[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13166305#comment-13166305 ]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-3622: ------------------------------------------ +! To the function naming being completely off. That's the naming that should change. > separate IndexDocValues interface from implementation > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-3622 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3622 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Robert Muir > Attachments: LUCENE-3622.patch > > > Currently the o.a.l.index.values contains both the abstract apis and > Lucene40's current implementation. > I think we should move the implementation underneath Lucene40Codec, leaving > only the abstract apis. > For example, simpletext might have a different implementation, and we might > make a int8 implementation > underneath preflexcodec to support norms. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org