a new branch for
.Net friendly
Lucene.Net
or
continuing on this branch is just a
matter of taste.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Scott Lombard
[mailto:lombardena...@gmail.com
I don't see the g branch differing all that much from the line-by-line port.
All the g branch does is change some data types as generics, but line by
line the code the same once the generics are declared.
I don't see 2.9.4g being any closer to a .NET style version than 2.9.4.
While it does
The Anonymous class issue is a readability issue not a functional change.
So the release could go forward without it. The work should be continued in
the 3.0.3 version.
Prescott are you planning on merging the 2.9.4g into the trunk then 3.0.3?
Scott
-Original Message-
From:
a tool that did it on a file per file basis
(instead of project level like Sharpen), for easy review and testing.
Thanks,
Christopher
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Scott Lombard
lombardena...@gmail.com
wrote:
Chris,
Now that you have spent some time dealing
Chris,
Now that you have spent some time dealing with the porting what is your view
on creating a fully automated porting tool?
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Currens [mailto:currens.ch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 5:23 PM
To:
: [Lucene.Net] Asking about Lucene.net License
I think he was asking if any of the code within Lucene.Net is GPL.
From: Scott Lombard lombardena...@gmail.com
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2011 5:08 PM
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net
Asha,
Lucene.net is an Apache Incubator project and is only distributed under an
Apache License version 2. If you are using a GPL 3 License then there is
documented compatibility between the licenses as described on the page
http://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html. Give this
Components: Lucene.Net Core
Affects Versions: Lucene.Net 2.9.4g
Reporter: Scott Lombard
Assignee: Scott Lombard
Fix For: Lucene.Net 2.9.4g
Replace Anonymous classes inhereted from JLCA which make the code
impossible to read.
Follow Digy's template to replace
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Work on LUCENENET-434 started by Scott Lombard.
Remove Anonymous classes to increase readablity
.
- Neal
-Original Message-
From: Scott Lombard
[mailto:lombardenator@gmail.**comlombardena...@gmail.com
]
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 1:58 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.**org
lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
;
lucene-net-user
, if it is not a
line-by-line port. It ceases to be Lucene.
- Neal
-Original Message-
From: Scott Lombard
[mailto:lombardenator@gmail.**comlombardena...@gmail.com
]
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 1:58 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.**org
lucene-net
.
- Neal
-Original Message-
From: Scott Lombard [mailto:lombardena...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 1:58 PM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
After
I copied last month's report and updated it. Please review my changes and
revise as necessary.
Thanks
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 8:31 AM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [Lucene.Net] Board
Itamar,
The best way to have changes incorporated in to the trunk is to create JIRA
issues. You will find the Lucene.Net JIRA at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Itamar Syn-Hershko [mailto:ita...@code972.com]
Sent: Monday, March 28,
I sent an email to the db4o team to see what they think. When I get a
response back from them we should have more answers. At that point it
will either be a no on their end or we will have specific items to
discuss.
Scott
On Friday, March 25, 2011, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13010857#comment-13010857
]
Scott Lombard commented on LUCENENET-380:
-
My point when starting
We have been discussing under
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-380 the possibility of
bringing Sharpen into our repo under a db4o Opensource Compatibility License
(dOCL) license. Here are the basics of what we have been discussing.
Versant allows db4o products to be licensed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13010051#comment-13010051
]
Scott Lombard commented on LUCENENET-380:
-
Why fork outside of ASF if we can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13009726#comment-13009726
]
Scott Lombard commented on LUCENENET-380:
-
I was investigating what license
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Lombard updated LUCENENET-399:
Remaining Estimate: 20h (was: 20m)
Port changes from Java Lucene 2.9.3 and 2.9.4
: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 5:41 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Procedure for Commiting
On 2011-03-14, Scott Lombard wrote:
I wanted to get a final agreement on how we want to handle commits
I wanted to get a final agreement on how we want to handle commits to the
repository. There have been discussions in a couple of different threads
about this topic. I know patches, branches and just go for it has been
discussed and different people have different ideas. I just wanted to know
+1
Scott
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On 2011-02-28, Troy Howard wrote:
One quick concern I have, is how much of the things listed are already
available on the Apache hudson server?
builds@apache is the place to ask.
A lot of this is .NET
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Lombard updated LUCENENET-399:
Remaining Estimate: 40h (was: 0h)
Port changes from Java Lucene 2.9.3 and 2.9.4
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-394?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Lombard updated LUCENENET-394:
Priority: Minor (was: Blocker)
AnonymousClassScoreDocComparator throws
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-394?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Lombard resolved LUCENENET-394.
-
Resolution: Won't Fix
Assignee: Scott Lombard
I changed the priority
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Lombard updated LUCENENET-172:
Component/s: Lucene.Net Core
Priority: Minor (was: Major
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-378?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Lombard updated LUCENENET-378:
Component/s: Lucene.Net Test
Lucene.Net Demo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Lombard updated LUCENENET-167:
Priority: Trivial (was: Major)
Affects Version/s: .NET API
Fix
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Lombard updated LUCENENET-172:
Affects Version/s: (was: .NET API)
Lucene.Net 2.3.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Lombard updated LUCENENET-167:
Component/s: Lucene.Net Test
Lucene.Net Core
Affects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Lombard updated LUCENENET-380:
Component/s: Lucene.Net Test
Lucene.Net Demo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-372?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Lombard updated LUCENENET-372:
Component/s: Lucene.Net Contrib
Labels: Analyzers (was: )
NLS pack
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Lombard updated LUCENENET-379:
Component/s: Project Infrastructure
Due Date: 28/Feb/11 (was: 31
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Lombard updated LUCENENET-379:
Remaining Estimate: 80h (was: 336h)
Original Estimate: 80h (was: 336h)
Clean up
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Lombard updated LUCENENET-377:
Component/s: Lucene.Net Core
Affects Version/s: .NET API
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Lombard closed LUCENENET-393.
---
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
Assignee: Scott Lombard
This is more of a question
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Lombard updated LUCENENET-391:
Component/s: Lucene.Net Contrib
Description: .net port of Luke.Net
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12996708#comment-12996708
]
Scott Lombard commented on LUCENENET-391:
-
Public fork of Luke.Net on bitbucket
: Scott Lombard
Prepare source to be imported in the Lucene.Net respository
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Lombard updated LUCENENET-398:
Assignee: Sergey Mirvoda
Prepare the code for ingestion
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Lombard updated LUCENENET-389:
Component/s: Lucene.Net Core
Due Date: 28/Feb/11
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12996239#comment-12996239
]
Scott Lombard commented on LUCENENET-379:
-
I like the idea of the a new logo
43 matches
Mail list logo
