueTermCount() -> Terms.size(){qu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Iulius Curt updated LUCENE-3109:
Attachment: LUCENE-3109.patch
bq. Should we change AtomicReader to have invertedField() instead
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Iulius Curt updated LUCENE-3109:
Attachment: LUCENE-3109.patch
bq. In general I prefer seeing each import (not the wildcard
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Iulius Curt updated LUCENE-3109:
Attachment: LUCENE-3109.patch
It was cleaner to redo it from scratch. Hope didn't miss any
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13249237#comment-13249237
]
Iulius Curt commented on LUCENE-3109:
-
Good question. It seems I didn'
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Iulius Curt updated LUCENE-3958:
Attachment: LUCENE-3958.patch
Added a patch that solves "the this" problem and a few o
Affects Versions: 3.5, 4.0
Reporter: Iulius Curt
Priority: Trivial
Fix For: 4.0, 3.5
Linguistic corrections to the javadoc of {{forceMerge()}} in
{{org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter}}.
Main problem in "In general, once *the this* completes, the total
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13241776#comment-13241776
]
Iulius Curt commented on LUCENE-2357:
-
Could I have some of your time for a few
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Iulius Curt updated LUCENE-3815:
Attachment: LUCENE-3815.patch
> Correct copy-paste victim Comm
Reporter: Iulius Curt
Priority: Trivial
Fix For: 4.0
Correct the doc-comment of FieldsProducer (being a copy-paste victim of
FieldsConsumer).
"consumes" replaced with "produces".
One word change to avoid confusion: safe to commit.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Iulius Curt updated LUCENE-3109:
Attachment: LUCENE-3109.patch
Repaired a foolish mistake.
Also limited to the classes sepcified
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Iulius Curt updated LUCENE-3109:
Attachment: LUCENE-3109.patch
Attached a patch with the refactoring of Fields, FieldsProducer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13209305#comment-13209305
]
Iulius Curt commented on LUCENE-3109:
-
Is this still valid? (It looks like a
17 matches
Mail list logo