Great!
I would suggest a new /modules for gis. It is worthwhile to have a
/modules/gis/geonames for large-scale tests/demos/benchmarks, with ant
scripts to download datasets and run the tests.
About demos: there is a lot of GEO code out there: libraries
(http://www.openmap.org/), data (geonames,
On Dec 28, 2010, at 1:02 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Smiley, David W. wrote:
>> Thanks for letting me know about this Rob. I think geonames is much simpler
>> (and much less data) to work with than wikipedia. It's plain tab-delimited
>> and I like that it inclu
k
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Re-Geospatial-search-in-Lucene-Solr-tp2157146p2186103.html
Sent from the Solr - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mai
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Smiley, David W. wrote:
> Thanks for letting me know about this Rob. I think geonames is much simpler
> (and much less data) to work with than wikipedia. It's plain tab-delimited
> and I like that it includes the population. I'll press forward with my
> benc
Thanks for letting me know about this Rob. I think geonames is much simpler
(and much less data) to work with than wikipedia. It's plain tab-delimited and
I like that it includes the population. I'll press forward with my benchmark
module based patch. I can relatively easily switch between t
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Smiley, David W. wrote:
> Presently, I’m working on Lucene’s benchmark contrib module to evaluate the
> performance of SOLR-2155 compared to the LatLon type (i.e. a pair of lat-lon
> range queries), and then I’ll work on a more efficient probably non-geohash
> imp
(I was emailing Grant RE geospatial search and it occurred to me I should be
doing this on the Lucene dev list so I've taken it there)
On Dec 28, 2010, at 8:31 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
On Dec 27, 2010, at 11:52 PM, Smiley, David W. wrote:
Hi Grant.
I saw your latest blog post at Lucid Imagina
