Any way to make it skip tests?
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Tommaso Teofili
tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote:
'ant run-maven-build' should do the trick.
Tommaso
2012/10/29 Jason Rutherglen jason.rutherg...@gmail.com
I have used 'ant generate-maven-artifacts' to generate the Maven
with keys, but it's
kind of ugly.
Please check the fst header though -- I'm not sure, maybe Mike wrote
it so that the node count/ keys count is in there.
Dawid
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Jason Rutherglen
jason.rutherg...@gmail.com wrote:
Sounds like I should just count
, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Jason Rutherglen
jason.rutherg...@gmail.com wrote:
I looked at the sources and didn't see a key count.
Thanks Dawid and Mike.
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 6:37 AM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
I believe node and arc count are stored, but not key
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Jason Rutherglen
jason.rutherg...@gmail.com wrote:
The FST class has a number of methods that return counts, which one
returns
the total number of keys that have been encoded into the FST
Bill, which patch is working for you? It is difficult to follow! :)
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 1:02 AM, William Bell billnb...@gmail.com wrote:
I am not sure what the issue is.
This is working for me...
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Jason Rutherglen (JIRA) j...@apache.org
wrote
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13291803#comment-13291803
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on SOLR-2242:
Terrance, can you post a patch to the Jira
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen resolved SOLR-2569.
Resolution: Won't Fix
Enable facile moving of cores
Thanks Mike.
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
Yes, in trunk: FSDirectory.setMaxMergeWriteMBPerSec.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Jason Rutherglen
jason.rutherg...@gmail.com wrote:
Has
I am getting the following error when running 'ant generate-maven-artifacts':
Buildfile: /Users/jasonrutherglen/src/LUCENE-TRUNK/build.xml
generate-maven-artifacts:
filter-pom-templates:
[copy] Copying 42 files to
/Users/jasonrutherglen/src/LUCENE-TRUNK/lucene/build/poms
-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Jason Rutherglen [mailto:jason.rutherg...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 3:58 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Error when running 'ant generate-maven-artifacts'
I am getting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13240498#comment-13240498
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on SOLR-2698:
+1 This'd be useful
This link seems to not work:
https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Maven-trunk/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/maven_artifacts
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
/NightlyBuilds,
dev-tools/maven/README.maven in your local working copy, and
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3825.
Stevev
-Original Message-
From: Jason Rutherglen [mailto:jason.rutherg...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 10:46 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13225788#comment-13225788
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on SOLR-3221:
+1 Long overdue.
Make
.
Martijn
On 7 March 2012 07:03, Jason Rutherglen jason.rutherg...@gmail.com wrote:
Are there plans to add the ability to apply functions (eg, sum,
average, distinct, or custom functions) to group'd documents. Such
that the document list per group is not returned, instead the result
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13211467#comment-13211467
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on SOLR-3141:
-1 Serious over/under-engineering
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3759?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13203118#comment-13203118
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-3759:
--
+1 Nice, distributed join
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3734?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13197074#comment-13197074
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-3734:
--
The issues mentioned were brought up
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3602?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13189375#comment-13189375
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-3602:
--
I was reviewing this issue to use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3602?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13189501#comment-13189501
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-3602:
--
{quote}The terms collected
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3602?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13189509#comment-13189509
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-3602:
--
Just following up on the per-segment
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13188549#comment-13188549
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on SOLR-3044:
+1 NamedList is an oldie, not not a goodie
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13177885#comment-13177885
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on SOLR-2702:
This issue [only] needs to add
SolrJ commit still has the flush parameter, it should be removed, and
softcommit should be added.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13173853#comment-13173853
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-3654:
--
+1 There are 3 other MAJOR Apache
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13171716#comment-13171716
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-3654:
--
Nice, I mentioned this on the dev
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3602?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13167959#comment-13167959
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-3602:
--
Maybe we can (in another issue) move
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13166305#comment-13166305
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-3622:
--
+! To the function naming being
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3602?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13159335#comment-13159335
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-3602:
--
Great to see this moving out of Solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3587?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13156300#comment-13156300
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-3587:
--
+1 on the patch. Javadoc external
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2889?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13148003#comment-13148003
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on SOLR-2889:
+1 - Put it in Lucene and NOT Solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2889?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13148065#comment-13148065
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on SOLR-2889:
Yonik, Take a step back. No analyzers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2889?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13148269#comment-13148269
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on SOLR-2889:
Simon and Yonik, re-read what you wrote
...benchmarks show it as being 2x more CPU-efficient than the
equivalent pure-Java implementation...
