Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-21 Thread Varun Thacker
There are a couple of more 404 cases caused by missing png files namely: /images/home-wrapper.png , /images/footer.png from http://lucene.apache.org/core/ and /images/quote.jpg from http://lucene.apache.org/solr/ I'm not sure on this but because of the missing footer.png this might me happening

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-07 Thread Paul Doscher
Feb 2012 18:46:08 -0500 To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] New Website We are now live! http://lucene.apache.org/ On Feb 2, 2012, at 6:12 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: I increased the font size and made it darker. I also updated the tutorial. Time for me to do other things until

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-07 Thread Simon Willnauer
...@lucidimagination.com www.lucidimagination.com From: Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org Reply-To: dev@lucene.apache.org Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 18:46:08 -0500 To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] New Website We are now live! http://lucene.apache.org/ On Feb 2, 2012, at 6:12 PM

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-07 Thread Michael McCandless
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 4:35 AM, Simon Willnauer simon.willna...@googlemail.com wrote: thanks for all the work grant! +1, thanks Grant! Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-07 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Feb 7, 2012, at 2:11 AM, David Smiley (@MITRE.org) wrote: Grant; did you miss my JIRA issue to add the book info? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3096 I missed that. Feel free to fix once you get your account, as my week is booked solid and the amount of time I have for

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-07 Thread Mark Miller
Hmm...just noticed that the first hit when you google lucene is http://lucene.apache.org/java/ But that no longer points anywhere... (404). Perhaps we should try and plug in a redirect or something? - Mark Miller lucidimagination.com

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-07 Thread Grant Ingersoll
Ugh, where did our redirect go? On Feb 7, 2012, at 8:57 AM, Mark Miller wrote: Hmm...just noticed that the first hit when you google lucene is http://lucene.apache.org/java/ But that no longer points anywhere... (404). Perhaps we should try and plug in a redirect or something? - Mark

RE: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-07 Thread Steven A Rowe
? When I follow the link, the redirect works for me (- core/ I mean) From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:gsing...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 11:58 AM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] New Website Ugh, where did our redirect go? On Feb 7, 2012, at 8:57 AM, Mark Miller

RE: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-07 Thread Steven A Rowe
Oh, it only works with a trailing slash – without it, I get a 404 From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:gsing...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 11:58 AM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] New Website Ugh, where did our redirect go? On Feb 7, 2012, at 8:57 AM, Mark Miller

RE: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-07 Thread Uwe Schindler
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] New Website ? When I follow the link, the redirect works for me (- core/ I mean) From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:gsing...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 11:58 AM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] New Website Ugh, where did our redirect go

RE: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-07 Thread Uwe Schindler
: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 6:00 PM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] New Website Oh, it only works with a trailing slash – without it, I get a 404 From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:gsing...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 11:58 AM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re

RE: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-07 Thread Chris Hostetter
: I get 404 in both cases (with and without trailing slash). There are also links with /java/index.html this should be fixed .. the redirect to deal with the versioned docs broke the simple case of just /java -Hoss - To

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-06 Thread Grant Ingersoll
FYI: Forrest to Markdown: http://forrest.apache.org/pluginDocs/plugins_0_80/org.apache.forrest.plugin.output.Markdown/ -Grant On Feb 2, 2012, at 6:12 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: I increased the font size and made it darker. I also updated the tutorial. Time for me to do other things until

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-06 Thread Grant Ingersoll
We are now live! http://lucene.apache.org/ On Feb 2, 2012, at 6:12 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: I increased the font size and made it darker. I also updated the tutorial. Time for me to do other things until this weekend when I'm going to cut over, so if you have stuff you don't like

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-06 Thread Chris Hostetter
: We are now live! : : http://lucene.apache.org/ FYI: Grant had put in a redirect for dealing with the /java/ - /core/ directory change, but forgot that a bunch of page names and urls had changed slightly as well. as you have probably noticed based on all the commits, i scrambled to try and

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-06 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Feb 6, 2012, at 7:51 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: : We are now live! : : http://lucene.apache.org/ FYI: Grant had put in a redirect for dealing with the /java/ - /core/ directory change, but forgot that a bunch of page names and urls had changed slightly as well. as you have

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-06 Thread Joe Cabrera
On 02/06/2012 07:37 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: On Feb 6, 2012, at 7:51 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: : We are now live! : : http://lucene.apache.org/ FYI: Grant had put in a redirect for dealing with the /java/ - /core/ directory change, but forgot that a bunch of page names and urls had

