Re: Lucene Cyborg

2024-07-28 Thread Armin Braun
30 schrieb Michael McCandless: > > Thanks for sharing Adrien, this is really cool! It's neat that the > > relative gains of Java vs C are quite a bit less than they were ~11 > > years ago when I played with a much smaller subset of queries.  Also, > > COUNT on disju

Re: Lucene Cyborg

2024-07-22 Thread Uwe Schindler
n, this is really cool! It's neat that the relative gains of Java vs C are quite a bit less than they were ~11 years ago when I played with a much smaller subset of queries.  Also, COUNT on disjunction queries with Lucene Cyborg got slower.  What a feat, to port so much of our complex S

Re: Lucene Cyborg

2024-07-22 Thread Michael McCandless
Thanks for sharing Adrien, this is really cool! It's neat that the relative gains of Java vs C are quite a bit less than they were ~11 years ago when I played with a much smaller subset of queries. Also, COUNT on disjunction queries with Lucene Cyborg got slower. What a feat, to port so mu

Lucene Cyborg

2024-07-22 Thread Adrien Grand
Hello everyone, I recently stumbled on this paper after Ishan shared it on LinkedIn: https://github.com/0ctopus13prime/lucene-cyborg-paper/blob/main/LuceneCyborg_Hybrid_Search_Engine_Written_in_Java_and_C%2B%2B.pdf . This is quite impressive: this person did a high-fidelity rewrite of Lucene in