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7761
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2849?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13134357#comment-13134357
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on SOLR-2849:
{quote}As an aside, it's unfortunate
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-3498:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-3498.patch
Added support for attaching the new Lucene
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13123695#comment-13123695
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-3498:
--
Also, the patch is against 3.x
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13123697#comment-13123697
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-3498:
--
The current Solr IndexReaderFactory
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen resolved LUCENE-3493.
--
Resolution: Unresolved
LUCENE-3498 supercedes this issue as a 100% workable solution
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-3498:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-3498.patch
Added a new [backwards compatibility
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-3498:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-3498.patch
Removed SolrIndexReaderFactory, instead SolrCoreAware
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1536?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13122858#comment-13122858
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1536:
--
+1
if a filter can
: core/index
Affects Versions: 3.4, 4.0
Reporter: Jason Rutherglen
Priority: Blocker
DirectoryReader has protected methods that are overridden and made final. This
is silly because it prevents other classes from overriding DirectoryReader.
The methods
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-3497:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-3497.patch
The patch makes most of what is private in DR protected
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13123102#comment-13123102
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-3497:
--
I'll open another issue
, 4.0
Reporter: Jason Rutherglen
Priority: Minor
An IndexReaderFactory can be used by IndexWriter and DirectoryReader to enable
subclasses of DR to be instantiated by Lucene, automatically.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-3498:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-3498.patch
Here's a first cut and all tests pass
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13123232#comment-13123232
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-3498:
--
I think the Solr one could be made
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13123250#comment-13123250
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-3498:
--
Simon, I think you'd be surprised
Affects Versions: 3.4
Reporter: Jason Rutherglen
Priority: Blocker
When a custom index reader is used with Solr and reopen, the custom reader
vanishes after the reopen. It's a bug.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-3493:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-3493.patch
Patch with unit test demonstrating the bug.
The fix
PagedBytes is great! Even better would be a couple of additional
methods, one to write it out to an IndexOutput and the other for the
total bytes used.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional
I try not to without having a patch somewhat prepared!
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Simon Willnauer
simon.willna...@googlemail.com wrote:
why don't you open an issue for this?
thanks,
simon
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Jason Rutherglen
jason.rutherg...@gmail.com wrote:
PagedBytes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13122019#comment-13122019
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-3493:
--
The patch shows the bug only. Which
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13122033#comment-13122033
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-3493:
--
Uwe, I'd like to agree with you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13122050#comment-13122050
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-3493:
--
bq. Solr's NRT does not rely
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13122089#comment-13122089
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-3493:
--
Uwe, I tried your idea. It doesn't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13122095#comment-13122095
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-3493:
--
One way to solve all of this without
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13122506#comment-13122506
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-3493:
--
Uwe, check this out on the 3.3
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13120941#comment-13120941
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-3488:
--
Great! Next step is integrating
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13120984#comment-13120984
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-3488:
--
bq. has been around for 7 years
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13121350#comment-13121350
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-3488:
--
Atrocious or perhaps horrible
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13121369#comment-13121369
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-3488:
--
bq. manager classes leaner
Leaner
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13121381#comment-13121381
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-3488:
--
bq. Ok. lets got back to this code
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13121556#comment-13121556
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-3488:
--
bq. Arn't you used to pushback
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2809?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13120187#comment-13120187
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on SOLR-2809:
In RT the searchers are cheap
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2595?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13120189#comment-13120189
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on SOLR-2595:
How will splitting occur on an index
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2809?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13120211#comment-13120211
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on SOLR-2809:
{quote}
if we support distributed stats
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2809?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13120217#comment-13120217
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on SOLR-2809:
{quote}no need to modify any of the guts
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2809?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13120223#comment-13120223
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on SOLR-2809:
SOLR-2778 is the issue that seeks to clean
Will the bulk postings only help PFOR?
