FYI (if it is of any interest), we just hacked CloudSolrServer locally
to support routing of realtime-get requests. Limitations are:
- Only id-parameter and not ids-parameter supported in realtime-get
requests.
- Only schemas with uniqueKey on field named id and only id-field of
type string
Hi
I believe Solr(Cloud) is doing some internal routing of update-requests
to make sure documents are stored in the correct core/shard decided by
Solrs internal routing algoritm (I believe it basically finds out who is
the leader-shard for a given document, using shared information in ZK,
Hey Per,
A couple things:
1. Distributed realtime get is coming - I know Yonik was looking at this
recently but got caught up in some other things.
2. There is a Solrj client that is aware of the cluster state - its called
CloudSolrServer. You give it the zookeeper address rather than a
Mark Miller skrev:
Hey Per,
A couple things:
1. Distributed realtime get is coming - I know Yonik was looking at this
recently but got caught up in some other things.
Fantistic! I believe, if the client becomes routing aware, it is only
necessary when you are sending more than one id
On Mar 12, 2012, at 9:39 AM, Per Steffensen wrote:
Mark Miller skrev:
Hey Per,
A couple things:
1. Distributed realtime get is coming - I know Yonik was looking at this
recently but got caught up in some other things.
Fantistic! I believe, if the client becomes routing aware, it
Right, you can't yet even with CloudSolrServer - but I think it will
be done soon - certainly before the 4 release anyway.
Ok, I will cross my fingers for it to be done soon. Thanks for your kind
help.
Regards, Steff
-
To
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
Currently it doesn't send directly to the leader, but this is planned - it's
a little tricky due to lack of access to the Schema for hashing
Hmmm, why is this? Identification of the uniqueKey field? Maybe we
just
On Mar 12, 2012, at 5:32 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
Currently it doesn't send directly to the leader, but this is planned - it's
a little tricky due to lack of access to the Schema for hashing
Hmmm, why is this?
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 12, 2012, at 5:32 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
Currently it doesn't send directly to the leader, but this is planned -
it's a little tricky