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-06 Thread David Smiley (@MITRE.org)
Grant; did you miss my JIRA issue to add the book info? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3096 ~ David - Author: http://www.packtpub.com/apache-solr-3-enterprise-search-server/book -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-New-Website

RE: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-06 Thread Uwe Schindler
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:gsing...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 2:37 AM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] New Website On Feb 6, 2012, at 7:51 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: : We are now live! : : http://lucene.apache.org/ FYI

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-02 Thread David Smiley (@MITRE.org)
dubious / arbitrary, but I do think books definitely belong here. ~ David - Author: http://www.packtpub.com/apache-solr-3-enterprise-search-server/book -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-New-Website-tp3704403p3711015.html Sent from the Lucene - Java

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-02 Thread Grant Ingersoll
I increased the font size and made it darker. I also updated the tutorial. Time for me to do other things until this weekend when I'm going to cut over, so if you have stuff you don't like before we cut over, see instructions below. This weekend, I will bring in the old versioned docs as

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-01 Thread Doron Cohen
Wow this is impressive! so I'd like to propose we make the leap and switch. + 1 The new site is almost dead simple to edit: ... The whole process is 1000x easier than Forrest. You can even edit via the web using a WYSWIG editor if you so desire. This by itself is a major reason to

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-01 Thread Michael McCandless
+1 to cut over now and iterate after that... great work Grant! Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote: As many of you know, I've been doing a slow burn on switching us over to the new ASF CMS.  I'm finally at a

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-01 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Feb 1, 2012, at 3:32 AM, Doron Cohen wrote: Wow this is impressive! so I'd like to propose we make the leap and switch. + 1 The new site is almost dead simple to edit: ... The whole process is 1000x easier than Forrest. You can even edit via the web using a WYSWIG editor if

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-01 Thread Doron Cohen
HI Grant, - Page icon (shown in the address bar) is that of Solr - should be that of Lucene. ? I meant this little icon: (hope it will show in the email to the list, if not I can send you privately). [image: image.png] PS I guess it is me to blame not the new site - that somewhat

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-01 Thread Doron Cohen
- Page icon (shown in the address bar) is that of Solr - should be that of Lucene. ? I meant this little icon: (hope it will show in the email to the list, if not I can send you privately). That icon comes from here: http://lucene.staging.apache.org/images/favicon.ico

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-01 Thread Doron Cohen
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Doron Cohen cdor...@gmail.com wrote: HI Grant, PS I guess it is me to blame not the new site - that somewhat grayed-out text is harder to read - but there are many modern sites like this so will have to learn to live with it. Clarification please? I

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-01 Thread Grant Ingersoll
ah, yes, the favicon. Easily fixable. Not sure if Lucene has a favicon. On Feb 1, 2012, at 7:19 AM, Doron Cohen wrote: - Page icon (shown in the address bar) is that of Solr - should be that of Lucene. ? I meant this little icon: (hope it will show in the email to the list, if not I

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-01 Thread Grant Ingersoll
OK, will see what I can do. On Feb 1, 2012, at 7:21 AM, Doron Cohen wrote: On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Doron Cohen cdor...@gmail.com wrote: HI Grant, PS I guess it is me to blame not the new site - that somewhat grayed-out text is harder to read - but there are many modern sites like

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-01 Thread Yonik Seeley
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Chris Hostetter hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote: : So, I'd suggest everyone give it a pass through, fix items as they see : them and/or otherwise pitch in and help, because I'm tired of our : current site and how poor it makes us look. Grant: my one concern is

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-01 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Feb 1, 2012, at 9:56 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Chris Hostetter hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote: : So, I'd suggest everyone give it a pass through, fix items as they see : them and/or otherwise pitch in and help, because I'm tired of our : current site and

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-01 Thread Grant Ingersoll
Will try to address it. Patches welcome ;-) Busy brushing off my CSS skills... On Feb 1, 2012, at 11:13 AM, Walter Underwood wrote: On Feb 1, 2012, at 4:14 AM, Doron Cohen wrote: the text I see (tried 3 browsers) is a bit Gray (or faded), and I rather read a page with more contrast

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-01 Thread Erick Erickson
Ahem! Are we talking over 40 fonts here? It's a sad fact that I've been noticing over the last few years that the screen is getting harder to read... Living long enough to have that problem beats the alternative though... Erick On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Walter Underwood

