[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2856?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12980436#action_12980436
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2856:
--
bq. A CompositeSegmentListener
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12980533#action_12980533
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2793:
--
Ok, lets remove bufferSize.
bq.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12980546#action_12980546
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2793:
--
bq. The directory is the factory for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12980555#action_12980555
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2793:
--
In the patch the bufferSize is an int
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2856?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12980565#action_12980565
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2856:
--
bq. We could go with a -1 setting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12979625#action_12979625
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
bq. Any segs already flushed remain
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12979631#action_12979631
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2312:
--
{quote}Is that right that future RT
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12979646#action_12979646
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2312:
--
{quote}The one exception to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12979655#action_12979655
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
bq. Lost in abbreviations - Can you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2474?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12979720#action_12979720
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2474:
--
{quote}make this a static method, eg
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12979728#action_12979728
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2793:
--
Shall I take this one? With the plan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12979736#action_12979736
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2793:
--
{quote}this issue only adds the
Create IndexWriter event listener, specifically for merges
--
Key: LUCENE-2856
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2856
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12979740#action_12979740
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2793:
--
bq. Basically the IOContext needs to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12979382#action_12979382
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
bq. Once flush is triggered, the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12979395#action_12979395
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2186:
--
Out of curiosity, re: LUCENE-2312,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12979407#action_12979407
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2186:
--
bq. we are very close - to land on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12979138#action_12979138
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
{quote}So all that's guaranteed after
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12979139#action_12979139
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
Also, don't we need the global lock
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12979149#action_12979149
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
{quote}As soon as a DWPT is pulled
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12979162#action_12979162
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
And there's the case of the thread
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12979229#action_12979229
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
{quote}the flush the world case? (Ie
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12979243#action_12979243
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
To further clarify, we also no longer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12979252#action_12979252
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
{quote}I think segment 1 shouldn't be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-2324:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-2324-SMALL.patch
I added a FlushPolicy class, deletes record the ram
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12978504#action_12978504
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
{quote}actually what should be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12978516#action_12978516
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
When we're OOMing the ram used
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-2324:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-2324-SMALL.patch
RAM accounting is slightly improved, we had two
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12977833#action_12977833
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
Perhaps it's best to place the RAM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12977892#action_12977892
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
Another model we could implement is a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12978065#action_12978065
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
We're going to great lengths it seems
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12978075#action_12978075
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
{quote}I believe we can drop the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-2324:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-2324-SMALL.patch
Same as the last patch, however default deletes is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-2324:
-
Attachment: test.out
Here's a new test.out, I'll look at TestCheckIndex which should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12977443#action_12977443
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
Looks like the problem with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12977465#action_12977465
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
Also I think the deadlock is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-2324:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-2324-SMALL.patch
I added an assertion showing the lack of DWPTs when
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12977560#action_12977560
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
Taking a step back, I'm not sure
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12977585#action_12977585
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
I think we can get DWPTs working sans
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2841?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12976341#action_12976341
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2841:
--
bq. you still aren't ever removing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12974224#action_12974224
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on SOLR-2290:
I think it'll require creating a new
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12974247#action_12974247
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2312:
--
bq. Obtaining a normal fieldcache
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12974264#action_12974264
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2312:
--
bq. DocValues == column stride fields
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12974484#action_12974484
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
Also, it'd be great if we could
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-2324:
-
Attachment: test.out
Here's ant test-core output. Looks like it's deadlocking in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-2324:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-2324-SMALL.patch
Small patch fixing the num deletes test null
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12973696#action_12973696
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2312:
--
bq. how will we incrementally update
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12973732#action_12973732
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2312:
--
bq. Maybe we add a supportsOrd() to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12973734#action_12973734
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
As per Michael B's email, I'll start
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-2312:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-2312-FC.patch
Simple patch that's added a new CachedArray setValue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12973396#action_12973396
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2312:
--
For TermOrdValComparator we'll have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12973024#action_12973024
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2312:
--
I think this can be implemented on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12973025#action_12973025
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2814:
--
bq. And I think we should backport
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-2575:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-2575.patch
The same as the last patch updated to trunk.
