[x ] Rename 3.x and 4.x to -SNAPSHOT.jar
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 8:05 AM, Grant Ingersoll
> wrote:
>>
>> We make no guarantees about snapshot builds anyway. They are not official
>> releases and are for developer convenience.
>
> exactl
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 8:05 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
> We make no guarantees about snapshot builds anyway. They are not official
> releases and are for developer convenience.
>
>
exactly, they should be for *our* convenience. Therefore, the same
verification step that runs before actual rele
On Sep 21, 2010, at 8:53 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
>
> [x ] Rename 3.x and 4.x to -SNAPSHOT.jar
We make no guarantees about snapshot builds anyway. They are not official
releases and are for developer convenience.
-Grant
[X] Rename 3.x and 4.x to -SNAPSHOT.jar
I don't much care about the name of the unreleased jar files.
But note: i still think there are verification steps we should take before
automatically pushing even snapshots to the apache repository...
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
>
> [x] Rename 3.x and 4.x to -SNAPSHOT.jar
Easier maven integration is worth the aesthetic change (though I think
-dev looks better!)
ryan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-m
In an effort to have better maven support, I think it is worth making
our dev builds easily compatible with maven snapshot builds. To get
maven to know a file is an unreleased snapshot, it must include
SNAPSHOT in the name currently the dev jars end with -dev.jar.
If we change the default name to
