For your information, I'm having trouble uploading the Solr artifacts
to dist.apache.org[1] so there might be some delay before I announce
the release. I'll keep you informed.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6827
--
Adrien
Adrien,
I don't see any motion yet on INFRA-6827 - any progress yet? Infra seems
perpetually backed up, but I think they think that release-blocking stuff takes
higher priority, so we should be able to get them to act quickly, I hope.
I'd be happy to nudge on #asfinfra if you think it would
Gavin McDonald just closed INFRA-6827 as fixed, and on #asfinfra he told me
that the per-file limit has been raised to 200MB.
He also said that if we need it raised further, we should ask again.
Steve
On Oct 3, 2013, at 3:06 PM, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote:
Adrien,
I don't see any
Thank you all for testing the release artifacts, the vote passed. I
will start the release process soon.
--
Adrien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
seems like this vote has passed! YAY
simon
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidworks.com wrote:
+1
Thanks for all the patience with re-spins Adrien!
-Yonik
http://lucidworks.com
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Adrien Grand jpou...@gmail.com wrote:
Please vote to
awesome!
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Adrien Grand jpou...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you all for testing the release artifacts, the vote passed. I
will start the release process soon.
--
Adrien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Waaay cool! Thanks for all your effort!
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 3:21 AM, Simon Willnauer
simon.willna...@gmail.com wrote:
awesome!
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Adrien Grand jpou...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you all for testing the release artifacts, the vote passed. I
will start the release
JUH!
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Adrien Grand [mailto:jpou...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 11:55 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene
+1 smoketester passes
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Tommaso Teofili
tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
Tommaso
2013/9/29 Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com
+1
- Mark
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Adrien Grand jpou...@gmail.com wrote:
Please vote to release the following
+1, smoke tester is happy.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Adrien Grand jpou...@gmail.com wrote:
Please vote to release the following artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~jpountz/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.5.0-RC5-rev1527178/
Here is my
+1 smoke tester is happy.
On 30 September 2013 14:37, Michael McCandless luc...@mikemccandless.comwrote:
+1, smoke tester is happy.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Adrien Grand jpou...@gmail.com wrote:
Please vote to release the
+1
Thanks for all the patience with re-spins Adrien!
-Yonik
http://lucidworks.com
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Adrien Grand jpou...@gmail.com wrote:
Please vote to release the following artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~jpountz/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.5.0-RC5-rev1527178/
Here
+1 smoke tester passes.
Shai
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 2:50 AM, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
Smoke tester passes; changes, docs and javadocs look good.
Steve
On Sep 28, 2013, at 12:59 PM, Adrien Grand jpou...@gmail.com wrote:
Please vote to release the following artifacts:
+1
- Mark
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Adrien Grand jpou...@gmail.com wrote:
Please vote to release the following artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~jpountz/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.5.0-RC5-rev1527178/
Here is my +1.
--
Adrien
Thanks!
- Mark
On Sep 27, 2013, at 11:54 PM, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed when merging CHANGES.txt entries to the 4_5 branch that on Sept.
17th Mark Miller committed a 4.5 CHANGES.txt modification to add credit for
somebody http://svn.apache.org/r1524177 (that's the
Please vote to release the following artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~jpountz/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.5.0-RC5-rev1527178/
Here is my +1.
--
Adrien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For
+1
Smoke tester passes; changes, docs and javadocs look good.
Steve
On Sep 28, 2013, at 12:59 PM, Adrien Grand jpou...@gmail.com wrote:
Please vote to release the following artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~jpountz/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.5.0-RC5-rev1527178/
Here is my +1.
--
I attached a fix to the issue Shawn created for the missing implicit
Solr-core-properties-on-RELOAD issue: SOLR-5279
IMHO, this regression should be fixed in 4.5.
Adrien, I tried to raise you on IRC but didn't get a response - is it okay with
you to do a respin? I'll commit to trunk and
Hi Steve,
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote:
I attached a fix to the issue Shawn created for the missing implicit
Solr-core-properties-on-RELOAD issue: SOLR-5279
IMHO, this regression should be fixed in 4.5.
Adrien, I tried to raise you on IRC but didn't
Thanks Adrien.
I've finished backporting SOLR-5279, and also backported SOLR-5281.
