, but I’m just trying to get
a handle on the overall impact.
-- Jack Krupansky
From: Ryan Ernst
Sent: Sunday, October 5, 2014 12:48 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: 5.0 release status?
On Oct 4, 2014 9:35 PM, Jack Krupansky j...@basetechnology.com wrote:
Maybe I just can’t fully make sense
section in the
5.0 migration guide.
Clearly there is plenty of goodness in the 5.0 work, but I’m just trying to
get a handle on the overall impact.
-- Jack Krupansky
From: Ryan Ernst
Sent: Sunday, October 5, 2014 12:48 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: 5.0 release status?
On Oct
I tried to follow all of the trunk 6/branch 5x discussion, but... AFAICT there
was no explicit decision or even implication that a release 5.0 would be
imminent or that there would not be a 4.11 release. AFAICT, the whole trunk
6/branch 5x decision was more related to wanting to have a trunk
On 10/4/2014 10:35 AM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
I tried to follow all of the trunk 6/branch 5x discussion, but... AFAICT
there was no explicit decision or even implication that a release 5.0
would be imminent or that there would not be a 4.11 release. AFAICT, the
whole trunk 6/branch 5x decision
The branch_5x effort is to release what would have been 4.11 as 5.0. The
most notable reason being backcompat for 3x indexes, which as Robert has
put it is unmaintainable.
AFAICT, there isn’t anything super major in 5x that the world is
super-urgently waiting for (WAR vs. server?)
The WAR
?
Do I have everything straight now?
-- Jack Krupansky
From: Ryan Ernst
Sent: Saturday, October 4, 2014 3:57 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: 5.0 release status?
The branch_5x effort is to release what would have been 4.11 as 5.0. The most
notable reason being backcompat for 3x indexes
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Jack Krupansky j...@basetechnology.com wrote:
I tried to follow all of the trunk 6/branch 5x discussion, but... AFAICT
there was no explicit decision or even implication that a release 5.0 would
be imminent or that there would not be a 4.11 release. AFAICT, the
Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Robert Muir
Sent: Saturday, October 4, 2014 10:43 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: 5.0 release status?
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Jack Krupansky j...@basetechnology.com
wrote:
I tried to follow all of the trunk 6/branch 5x discussion
with UpgradeIndexMergePolicy (although
both currently act like an optimize on the old segments, im hoping to
change that soon).
Ryan
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message- From: Robert Muir
Sent: Saturday, October 4, 2014 10:43 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: 5.0 release status
on the direct benefits to users of, say, 4.9
upgrading to 5.0 indexes. Any performance improvement? Any disk space
reduction? Any RAM reduction?
-- Jack Krupansky
From: Ryan Ernst
Sent: Sunday, October 5, 2014 12:24 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: 5.0 release status?
On Oct 4, 2014
should upgrade their format
whenever possible because improvements are always happening.
-- Jack Krupansky
From: Ryan Ernst
Sent: Sunday, October 5, 2014 12:24 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: 5.0 release status?
On Oct 4, 2014 9:13 PM, Jack Krupansky j...@basetechnology.com wrote
11 matches
Mail list logo