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-01 Thread Dawid Weiss
Time to buy this as your monitor, Erick: http://www.gizmag.com/go/6704/ :) Dawid On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com wrote: Ahem! Are we talking over 40 fonts here? It's a sad fact that I've been noticing over the last few years that the screen is getting

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-01 Thread Chris Hostetter
: Working on it. Note, Markdown allows for the regular use of HTML: : http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax#html right ... hence my question of how we *want* to fix it, given that we have a lot more options for doing things in markdown then we had with forrest ... we almost need

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-02-01 Thread Grant Ingersoll
I pushed some changes. On Feb 1, 2012, at 1:56 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: : Working on it. Note, Markdown allows for the regular use of HTML: : http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax#html right ... hence my question of how we *want* to fix it, given that we have a lot more

[DISCUSS] New Website

2012-01-31 Thread Grant Ingersoll
As many of you know, I've been doing a slow burn on switching us over to the new ASF CMS. I'm finally at a point where I think we are ready, for the most part, so I'd like to propose we make the leap and switch. I finally had time to figure out a workaround for INFRA-3850 and have released

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-01-31 Thread Mark Miller
On Jan 31, 2012, at 2:38 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: I'd like to switch to the new sites over this weekend or early next week at the latest +1 - Thanks for all of you effort on this! - Mark Miller lucidimagination.com

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-01-31 Thread Erick Erickson
If you had the faintest clue how very poor my web design skills are, you'd understand that I'd never stand in the way of an effort like this. Go for it! Erick On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote: On Jan 31, 2012, at 2:38 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:  I'd

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-01-31 Thread Robert Muir
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote: On Jan 31, 2012, at 2:38 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:  I'd like to switch to the new sites over this weekend or early next week at the latest +1 - Thanks for all of you effort on this! +1 from me too. To repeat what

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-01-31 Thread Uwe Schindler
I will miss the forresting, but this is fantastic. Now we can take a chainsaw and kill the forest. On the news pages the latest items are still missing (it ends with the Java7 disasters). +1 Uwe -- Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, 28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de Robert Muir

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-01-31 Thread Dawid Weiss
I think we should just try to do a hard cutover to the new site. The old one looks like a 1990s geocities website and almost discourages you from maintaining it in any way. I would drop the *almost* from the above... +1 for the new layout. Dawid

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-01-31 Thread Tommaso Teofili
2012/1/31 Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote: On Jan 31, 2012, at 2:38 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: I'd like to switch to the new sites over this weekend or early next week at the latest +1 - Thanks for all of you

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-01-31 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Jan 31, 2012, at 3:57 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote: I will miss the forresting, but this is fantastic. Now we can take a chainsaw and kill the forest. On the news pages the latest items are still missing (it ends with the Java7 disasters). Yeah, they need to be updated. Might be a good

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-01-31 Thread Chris Hostetter
: So, I'd suggest everyone give it a pass through, fix items as they see : them and/or otherwise pitch in and help, because I'm tired of our : current site and how poor it makes us look. Grant: my one concern is how the Solr tutorial currently looks, particularly related to inline code and

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-01-31 Thread Jan Høydahl
+1, looks much more inviting for everyone! Great work. Minors: * Enlarge the search box so the full text Search with Apache Solr... is visible. Hey, it's the home page of the world's best search engine, search should be prominent - so why not make the search box muuuch wider and add

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-01-31 Thread Chris Hostetter
Reading up a bit on markdown, and poking arround the generated html and the css we are using i *think* (assuming i understand everything correctly) we have two problems... : places where there should be inlined 'code' in a fixed width : font, ie... ...this looks like CSS problem. Our CSS is

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-01-31 Thread Chris Hostetter
: inline code quoting. we should probably change most of the code css to : use the pre code since that's what the markdown docs i'm looking at : say markdown generates for code blocks. ... : ...that looks like a content problem. we seem to be using source as : the markup for our code

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-01-31 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Jan 31, 2012, at 7:34 PM, Jan Høydahl wrote: +1, looks much more inviting for everyone! Great work. Minors: * Enlarge the search box so the full text Search with Apache Solr... is visible. Hey, it's the home page of the world's best search engine, search should be prominent - so why

Re: [DISCUSS] New Website

2012-01-31 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
gsing...@apache.org To: dev@lucene.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 9:12 PM Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] New Website On Jan 31, 2012, at 7:34 PM, Jan Høydahl wrote: +1, looks much more inviting for everyone! Great work. Minors: * Enlarge the search box so the full text Search