Steve
On Sep 27, 2013, at 4:30 PM, Adrien Grand jpou...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Steve,
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote:
I attached a fix to the issue Shawn created for the
I noticed when merging CHANGES.txt entries to the 4_5 branch that on Sept. 17th
Mark Miller committed a 4.5 CHANGES.txt modification to add credit for somebody
http://svn.apache.org/r1524177 (that's the branch_4x commit), but didn't also
commit to the then-five-day-old 4_5 branch. So I merged
@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.5.0 RC2
Here is a new release candidate that fixes some JavaBin codec backward
compatibility issues (SOLR-5261, SOLR-4221).
Please vote to release the following artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~jpountz/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.5.0-RC2
Thanks to Markus Jelsma's thoughtful testing, other backward
compatibility issues of the JavaBin codec have been found and fixed
(SOLR-4221). Please vote to release the following artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~jpountz/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.5.0-RC3-rev1526423/
The vote is open until
I hate to say it but ...
I think we should respin for LUCENE-5218?
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Adrien Grand jpou...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks to Markus Jelsma's thoughtful testing, other backward
compatibility issues of the JavaBin codec
oh boy... I think we can backport LUCENE-5245 then as well?
simon
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
I hate to say it but ...
I think we should respin for LUCENE-5218?
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013
Agreed, LUCENE-5218 seems to be worth a respin. I will also backport
LUCENE-5245 as per Simon's suggestion.
--
Adrien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Here is a new release candidate for which LUCENE-5218, LUCENE-5245 and
LUCENE-5233 have been backported. Please vote to release the following
artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~jpountz/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.5.0-RC4-rev1526586/
This vote is open until Tuesday.
Smoke tester was happy on
On 9/26/2013 1:26 PM, Adrien Grand wrote:
Here is a new release candidate for which LUCENE-5218, LUCENE-5245 and
LUCENE-5233 have been backported. Please vote to release the following
artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~jpountz/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.5.0-RC4-rev1526586/
This vote is
Here is a new release candidate that fixes some JavaBin codec backward
compatibility issues (SOLR-5261, SOLR-4221).
Please vote to release the following artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~jpountz/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.5.0-RC2-rev1526012/
Smoke tester was happy on my end so here is my
+1 smoker is also happy on my end
On 25 September 2013 08:55, Adrien Grand jpou...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is a new release candidate that fixes some JavaBin codec backward
compatibility issues (SOLR-5261, SOLR-4221).
Please vote to release the following artifacts:
+1 for Windows 7 with IE10.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Adrien Grand
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 2:55 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.5.0 RC2
Here is a new release candidate that fixes some JavaBin codec backward
compatibility
Yonik,
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 1:52 AM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidworks.com wrote:
The fix has been committed to the 45 branch.
Given how much pain was caused the last time the binary format changed
(the change from modified-UTF8 to normal UTF-8), I think this warrants
a 4.5 re-spin.
Thanks
Folks... I discovered a serious back compat issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5261
Looking into it now...
-Yonik
http://lucidworks.com
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Adrien Grand jpou...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is a new release candidate. Difference with the previous
SUCCESS! [1:04:30.537779]
+1 to release! thanks adrien!
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 3:32 AM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: :
http://people.apache.org/~jpountz/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.5.0-RC1-rev1524755/
Once i fixed the javadoc linter workarround to hte 4_5 branch, I
The fix has been committed to the 45 branch.
Given how much pain was caused the last time the binary format changed
(the change from modified-UTF8 to normal UTF-8), I think this warrants
a 4.5 re-spin.
-Yonik
http://lucidworks.com
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Yonik Seeley
Hi Chris,
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 2:33 AM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
I *think* this means that we just need to backport r1522884 to the 4_5
branch, but i don't think we need a re-spin.
Thanks for reporting this error. I agree this doesn't need a respin,
especially given
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Adrien Grand jpou...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll backport the commit to lucene_solr_4_5.
Oh, I see you have already done that, thanks!
--
Adrien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
+1, smoke tester is happy for me (Windows 7, 64-bit).
Shai
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Adrien Grand jpou...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Adrien Grand jpou...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll backport the commit to lucene_solr_4_5.
Oh, I see you have already done that,
: On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Adrien Grand jpou...@gmail.com wrote:
: I'll backport the commit to lucene_solr_4_5.
:
: Oh, I see you have already done that, thanks!
yeah, sorry -- i ment to followup and forgot to hit send.