Concurrent
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12973060#action_12973060
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2312:
--
I thought about opening a separate
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12973092#action_12973092
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2312:
--
After further thought, there really
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-2575:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-2575.patch
A few things in BBP needed to be public.
Concurrent
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12972847#action_12972847
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on SOLR-2290:
Tom, I think this can be generified to use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12972850#action_12972850
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2814:
--
bq. backporting to 3.x...
Out of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12972855#action_12972855
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2500:
--
DirectIOLinuxDirectory is in trunk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12972531#action_12972531
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2814:
--
bq. I think we've got DWPT down to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12970530#action_12970530
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2793:
--
Perhaps we can add the ability to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12970251#action_12970251
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2792:
--
{quote}Just an idea, maybe you could
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12970262#action_12970262
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
Michael,
I don't have commit access
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12970341#action_12970341
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
bq. The merge is rather hard, as you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12969799#action_12969799
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2680:
--
The patch applied.
Ok, a likely
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12969822#action_12969822
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2680:
--
All tests pass.
Improve how
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12969836#action_12969836
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
Now that LUCENE-2680 is implemented
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen resolved LUCENE-2655.
--
Resolution: Won't Fix
Per-segment deletes were implemented as a part of LUCENE-2680.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12969856#action_12969856
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
and then merge realtime back into
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12969504#action_12969504
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2680:
--
When patching there are errors on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-2680:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-2680.patch
This patch separates out most of the deletes storage and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-2680:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-2680.patch
Now we're returning the DocumentsWriterThreadState to IW
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965468#action_12965468
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2680:
--
Here's a random guess, I think
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12964938#action_12964938
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2680:
--
bq. The waitReady(null) is there so
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12964606#action_12964606
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2680:
--
I guess you think the sync on doc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12964610#action_12964610
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2680:
--
I started on taking the approach of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-2680:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-2680.patch
* I added pushDeletesLastSegment to doc writer
* Deletes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-2680:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-2680.patch
In trying to implement the per-segment deletes I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12934381#action_12934381
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2680:
--
Running TestStressIndexing2 500 times
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12934384#action_12934384
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2680:
--
The above isn't on trunk, I misread
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12934388#action_12934388
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2680:
--
I've isolated the mismatch in num
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12934390#action_12934390
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2680:
--
A test to see if the problem is the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12934058#action_12934058
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2680:
--
I'm seeing the following error which
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12932988#action_12932988
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2680:
--
{quote}Why do we still have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12933070#action_12933070
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2762:
--
{quote}I think we should improve our
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12933182#action_12933182
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2680:
--
Additionally we need to decide how
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12933305#action_12933305
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2680:
--
Flush deletes equals true means that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12933306#action_12933306
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2680:
--
We can upgrade to an int[] from an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12932508#action_12932508
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2680:
--
Straight indexing and deleting will
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12932599#action_12932599
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2755:
--
bq. large merge can easily kill your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12932182#action_12932182
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2755:
--
A good feature for Solr could be the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=1293#action_1293
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2680:
--
Now that the intermittent failures
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2759?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12931904#action_12931904
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2759:
--
RT's usage of doc stores, ie, reading
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2759?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12931939#action_12931939
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2759:
--
bq. Actually I think Michael I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12931103#action_12931103
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2118:
--
Ah, I saw this error from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12931143#action_12931143
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2680:
--
Ah, nice, I should have looked for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12930658#action_12930658
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2680:
--
I think I've taken LUCENE-2680 as far
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12930845#action_12930845
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2680:
--
I think I've isolated this test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12930949#action_12930949
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2680:
--
Alright, we needed to clone the
201 - 300 of 1294 matches
Mail list logo