rote:
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> What about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586
>>> >> >>> I have hit this trappy magic1024 limit myself and it would be
>>> great if
>>> >> >>> it could be
at. You would have an RC though :-).
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Uwe Schindler > >
>> >> >>> > wrote:
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> > Hi,
>> >> >&g
earchField and solrQueryParser from schema”. Has it been
> >> >>> > discussed
> >> >>> > already?
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > --
> >> >>> > Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
> >> >
gt;> >>> > discussed
>> >>> > already?
>> >>> >
>> >>> > --
>> >>> > Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
>> >>> > Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
>> >>> >
>> >>
hl, search solution architect
> >>> > Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
> >>> >
> >>> > 25. jan. 2015 kl. 20.07 skrev Uwe Schindler :
> >>> >
> >>> > In addition,
> >>> >
> >>> > on most comp
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> I'd like to fix https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6205 for
> 5.0.0 ... the fix is low risk and the bug looks like index corruption
> when it strikes.
+1
-Yonik
--
015 kl. 20.07 skrev Uwe Schindler :
>>> >
>>> > In addition,
>>> >
>>> > on most computers you extract to your windows “Desktop” and for most
>>> > users
>>> > this is also using a white space (the user name has in most cases white
>>&g
pace (the user name has in most cases white
>> > space in the name), this is also bad user experience.
>> >
>> > Uwe
>> >
>> > -
>> > Uwe Schindler
>> > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>> > http://www.thetaphi.de
>>
Bremen
> > http://www.thetaphi.de
> > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> >
> > From: Anshum Gupta [mailto:ans...@anshumgupta.net]
> > Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2015 7:58 PM
> > To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 5.0.0 RC1
> >
> > I'
hetaphi.de
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
> From: Anshum Gupta [mailto:ans...@anshumgupta.net]
> Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2015 7:58 PM
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 5.0.0 RC1
>
> I'm not really a windows user so I don't really know what's a fix
> Uwe
>
> -
> Uwe Schindler
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de <http://www.thetaphi.de/>
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
> From: Anshum Gupta [mailto:ans...@anshumgupta.net]
> Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2015 7:58 PM
> To: d
ttp://www.thetaphi.de/> http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
From: Anshum Gupta [mailto:ans...@anshumgupta.net]
Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2015 7:58 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 5.0.0 RC1
I'm not really a windows user so I don't really k
ussels! J
>
>
>
> -
>
> Uwe Schindler
>
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>
> http://www.thetaphi.de
>
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
>
>
> *From:* Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de]
> *Sent:* Sunday, January 25, 2015 3:53 PM
> *To:
63, D-28213 Bremen
<http://www.thetaphi.de/> http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de]
Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2015 3:53 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release 5.0.0 RC1
Hey,
if you have Java 8 on your machin
Honestly, I wouldn't prefer mentioning _how to_ get started in the
CHANGES.txt. instead have it in README. We already have that duplicated in
multiple places like CHANGES.txt, README.txt, quickstart.html, Ref guide
etc.
We should just remove that section I think or at the most just point
towards o
; http://www.thetaphi.de
>
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
>
>
> *From:* Anshum Gupta [mailto:ans...@anshumgupta.net]
> *Sent:* Sunday, January 25, 2015 6:17 AM
> *To:* dev@lucene.apache.org
> *Subject:* [VOTE] Release 5.0.0 RC1
>
>
>
> Please review and vote for t
+1 for that re-spin but I'd also give it a day to see if we find more
issues there.
If everyone wants me to just re-spin it only with this fix, I'm fine with
that too.
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 5:43 AM, Erik Hatcher
wrote:
> First, thanks Anshum for taking the release bull by the horns. Lucene an
he.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release 5.0.0 RC1
Please review and vote for the following RC:
Artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~anshum/staging_area/lucene-solr-5.0.0-RC1-rev1654615
Smoke tester:
python3 dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
http://people.apache.org/~anshum/staging_area/lucen
First, thanks Anshum for taking the release bull by the horns. Lucene and Solr
5.0 is an exciting milestone!
I’m just starting to run through RC1, and noticed a leftover now-incorrect bit
in solr/CHANGES.txt. I’d say this actually warrants a respin in and of
itself, alas, but of course let’s
Please review and vote for the following RC:
Artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~anshum/staging_area/lucene-solr-5.0.0-RC1-rev1654615
Smoke tester:
python3 dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
http://people.apache.org/~anshum/staging_area/lucene-solr-5.0.0-RC1-rev1654615
Here's my +1
SUCCE
20 matches
Mail list logo