-Hoss
: :
http://people.apache.org/~jpountz/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.5.0-RC1-rev1524755/
Once i fixed the javadoc linter workarround to hte 4_5 branch, I
found no other problems with RC1 other then LUCENE-5233 -- and i certainly
don't think LUCENE-5233 is significant enough to warrant a re-spin.
-Original Message- From: Adrien Grand
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 5:46 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.5.0
Hi all,
Please test and vote to release the following Lucene and Solr 4.5.0
artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~**jpountz/staging_area
: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 5:46 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.5.0
Hi all,
Please test and vote to release the following Lucene and Solr 4.5.0
artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~jpountz/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.5.0-RC0-rev1524484/
This vote
+1
Smoke tester passes; changes, docs and javadocs look good.
Steve
On Sep 18, 2013, at 5:46 PM, Adrien Grand jpou...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Please test and vote to release the following Lucene and Solr 4.5.0 artifacts:
+1 Smoke tester passes
On 19 September 2013 11:47, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
Smoke tester passes; changes, docs and javadocs look good.
Steve
On Sep 18, 2013, at 5:46 PM, Adrien Grand jpou...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Please test and vote to release the following Lucene
- From: Adrien Grand
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 5:46 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.5.0
Hi all,
Please test and vote to release the following Lucene and Solr 4.5.0
artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~**jpountz/staging_area/lucene-**
solr-4.5.0-RC0
. Even tried the UI on IE10.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message- From: Adrien Grand
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 5:46 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.5.0
Hi all,
Please test and vote to release the following Lucene and Solr 4.5.0
It looks like the last commit on SOLR-4221 didn't make it on the 45
branch. This is a change to a new API and hence needs to make it into
4.5
-Yonik
http://lucidworks.com
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Adrien Grand jpou...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Please test and vote to release the
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidworks.com wrote:
It looks like the last commit on SOLR-4221 didn't make it on the 45
branch. This is a change to a new API and hence needs to make it into
4.5
Thanks for noticing this issue, I will backport the commit.
Hoss, do
I see a commit message on branch_4x for the changes I made . Isn't it the
same branch?
On 19 Sep 2013 19:00, Adrien Grand jpou...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidworks.com
wrote:
It looks like the last commit on SOLR-4221 didn't make it on the
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्
noble.p...@gmail.com wrote:
I see a commit message on branch_4x for the changes I made . Isn't it the
same branch?
I created the lucene_solr_4_5 branch last week, which I'm using to
create release candidates. The purpose was to allow
LUCENE-5223 and the missing commit from SOLR-4221 have been
backported. A new RC is currently being uploaded...
--
Adrien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Here is a new release candidate. Difference with the previous
candidate is that this RC1 now has LUCENE-5223 as well as the missing
commit from SOLR-4221:
http://people.apache.org/~jpountz/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.5.0-RC1-rev1524755/
This vote is open until Tuesday.
Smoke tester was happy on
+1
Smoke tester passes; changes, docs and javadocs look good.
Steve
On Sep 19, 2013, at 1:56 PM, Adrien Grand jpou...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is a new release candidate. Difference with the previous
candidate is that this RC1 now has LUCENE-5223 as well as the missing
commit from SOLR-4221:
+1, including UI on IE10.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Adrien Grand
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 1:56 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.5.0 RC1
Here is a new release candidate. Difference with the previous
candidate
@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.5.0 RC1
Here is a new release candidate. Difference with the previous
candidate is that this RC1 now has LUCENE-5223 as well as the missing
commit from SOLR-4221:
http://people.apache.org/~**jpountz/staging_area/lucene-**
solr-4.5.0
:
http://people.apache.org/~jpountz/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.5.0-RC1-rev1524755/
I'm seeing the same java6 javadoc validation error in smoke tester that
jenkins was complaining about.
sarowe pointed out that mccandless committed a workarround for this to the
4x branch, but that didn't get
Hi all,
Please test and vote to release the following Lucene and Solr 4.5.0 artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~jpountz/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.5.0-RC0-rev1524484/
This vote is open until monday.
Smoke tester passed and Elasticsearch tests ran successfully with
these artifacts, so here is
+1 for my quick test. Even tried the UI on IE10.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Adrien Grand
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 5:46 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.5.0
Hi all,
Please test and vote to release the following Lucene
18, 2013 5:46 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.5.0
Hi all,
Please test and vote to release the following Lucene and Solr 4.5.0
artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~**jpountz/staging_area/lucene-**
solr-4.5.0-RC0-rev1524484/http://people.apache.org/~jpountz
59 matches
Mail list logo
