> :-) It would be great if we could ever have that, but I don’t think that’s
> possible!
> Most non-reproducibility in Lucene came from multi-threaded tests where the
> different threads interact with > each other... And that cannot be solved in
> any case without serial execution.
If there are
> > I mean "reproducibility bugs" where somehow a test doesn't reproduce
> > because of bugs in LuceneTestCase :)
>
> Oh no -- the whole point of all this is so that we have 100% reproducibility
> (is
> there even a word like that?) or failures saying something like: "this random
> shouldn't be s
> I mean "reproducibility bugs" where somehow a test doesn't reproduce
> because of bugs in LuceneTestCase :)
Oh no -- the whole point of all this is so that we have 100%
reproducibility (is there even a word like that?) or failures saying
something like: "this random shouldn't be shared and is, f
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Dawid Weiss
wrote:
>> Personally I say 'go for it'. My only concern is that test failures
>> reproduce, but this is likely just paranoia from the existing
>> code...I'm guessing you have this under control.
>
> You mean past test failures (with known seeds)?
no t
> Personally I say 'go for it'. My only concern is that test failures
> reproduce, but this is likely just paranoia from the existing
> code...I'm guessing you have this under control.
You mean past test failures (with known seeds)? This won't be possible
I'm afraid. Any change to how seeds are pr
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Dawid Weiss
wrote:
>
> There is a lot of code I already pruned from LuceneTestCase as part of
+1: this thing is out of control and not really maintainable from just
adding this test-feature and that... And currently nobody 'tests the
tester' so we don't know if a
thanks david for the hard work this is awesome!
simon
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Tommaso Teofili wrote:
> Nice improvements! +1
> Tommaso
>
>
> 2012/2/17 Dawid Weiss
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> as part of this:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3785
>>
>> I've been working
Nice improvements! +1
Tommaso
2012/2/17 Dawid Weiss
> Hi everyone,
>
> as part of this:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3785
>
> I've been working on moving away from ant-macros to a custom ANT task;
> potential benefits are mentioned as part of the issue's description.
>
> There
Nice work! I also like the ant test-help target (I also forget the
test options quite often).
Are all options going to be specified in there? I don't see the
tests.iter option.
Martijn
On 17 February 2012 20:17, Mark Miller wrote:
> Sweet.
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Dawid Weiss
> w
Sweet.
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Dawid Weiss
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> as part of this:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3785
>
> I've been working on moving away from ant-macros to a custom ANT task;
> potential benefits are mentioned as part of the issue's description.
>
>
Hi everyone,
as part of this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3785
I've been working on moving away from ant-macros to a custom ANT task;
potential benefits are mentioned as part of the issue's description.
There is a lot of code I already pruned from LuceneTestCase as part of
this
11 matches
Mail list logo