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
...And flexible stored fields + TV, so the file format is complete flexible.
Uwe
--
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, 28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
Jason Rutherglen
I asked this a little while ago, and figured I'd ask again. It seemed
like the important remaining issue was the bulk postings iterator? Is
that still true? Thanks!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13109599#comment-13109599
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-3441:
--
It would be great if the cost of (re
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2778?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13108316#comment-13108316
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on SOLR-2778:
Sweet-ness.com!
Revise distributed code
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13105474#comment-13105474
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on SOLR-2066:
+1 on Concepts that can also be used
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13104079#comment-13104079
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-3433:
--
This is somewhat funny, as it seems
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13104165#comment-13104165
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-3433:
--
Here's another thread discussing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13101391#comment-13101391
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2312:
--
There are many important use cases
The delete by query is solved by recording the primary / UID of the
document(s) deleted. It's only expensive if the transaction log
implementation is not designed properly. :)
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 5:35 AM, Simon Willnauer
simon.willna...@googlemail.com wrote:
hey folks,
we already have
This isn't a new problem. Databases have been around for what, 30+ years?
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Simon Willnauer
simon.willna...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Jason Rutherglen
jason.rutherg...@gmail.com wrote:
The delete by query is solved by recording
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13099138#comment-13099138
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on SOLR-2700:
I'm not sure how this feature makes any
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13099239#comment-13099239
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on SOLR-2700:
This is going to best be amazing, I wonder
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13099722#comment-13099722
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on SOLR-2748:
Seeing all of the bugs related to the Solr
I was browsing code, and noticed DirectoryReader is package protected.
Why is this? Ie, SegmentReader is not.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13097246#comment-13097246
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-3199:
--
I started integrating the patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13097257#comment-13097257
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-3199:
--
Ok, solved the above comment
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-3199:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-3199.patch
This is a minor update when compared with the last patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13096108#comment-13096108
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-3199:
--
Simon,
In summary this is using
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13096231#comment-13096231
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-3199:
--
Simon, I think your patch should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13095412#comment-13095412
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2312:
--
I'll post a new patch shortly
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-2312:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: Realtime Branch)
Affects Version/s: (was: Realtime
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-3199:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-3199.patch
Here's a version of this issue. Added are a couple
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-2312:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-2312.patch
Here's a new patch that incrementally adds field cache
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-2312:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-2312.patch
This is a revised version of the LUCENE-2312 patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13090722#comment-13090722
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on SOLR-2700:
Typically a transaction log configured
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13090764#comment-13090764
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2312:
--
A benchmark plan is, compare
(perDocValues method) so the RT reader
Ok, it's not clear when / how DVs are used instead of field caches,
and why their access isn't merged together?
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Jason Rutherglen
: 4.0
Reporter: Jason Rutherglen
Priority: Minor
For LUCENE-2312 we need to be able to synchronously replace field cache values
and receive events on when new field cache values are created.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-3399:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-3399.patch
A cut of this.
Enable replace-able field caches
LUCENE-2312 needs appendable field caches. I can include this
functionality into LUCENE-2312, or separate it out into a separate
issue / patch.
However it would only be useful for RT / LUCENE-2312. Also, I'm not
sure how this functionality relates to doc values. If we used doc
values, then we
1 - 100 of 1725 matches
Mail list logo
