-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Erick,
On 10/14/18 00:03, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Can we stick to the question? Which is "what advantages Tomcat
> might bring to be worth the _very_ significant effort it would take
> to replace Jetty, assuming that it's a choice between the two".
On 10/13/2018 11:41 AM, Martin Gainty wrote:
MG>that would only be true if your support didnt spend all their time
on self-serving evasive answers
MG>look at the 100s of JIRA requests that were torpedoed by MarkTrump
Are you TRYING to start a flamewar? I may regret asking this, but I'm
er Schultz
> > *Sent:* Friday, October 12, 2018 4:30 PM *To:*
> > dev@lucene.apache.org *Subject:* Re: Academic question about Solr's
> > embedded web server
> >
> > Shawn,
> >
> > On 10/12/18 15:52, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> >> On 10/12/2018 1:18 PM, Chr
:
>
> --
- --
>
>
*From:* Christopher Schultz
> *Sent:* Friday, October 12, 2018 4:30 PM *To:*
> dev@lucene.apache.org *Subject:* Re: Academic question about Solr's
> embedded web server
>
> Shawn,
>
> On 10/12/18 15:52, Shawn Heisey wrote:
>> On 10/12/2018 1:18 PM, Chr
From: Christopher Schultz
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2018 4:30 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Academic question about Solr's embedded web server
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Shawn,
On 10/12/18 15:52, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 10
I wasn't part of the original decision either. That said, this will be
an uphill battle, for reasons other than "which is better". If we're
going to consider major surgery at that level, we've been talking
about ripping out Jetty completely and going with Netty or similar.
That notion has stalled,
On 10/12/2018 2:30 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
I think the primary reason is that Jetty is more lightweight than
Tomcat.
I think this is more of a perception than actual truth.
That seems like a very real possibility.
And the Jetty that's included with Solr is considerably stripped
down
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Shawn,
On 10/12/18 15:52, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 10/12/2018 1:18 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> I'm curious as to why Solr uses Jetty and not Tomcat.
>
> I wasn't part of the project when that decision was made. Jetty
> was already included
On 10/12/2018 1:18 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
I'm curious as to why Solr uses Jetty and not Tomcat.
I wasn't part of the project when that decision was made. Jetty was
already included with Solr when I first downloaded it -- Solr version
1.4.0, back in 2009. Jetty wasn't quite as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
All,
I'm curious as to why Solr uses Jetty and not Tomcat.
I'm a PMC member for Tomcat and, though I won't go on a crusade to
replace Jetty with Tomcat, here, I would still like to understand the
motivations behind going with Jetty over Tomcat.
10 matches
Mail list logo