+1 for Confluence...
Peter Mateja
peter.mat...@gmail.com
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Michael Herndon wrote:
> If we're allowed to install plugins for moinmoin...
> http://moinmo.in/parser/csharp.py
>
> I'm guessing the syntax would be similar to the python high
hat I've blathered on about here has probably already been discussed,
but I wanted to get some discussion going. Thoughts?
Peter Mateja
peter.mat...@gmail.com
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Digy wrote:
> Having a "buildable" & "clean" code is just a beginning
should be refactored to use an
appropriate standard exception type (perhaps FormatException, though I'm not
sure this is appropriate) or create an internal Exception class for this
case.
There's plenty more build issues... I need to put this down for the rest of
the day, so I thought I'd
s, but I'm good
with the content.
Peter Mateja
peter.mat...@gmail.com
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Troy Howard wrote:
> All,
>
> Thanks for all the recent activity in the mailing lists. I'm really
> eager to get this project moving forward and the discussions going o
I'd like to be listed as a Contributor as well. I don't think I'll be able
to devote the resources required to be a Commiter at this time, but I
definitely have an interest in the viability and growth of this port.
My name is Peter Mateja. I currently work at Sonic Foundry, I
er context (AppDomain, etc.)
Let's ensure that Lucene.Net users know the how and why for each approach.
Peter Mateja
peter.mat...@gmail.com
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Karell Ste-Marie
wrote:
> Robert,
>
> Thanks for stepping in,
>
> I personally found some of your sug
You are correct...
http://www.jetbrains.com/resharper/buy/buy.jsp#openSource
Just needs to be applied for. I can dig into this a bit further.
Peter Mateja
peter.mat...@gmail.com
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Ayende Rahien wrote:
> JetBrains routinely give away licenses for OSS
>
e a professional .Net
developer it makes life much easier!
Also, I 2nd the Krzysztof book. Excellent reading. I'll dig it out and
give it another scan.
Peter Mateja
peter.mat...@gmail.com
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Troy Howard wrote:
> I agree with the suggestion to follow t
It looks like you're going to have to build from source:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/lucene.net/tags/Lucene.Net_2_9_2/
Peter Mateja
peter.mat...@gmail.com
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 4:22 AM, Abhilash C R (JIRA) wrote:
>
>[
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse
in VS
2008+, so if we continue to maintain VS 2005 compatibility, we wouldn't be
able to make use of T4.
Allright... I'll shut up now. :)
Peter Mateja
peter.mat...@gmail.com
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Peter Mateja wrote:
> Just a quick follow up on my IDisposable example.
additional functionality by overriding the Dispose(bool) protected
method.
Peter Mateja
peter.mat...@gmail.com
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Peter Mateja wrote:
> I think extension methods will be a great tool to supplement functionality
> onto existing Lucene.Net base classes. However, in so
posed=true;
}
#endregion
}
Peter Mateja
peter.mat...@gmail.com
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Alex Thompson wrote:
> I think a better pattern than partial classes would be extension methods
> (like the way LINQ works with IEnumerable). That way the extensions could
>
and fire them off if you wish in order to start a
discussion.
Peter Mateja
peter.mat...@gmail.com
n some of the core
classes in Lucene.Net into partial classes, allowing additional additional
class tooling outside of the Lucene.Net core project. This is perhaps a
naive suggestion, so if anyone has already considered this route, let me
know.
Peter Mateja
peter.mat...@gmail.com
On Thu, Nov
14 matches
Mail list logo
