[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-8810) Flattening of nested disjunctions does not take into account number of clause limitation of builder

2019-07-15 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16885240#comment-16885240 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-8810: - Commit

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-8810) Flattening of nested disjunctions does not take into account number of clause limitation of builder

2019-07-15 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16885235#comment-16885235 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-8810: - Commit

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-8810) Flattening of nested disjunctions does not take into account number of clause limitation of builder

2019-05-24 Thread Atri Sharma (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16847352#comment-16847352 ] Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8810: - ++ agreed. Will post a patch on

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-8810) Flattening of nested disjunctions does not take into account number of clause limitation of builder

2019-05-24 Thread Adrien Grand (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16847343#comment-16847343 ] Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8810: -- Doing instanceof checks feels too fragile to me, this won't

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-8810) Flattening of nested disjunctions does not take into account number of clause limitation of builder

2019-05-24 Thread Atri Sharma (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16847332#comment-16847332 ] Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8810: - [~msauvee] I understand the confusion. Ideally, we should be

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-8810) Flattening of nested disjunctions does not take into account number of clause limitation of builder

2019-05-24 Thread Adrien Grand (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16847320#comment-16847320 ] Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8810: -- I'm expecting that this would mostly be an issue for users

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-8810) Flattening of nested disjunctions does not take into account number of clause limitation of builder

2019-05-24 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16847303#comment-16847303 ] Mickaël Sauvée commented on LUCENE-8810: [~atris] In my test, the inner builder is not erroing

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-8810) Flattening of nested disjunctions does not take into account number of clause limitation of builder

2019-05-23 Thread Atri Sharma (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16847247#comment-16847247 ] Atri Sharma commented on LUCENE-8810: - [~msauvee] I am not able to understand what is the actual